• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会等级制度各层级间的向上和向下亲社会影响:关于美国各县行政当局的实地和实验证据

Upward and Downward Prosocial Influence Across Levels of a Social Hierarchy: Field and Experimental Evidence About Authorities of U.S. Counties.

作者信息

Jung Haesung, Albarracín Dolores

机构信息

Texas Tech University, Lubbock, USA.

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2024 Nov;15(8):955-967. doi: 10.1177/19485506241265429. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1177/19485506241265429
PMID:40917562
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12412892/
Abstract

Although people often engage in prosocial behavior when witnessing prosocial others, little is known about whether and how prosociality spreads across different positions within a social hierarchy. One field study involving 79 U.S. counties found a positive association between the prosociality of community members and their authorities, providing preliminary evidence of similarity in willingness to improve community well-being across levels of a social hierarchy. A follow-up experiment testing the relative magnitude of downward and upward prosocial influence showed that participants playing the role of authorities were more responsive to the prosociality of community members. Findings further showed that the greater response to prosocial influence among authorities was due to their greater optimism. The article ends with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications of these findings and directions for future research.

摘要

尽管人们在目睹亲社会的他人时常常会做出亲社会行为,但对于亲社会行为是否以及如何在社会等级制度中的不同地位之间传播,我们知之甚少。一项涉及美国79个县的实地研究发现,社区成员和亲社会行为与其当局之间存在正相关,这为社会等级制度各层面在改善社区福祉意愿上的相似性提供了初步证据。一项后续实验测试了向下和向上亲社会影响的相对程度,结果表明扮演当局角色的参与者对社区成员的亲社会行为反应更为敏感。研究结果进一步表明,当局对亲社会影响的更大反应是由于他们更大的乐观情绪。文章最后讨论了这些发现的理论和实际意义以及未来研究的方向。

相似文献

1
Upward and Downward Prosocial Influence Across Levels of a Social Hierarchy: Field and Experimental Evidence About Authorities of U.S. Counties.社会等级制度各层级间的向上和向下亲社会影响:关于美国各县行政当局的实地和实验证据
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2024 Nov;15(8):955-967. doi: 10.1177/19485506241265429. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
"I Don't Understand Their Sense of Belonging": Exploring How Nonbinary Autistic Adults Experience Gender.“我不理解他们的归属感”:探索非二元性别的自闭症成年人如何体验性别。
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):462-473. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0071. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
A Pilot Study of Political Experiences and Barriers to Voting Among Autistic Adults Participating in Online Survey Research in the United States.一项针对参与美国在线调查研究的成年自闭症患者的政治经历和投票障碍的试点研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):261-272. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0119. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
The Effect of Labeling During Simulated Contact on Attitudes Toward Autistic Adults.模拟接触过程中的标签对对待成年自闭症患者态度的影响。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):93-99. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0081. eCollection 2025 Feb.
10
Patient buy-in to social prescribing through link workers as part of person-centred care: a realist evaluation.患者通过联络人员接受社会处方作为以患者为中心的护理的一部分:一项现实主义评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 25:1-17. doi: 10.3310/ETND8254.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating the impact of the diseases of despair in Appalachia.调查绝望疾病对阿巴拉契亚地区的影响。
J Appalach Health. 2019 Jul 6;1(2):7-18. doi: 10.13023/jah.0102.02. eCollection 2019.
2
Testing a digitally distributed method to recruit a network of community organizations to fight the consequences of the drug epidemic: A study in 13 American states.测试一种数字化分布式方法,以招募一个社区组织网络来应对毒品泛滥的后果:在 13 个美国州进行的一项研究。
J Community Psychol. 2022 Sep;50(8):3455-3469. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22846. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
3
Prosocial modeling: person role models and the media.亲社会榜样:人物榜样和媒体。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Apr;44:135-139. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.024. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
4
Substance Use in Rural Central Appalachia: Current Status and Treatment Considerations.美国阿巴拉契亚中部农村地区的物质使用情况:现状与治疗考量
Rural Ment Health. 2017 Apr;41(2):123-135. doi: 10.1037/rmh0000064.
5
Positive feelings reward and promote prosocial behavior.积极的情绪会带来回报,并促进亲社会行为。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Apr;20:55-59. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
6
County-Level Vulnerability Assessment for Rapid Dissemination of HIV or HCV Infections Among Persons Who Inject Drugs, United States.美国县级针对注射吸毒者中艾滋病毒或丙型肝炎病毒感染快速传播的脆弱性评估
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Nov 1;73(3):323-331. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001098.
7
A Large Scale Test of the Effect of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior.社会阶层对亲社会行为影响的大规模测试
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 20;10(7):e0133193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133193. eCollection 2015.
8
Prosocial spending and well-being: cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal.亲社会支出与幸福感:心理普遍性的跨文化证据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Apr;104(4):635-52. doi: 10.1037/a0031578. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
9
Trust, conflict, and cooperation: a meta-analysis.信任、冲突与合作:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2013 Sep;139(5):1090-112. doi: 10.1037/a0030939. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
10
Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies.在观察性社会网络研究中,同质性和传播通常相互混淆。
Sociol Methods Res. 2011 May;40(2):211-239. doi: 10.1177/0049124111404820.