Suppr超能文献

用于弱视治疗的选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for amblyopia treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Shamsher Ehtesham, Saccaro Luisa, Pungirum Victor Barreiros, Tran Nghi Bao, Alghaith Omar A H A, Khabazianzadeh Fatemeh, Bridge Holly, Ip I Betina

机构信息

Oxford Eye Hospital, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes, Mogi das Cruzes, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 21;16:1639913. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1639913. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Amblyopia is a neurodevelopmental visual disorder treated with occlusion or pharmacological penalization of the dominant, non-amblyopic eye in early childhood. After early childhood, efficacy of occlusion therapy is limited due to a reduction in neuronal plasticity, and no mainstay clinical treatment is available. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been hypothesized to enhance neuroplasticity in the adult brain, thereby facilitating improvements in amblyopia. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effect of SSRIs on patients with amblyopia.

METHODS

We systematically searched Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled observational studies comparing an SSRI with placebo in patients with amblyopia. Outcomes of interest were visual acuity (VA) change and visual evoked potential (VEP) change (P100 amplitude and latency). Statistical analysis was performed using the web version of RevMan by calculating the mean difference between groups (MD). Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane Q test and I statistics.

RESULTS

Four RCTs and 139 patients were included. 55% patients received SSRIs. Three studies used fluoxetine and one study used citalopram as the intervention. While SSRIs use statistically improved VA (MD 0.09 logMAR, 95% CI 0.04-0.14,  = 0.0004), the extent of improvement was not clinically significant. SSRIs did not have any effect on VEPs.

CONCLUSION

While SSRIs significantly improved VA in patients, the increase was not clinically significant as it represents less than one line of improvement on the Snellen chart. Given the minimal change in VA, it may be necessary to combine SSRIs with other modalities of intervention to demonstrate a clinically significant effect. Secondary endpoints that capture effects at the level of the retina and the brain would provide knowledge of physiological mechanisms that can improve future therapies.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

CRD42025633077, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025633077.

摘要

引言

弱视是一种神经发育性视觉障碍,在儿童早期通过遮盖优势眼(非弱视眼)或药物压抑疗法进行治疗。儿童期过后,由于神经元可塑性降低,遮盖疗法的疗效有限,且尚无主要的临床治疗方法。有假说认为,选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)可增强成人大脑的神经可塑性,从而促进弱视的改善。我们旨在进行一项系统评价和荟萃分析,评估SSRI对弱视患者的影响。

方法

我们系统检索了PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane中心数据库,以查找比较SSRI与安慰剂治疗弱视患者的随机对照试验(RCT)和对照观察性研究。感兴趣的结局指标为视力(VA)变化和视觉诱发电位(VEP)变化(P100波幅和潜伏期)。使用RevMan网络版通过计算组间平均差异(MD)进行统计分析。采用Cochrane Q检验和I统计量评估异质性。

结果

纳入了4项RCT和139例患者。55%的患者接受了SSRI治疗。3项研究使用氟西汀,1项研究使用西酞普兰作为干预措施。虽然使用SSRI在统计学上改善了视力(MD 0.09 logMAR,95%CI 0.04 - 0.14,P = 0.0004),但改善程度在临床上并不显著。SSRI对VEP没有任何影响。

结论

虽然SSRI显著改善了患者的视力,但视力增加在临床上并不显著,因为在斯内伦视力表上的改善不到一行。鉴于视力变化极小,可能有必要将SSRI与其他干预方式联合使用,以证明具有临床显著效果。在视网膜和大脑水平捕捉效应的次要终点将为改善未来治疗的生理机制提供知识。

系统评价注册

CRD42025633077,https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025633077

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/12408552/299ecd51e7b1/fneur-16-1639913-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验