Kapural Leonardo, Patel Janus, Rosenberg Jason Charles, Li Sean, Amirdelfan Kasra, Bedder Marshall
Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
Atrium Health, Wake Forest Baptist Pain Center-Premier, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
J Pain Res. 2025 Aug 30;18:4471-4481. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S538263. eCollection 2025.
Magnetic Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (mPNS) is an emerging neuromodulation therapy for chronic pain. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of mPNS in combination with CMM in patients with post-traumatic or post-surgical pain.
Safety and Efficacy of Axon Therapy (SEAT) was a prospective, randomized, multi-center study conducted across four clinical sites in the United States with 1 year follow-up. Eligible participants were between 18-75 years old, had chronic neuropathic pain for at least three months, and a baseline visual analog scale (VAS) score of 6 or higher. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either Magnetic Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (mPNS) along with their Conventional Medical Management (mPNS+CMM) or CMM alone. Subjects in CMM cohort were allowed to crossover at Day 90. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of subjects with ≥50% reduction of pain intensity at Day 90 without an increase in pain medication. The primary safety endpoint was the proportion of subjects free from therapy-related adverse events at Day 90. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04795635.
90 participants were screened, and 65 met the inclusion criteria to be enrolled (CMM + mPNS 35; CMM: 30). At Day 90, 71% of subjects were considered responders (>50% pain relief) in the CMM + mPNS cohort vs 13% of subjects in the CMM group (p < 0.0001). By the end of the study, 94% of participants were determined to be pain responders in the CMM + mPNS group as well as 69.2% in the Crossover group. The EQ-5D-3L and PGIC responder rates also improved. AEs were considered to be treatment-related in three (8.6%) CMM + mPNS participants, and two (10.5%) Crossover participants.
mPNS was well-tolerated and resulted in significant long-term reductions in pain intensity and improvement in patients with chronic neuropathic pain.
磁外周神经刺激(mPNS)是一种新兴的慢性疼痛神经调节疗法。我们旨在评估mPNS联合常规药物治疗(CMM)对创伤后或手术后疼痛患者的安全性和有效性。
轴突治疗的安全性和有效性(SEAT)是一项在美国四个临床地点进行的前瞻性、随机、多中心研究,随访1年。符合条件的参与者年龄在18 - 75岁之间,患有慢性神经性疼痛至少三个月,且基线视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分≥6分。受试者按1:1随机分组,分别接受磁外周神经刺激(mPNS)联合常规药物治疗(mPNS + CMM)或仅接受CMM治疗。CMM队列中的受试者在第90天允许交叉治疗。主要疗效终点是在第90天疼痛强度降低≥50%且未增加止痛药物使用的受试者数量。主要安全终点是在第90天无治疗相关不良事件的受试者比例。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT04795635。
共筛选了90名参与者,65名符合纳入标准并被纳入研究(CMM + mPNS组35名;CMM组30名)。在第90天,CMM + mPNS队列中71%的受试者被视为有反应者(疼痛缓解>50%),而CMM组中这一比例为13%(p < 0.0001)。到研究结束时,CMM + mPNS组中94%的参与者被确定为疼痛有反应者,交叉治疗组中这一比例为69.2%。EQ - 5D - 3L和PGIC有反应者率也有所提高。在CMM + mPNS组中有3名(8.6%)参与者、交叉治疗组中有2名(10.5%)参与者的不良事件被认为与治疗相关。
mPNS耐受性良好,可显著长期降低慢性神经性疼痛患者的疼痛强度并改善其状况。