Suppr超能文献

轴突疗法的安全性与有效性(SEAT研究):利用磁外周神经刺激(mPNS)治疗神经性疼痛

Safety and Efficacy of Axon Therapy (SEAT Study), Utilizing Magnetic Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (mPNS) for Treatment of Neuropathic Pain.

作者信息

Kapural Leonardo, Patel Janus, Rosenberg Jason Charles, Li Sean, Amirdelfan Kasra, Bedder Marshall

机构信息

Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston Salem, NC, USA.

Atrium Health, Wake Forest Baptist Pain Center-Premier, Winston Salem, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2024 Sep 28;17:3167-3174. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S481944. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many of the current treatments for chronic neuropathic pain have variable effectiveness and known side effects. Given the prevalence of this type of intractable pain (3-17% of general population), additional therapeutic non-invasive approaches are desired. Magnetic Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (mPNS) delivered at 0.5Hz provides an effective pain relief without side effects. The objective of this randomized, controlled, multi-site clinical trial was to compare long-term safety and efficacy of mPNS in patients with chronic, intractable, post-traumatic or post-surgical neuropathic pain to comprehensive Conventional Medical Management (CMM).

METHODS

A total of 65 patients with post-traumatic, post-surgical neuropathy were treated within a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial comparing the safety and effectiveness of mPNS + CMM to CMM alone. Patients were randomized 1:1 and followed through 90 days. The primary endpoint is a proportion of responders, 50% or greater reduction in pain at Day 90. The secondary endpoints included the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC).

RESULTS

At 3 months, 71% of subjects were considered responders (>50% pain relief) in the mPNS + CMM group vs 13% of subjects in the CMM group. The mPNS + CMM group had a mean reduction in VAS scores at Day 90 of 3.8 points (>50% reduction), while CMM showed less than a 1-point (0.7 point) mean reduction or ~10% reduction (p < 0.0001). The EQ-5D-3L score increased in the mPNS + CMM study group, whereas the CMM group showed no improvement in EQ-5D-3L at Day 90. PGIC responder rates were 80.6% and 4.3% at Day 90 for mPNS + CMM and CMM groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

mPNS + CMM was superior to CMM in a randomized prospective study when used for treatment of post-traumatic, post-surgical neuropathy. Due to the lack of other effective non-invasive treatments for neuropathic pain, mPNS should be considered much earlier in the treatment algorithm.

摘要

背景

目前许多治疗慢性神经性疼痛的方法疗效各异且存在已知的副作用。鉴于这类顽固性疼痛的患病率(占普通人群的3 - 17%),人们期望有更多的非侵入性治疗方法。以0.5赫兹频率进行的磁外周神经刺激(mPNS)能有效缓解疼痛且无副作用。这项随机、对照、多中心临床试验的目的是比较mPNS与综合传统医学管理(CMM)对慢性、顽固性、创伤后或术后神经性疼痛患者的长期安全性和疗效。

方法

在一项多中心随机临床试验中,共对65例创伤后、术后神经病变患者进行了治疗,比较mPNS + CMM与单纯CMM的安全性和有效性。患者按1:1随机分组,并随访90天。主要终点是应答者比例,即第90天时疼痛减轻50%或更多。次要终点包括欧洲生活质量5维度3水平(EQ - 5D - 3L)和患者总体改善印象(PGIC)。

结果

在3个月时,mPNS + CMM组中71%的受试者被视为应答者(疼痛缓解>50%),而CMM组中这一比例为13%。mPNS + CMM组在第90天时视觉模拟评分(VAS)平均降低3.8分(>50%降低),而CMM组平均降低不到1分(0.7分)或约10%(p < 0.0001)。mPNS + CMM研究组的EQ - 5D - 3L评分有所增加,而CMM组在第90天时EQ - 5D - 3L无改善。在第90天时,mPNS + CMM组和CMM组的PGIC应答率分别为80.6%和4.3%。

结论

在一项随机前瞻性研究中,当用于治疗创伤后、术后神经病变时,mPNS + CMM优于CMM。由于缺乏其他有效的神经性疼痛非侵入性治疗方法,在治疗方案中应更早考虑mPNS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71b/11446200/10b8c6a047c6/JPR-17-3167-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验