Kapural Leonardo, Patel Janus, Rosenberg Jason Charles, Li Sean, Amirdelfan Kasra, Bedder Marshall
Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
Atrium Health, Wake Forest Baptist Pain Center-Premier, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
J Pain Res. 2024 Sep 28;17:3167-3174. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S481944. eCollection 2024.
Many of the current treatments for chronic neuropathic pain have variable effectiveness and known side effects. Given the prevalence of this type of intractable pain (3-17% of general population), additional therapeutic non-invasive approaches are desired. Magnetic Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (mPNS) delivered at 0.5Hz provides an effective pain relief without side effects. The objective of this randomized, controlled, multi-site clinical trial was to compare long-term safety and efficacy of mPNS in patients with chronic, intractable, post-traumatic or post-surgical neuropathic pain to comprehensive Conventional Medical Management (CMM).
A total of 65 patients with post-traumatic, post-surgical neuropathy were treated within a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial comparing the safety and effectiveness of mPNS + CMM to CMM alone. Patients were randomized 1:1 and followed through 90 days. The primary endpoint is a proportion of responders, 50% or greater reduction in pain at Day 90. The secondary endpoints included the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC).
At 3 months, 71% of subjects were considered responders (>50% pain relief) in the mPNS + CMM group vs 13% of subjects in the CMM group. The mPNS + CMM group had a mean reduction in VAS scores at Day 90 of 3.8 points (>50% reduction), while CMM showed less than a 1-point (0.7 point) mean reduction or ~10% reduction (p < 0.0001). The EQ-5D-3L score increased in the mPNS + CMM study group, whereas the CMM group showed no improvement in EQ-5D-3L at Day 90. PGIC responder rates were 80.6% and 4.3% at Day 90 for mPNS + CMM and CMM groups, respectively.
mPNS + CMM was superior to CMM in a randomized prospective study when used for treatment of post-traumatic, post-surgical neuropathy. Due to the lack of other effective non-invasive treatments for neuropathic pain, mPNS should be considered much earlier in the treatment algorithm.
目前许多治疗慢性神经性疼痛的方法疗效各异且存在已知的副作用。鉴于这类顽固性疼痛的患病率(占普通人群的3 - 17%),人们期望有更多的非侵入性治疗方法。以0.5赫兹频率进行的磁外周神经刺激(mPNS)能有效缓解疼痛且无副作用。这项随机、对照、多中心临床试验的目的是比较mPNS与综合传统医学管理(CMM)对慢性、顽固性、创伤后或术后神经性疼痛患者的长期安全性和疗效。
在一项多中心随机临床试验中,共对65例创伤后、术后神经病变患者进行了治疗,比较mPNS + CMM与单纯CMM的安全性和有效性。患者按1:1随机分组,并随访90天。主要终点是应答者比例,即第90天时疼痛减轻50%或更多。次要终点包括欧洲生活质量5维度3水平(EQ - 5D - 3L)和患者总体改善印象(PGIC)。
在3个月时,mPNS + CMM组中71%的受试者被视为应答者(疼痛缓解>50%),而CMM组中这一比例为13%。mPNS + CMM组在第90天时视觉模拟评分(VAS)平均降低3.8分(>50%降低),而CMM组平均降低不到1分(0.7分)或约10%(p < 0.0001)。mPNS + CMM研究组的EQ - 5D - 3L评分有所增加,而CMM组在第90天时EQ - 5D - 3L无改善。在第90天时,mPNS + CMM组和CMM组的PGIC应答率分别为80.6%和4.3%。
在一项随机前瞻性研究中,当用于治疗创伤后、术后神经病变时,mPNS + CMM优于CMM。由于缺乏其他有效的神经性疼痛非侵入性治疗方法,在治疗方案中应更早考虑mPNS。