• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生办公室之外的治愈:在多布斯时代通过讲述故事促进生殖健康

Healing Outside of a Doctor's Office: Advancing Reproductive Wellness Through Storytelling in the Dobbs Era.

作者信息

Adams Robyn B, McCormick Stacie, Reid Amber T A, Willis D'Andra, Arnold Qiana, Zimba Helen, Morrison Tambra, Jones Marsha

机构信息

Department of Advertising & Brand Strategy, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.

Department of English, Comparative Race & Ethnic Studies, Women & Gender Studies, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Health Equity. 2025 Aug 25;9(1):412-415. doi: 10.1177/24731242251372699. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1177/24731242251372699
PMID:40918624
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12412385/
Abstract

Amber Thurman, Candi Miller, Porsha Ngumezi, Josseli Barnica, and Neveah Crain highlight the tragic outcomes of restrictive abortion bans post-Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. Their stories underscore the need to shift away from viewing medical institutions as the only sources of reproductive care. The Afiya Center's Livable Black Futures Collective advocates for community-based knowledge through a Reproductive Justice storytelling framework. By emphasizing the injustices faced by Black women and birthing people, these narratives aim to reclaim bodily autonomy, dismantle stigma, and foster resilience, ultimately serving as a powerful catalyst for collective healing and activism against systemic oppression.

摘要

安珀·瑟曼、坎迪·米勒、波莎·恩古梅齐、乔塞利·巴尔尼卡和内维娅·克莱恩强调了在多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案之后,限制性堕胎禁令所带来的悲惨后果。她们的故事凸显了有必要改变将医疗机构视为生殖保健唯一来源的观念。阿菲亚中心的“宜居黑人未来集体”通过生殖正义叙事框架倡导基于社区的知识。通过强调黑人女性和分娩者所面临的不公正,这些叙事旨在夺回身体自主权、消除耻辱感并培养复原力,最终成为集体疗愈和反对系统性压迫行动主义的有力催化剂。

相似文献

1
Healing Outside of a Doctor's Office: Advancing Reproductive Wellness Through Storytelling in the Dobbs Era.医生办公室之外的治愈:在多布斯时代通过讲述故事促进生殖健康
Health Equity. 2025 Aug 25;9(1):412-415. doi: 10.1177/24731242251372699. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing the impact of the decision on abortion attitudes by abortion identity labels: a mixed-methods longitudinal study.通过堕胎身份标签评估该决定对堕胎态度的影响:一项混合方法纵向研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2518669. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2518669. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
3
Embracing complexity to challenge stigma: a qualitative analysis of representations of abortion in a Polish storytelling initiative.接纳复杂性以挑战污名化:对波兰一项故事讲述倡议中堕胎表述的定性分析
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2535835. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2535835. Epub 2025 Aug 15.
4
Effects of the decision on abortion and related service provision among sexual and reproductive health clinics in the United States: results from a qualitative study.美国性与生殖健康诊所中堕胎决定及相关服务提供的影响:一项定性研究的结果
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2557074. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2557074. Epub 2025 Sep 24.
5
Navigating the new landscape: A review of evolving abortion legislation impacting genetic counselors' scope of practice in the United States.探索新局势:美国堕胎立法演变对遗传咨询师执业范围影响的综述
J Genet Couns. 2025 Aug;34(4):e70082. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70082.
6
Changes in maternal morbidity and infant outcomes following state-level abortion bans post-Dobbs: a comparative interrupted time series study.多布斯案后各州堕胎禁令对孕产妇发病率和婴儿结局的影响:一项比较中断时间序列研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2265. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23468-8.
7
Experiences of Obstetrician-Gynecologists Providing Pregnancy Care After Dobbs.妇产科医生在多布斯案后提供孕期护理的经历
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e252498. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2498.
8
Demand for Medication Abortion Through Telehealth Before and After the Dobbs v. Jackson Supreme Court Decision in States Where Abortion Is Legal.在堕胎合法的州,多布斯诉杰克逊最高法院判决前后通过远程医疗对药物流产的需求。
Womens Health Issues. 2025 Aug 1. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2025.06.003.
9
Abortion policies at the bedside: incorporating an ethical framework in the analysis and development of abortion legislation.床边的堕胎政策:在堕胎立法的分析与制定中纳入伦理框架。
J Med Ethics. 2023 Dec 14;50(1):2-5. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108412.
10
Changes in Support for Advance Provision and Over-the-Counter Access to Medication Abortion.对提前提供药物流产及非处方获取药物流产支持的变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454767. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54767.

本文引用的文献

1
Reimagining the Future of Reproduction from a Black Queer Lens: An Art-Based Approach to the Study of Reproductive Health Care.从黑人酷儿视角重新构想生殖的未来:一种基于艺术的生殖健康护理研究方法。
Health Commun. 2024 Oct 31:1-11. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2422556.
2
The Unethical Texas Heartbeat Law.《不道德的德克萨斯心跳法》。
Prenat Diagn. 2022 May;42(5):535-541. doi: 10.1002/pd.6136. Epub 2022 Apr 9.