• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辅助几何装置对全口种植义齿印模测量准确性和扫描时间影响的评估

evaluation of the effect of auxiliary geometric device on measurement trueness and scanning time in full-arch implant impressions.

作者信息

Ateşalp İleri Sema, Büyükerkmen Emine Begüm

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

J Adv Prosthodont. 2025 Aug;17(4):197-209. doi: 10.4047/jap.2025.17.4.197. Epub 2025 Aug 19.

DOI:10.4047/jap.2025.17.4.197
PMID:40919044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12411304/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of clinically practical auxiliary geometric devices (AGD) on measurement trueness and scan time in full-arch implant-supported prostheses, focusing on different intraoral scanners (IOS) and implant angulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four implants were planned in an edentulous maxillary arch and divided into two groups based on posterior implant angulation: Model A (Parallel) and Model B (30°). Each model was evaluated under three auxiliary geometric devices (AGD) application types (std, agd1, agd2), and scanned using three different intraoral scanners (IOSs) [3Shape Trios 3 (T), Medit i700 (M), and Cerec Primescan (PS)], resulting in nine groups per model (n = 10). Scanning times and faulty scans were recorded. A conventional impression (CON) was taken as a control and digitized with a desktop scanner. Trueness was analyzed using Geomagic Control X, with statistical significance set at < .05.

RESULTS

Group B had higher RMS values than Group A (40.3 µm vs. 34.7 µm). T_std in Group A (51.4 µm) and T_std (53.1 µm) and Con (50.7 µm) in Group B exceeded the acceptable deviation limit. AGDs reduced deviations to acceptable levels in the Trios 3. The Primescan scanner had the shortest scanning times. AGD use, especially in T_agd2 and M_agd2, shortened scan times and eliminated erroneous scans.

CONCLUSION

The use of AGD has a significant impact on scanners' scanning trueness and time.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估临床实用的辅助几何装置(AGD)对全牙弓种植支持式修复体测量准确性和扫描时间的影响,重点关注不同的口内扫描仪(IOS)和种植体角度。

材料与方法

在上颌无牙颌弓中植入4颗种植体,并根据后部种植体角度分为两组:模型A(平行)和模型B(30°)。每个模型在三种辅助几何装置(AGD)应用类型(std、agd1、agd2)下进行评估,并使用三种不同的口内扫描仪(IOS)[3Shape Trios 3(T)、Medit i700(M)和Cerec Primescan(PS)]进行扫描,每个模型产生9组(n = 10)。记录扫描时间和错误扫描情况。采用传统印模(CON)作为对照,并用台式扫描仪进行数字化处理。使用Geomagic Control X分析准确性,设定统计学显著性为< 0.05。

结果

B组的RMS值高于A组(40.3 µm对34.7 µm))。A组的T_std(51.4 µm)以及B组的T_std(53.1 µm)和Con(50.7 µm)超过了可接受的偏差限度。AGD将Trios 3中的偏差降低到可接受水平。Primescan扫描仪的扫描时间最短。使用AGD,尤其是在T_agd2和M_agd2中,缩短了扫描时间并消除了错误扫描。

结论

AGD的使用对扫描仪的扫描准确性和时间有显著影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45a2/12411304/0d8e9601166c/jap-17-197-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45a2/12411304/61226fe29a88/jap-17-197-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45a2/12411304/78b33e5c20d5/jap-17-197-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45a2/12411304/a649fc6c10ef/jap-17-197-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45a2/12411304/33818edd7f46/jap-17-197-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45a2/12411304/38d516998116/jap-17-197-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45a2/12411304/5e25ffd820e6/jap-17-197-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45a2/12411304/0d8e9601166c/jap-17-197-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45a2/12411304/61226fe29a88/jap-17-197-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45a2/12411304/78b33e5c20d5/jap-17-197-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45a2/12411304/a649fc6c10ef/jap-17-197-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45a2/12411304/33818edd7f46/jap-17-197-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45a2/12411304/38d516998116/jap-17-197-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45a2/12411304/5e25ffd820e6/jap-17-197-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45a2/12411304/0d8e9601166c/jap-17-197-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
evaluation of the effect of auxiliary geometric device on measurement trueness and scanning time in full-arch implant impressions.辅助几何装置对全口种植义齿印模测量准确性和扫描时间影响的评估
J Adv Prosthodont. 2025 Aug;17(4):197-209. doi: 10.4047/jap.2025.17.4.197. Epub 2025 Aug 19.
2
Impact of implant scan body material and angulation on the trueness and precision of digital implant impressions using four intraoral scanners-an in vitro study.种植体扫描体材料和角度对使用四种口内扫描仪进行数字化种植体印模准确性和精确性的影响——一项体外研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):1288. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06502-4.
3
Influence of extraoral scan body design on accuracy of scans recorded using four intraoral and one desktop scanner, with and without AI features: An In Vitro Study.口外扫描体设计对使用四台口内扫描仪和一台台式扫描仪记录的扫描准确性的影响,有无人工智能功能:一项体外研究
J Dent. 2025 Jul 12;161:105970. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105970.
4
Impact of operator experience, scanning pattern, and arch location on the time and trueness of complete denture digitization using an intraoral scanner.口腔内扫描仪操作人员经验、扫描模式和牙弓位置对全口义齿数字化的时间和准确性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Aug;134(2):462-468. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.022. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
5
Trueness and precision of complete denture digital impression compared to conventional impression: an study.全口义齿数字印模与传统印模的准确性和精确性比较:一项研究
PeerJ. 2025 Feb 26;13:e19075. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19075. eCollection 2025.
6
Conventional scan body vs. scan bodies with auxiliary geometric devices: an study for edentulous full-arch implant impressions.传统扫描体与带有辅助几何装置的扫描体对比:一项关于无牙全牙弓种植体印模的研究
Front Oral Health. 2025 Jun 2;6:1574149. doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1574149. eCollection 2025.
7
Complete arch implant scans with standard scan bodies versus scannable healing abutments on scanning accuracy, scanning time, and number of photograms: A comparative clinical study.使用标准扫描体与可扫描愈合基台进行全牙弓种植体扫描对扫描精度、扫描时间和照片数量的影响:一项对比临床研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Sep;134(3):694-703. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.035. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
8
Trueness comparison of various intraoral scanners and hybrid workflow for ceramic restoration.各种口腔内扫描仪的准确性比较及陶瓷修复的混合工作流程
J Appl Oral Sci. 2025 Aug 18;33:e20250065. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2025-0065. eCollection 2025.
9
Alignment accuracy of soft tissue and implant position scans captured by using four intraoral scanners and an intraoral photogrammetry system with and without coded healing abutments.使用四台口腔内扫描仪和一个口腔内摄影测量系统,在有和没有编码愈合基台的情况下,对软组织和种植体位置扫描的对齐精度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.06.015.
10
Feasibility, trueness and precision of intraoral scanners in digitizing maxillectomy defects with exposed zygomatic implants in situ: An in vitro 3D comparative study.口腔内扫描仪在原位数字化颧种植体暴露的上颌骨切除缺损中的可行性、准确性和精确性:一项体外三维比较研究。
J Dent. 2025 Feb;153:105557. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105557. Epub 2025 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of auxiliary geometric devices on the accuracy of intraoral scans in full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: An in vitro study.辅助几何装置对全口种植义齿修复中口内扫描精度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Dent. 2024 Jun;145:104979. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104979. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
2
Effect of novel prefabricated auxiliary devices attaching to scan bodies on the accuracy of intraoral scanning of complete-arch with multiple implants: An in-vitro study.新型预制辅助装置附着于扫描体对多种植体全口扫描精度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Dent. 2023 Nov;138:104702. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104702. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
3
Effect of splinting scan bodies on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 different intraoral scanners.
不同口内扫描仪扫描分体式扫描杆对全牙弓数字化种植体印模精度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Jul;132(1):204-210. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.06.015. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
4
Enhancing intraoral scanner accuracy using scan aid for multiple implants in the edentulous arch: An in vivo study.使用扫描辅助工具增强无牙弓中多个种植体的口内扫描仪准确性:一项体内研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Aug;34(8):793-801. doi: 10.1111/clr.14107. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
5
Effect of different intraoral scanners and scanbody splinting on accuracy of scanning implant-supported full arch fixed prosthesis.不同口腔内扫描仪及扫描体固定对种植支持全牙弓固定修复体扫描精度的影响
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Dec;35(8):1257-1263. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13070. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
6
Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study.比较传统技术和数字化扫描在有和没有预制标志的下颌情况下全口种植体印模的准确性:一项体外研究。
J Dent. 2023 Aug;135:104561. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104561. Epub 2023 May 24.
7
Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis when using an auxiliary geometry device.使用辅助几何装置时种植体支持的全牙弓修复体数字印模的准确性。
J Dent Sci. 2023 Apr;18(2):808-813. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.01.012. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
8
Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study.不同种植体支持的固定局部义齿情况的扫描准确性和时间效率取决于口内扫描仪和扫描区域:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Jun;131(6):1198-1207. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.029. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
9
A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans: Part 2-Patient factors.提高口内数字扫描准确性的指南:第2部分——患者因素。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Jan;35(1):241-249. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12993. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
10
Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study.扫描技术对无牙上颌骨口腔内扫描系统准确性和速度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Prosthodont. 2023 Dec;32(9):821-828. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13633. Epub 2023 Jan 11.