Wingrove Peter, Zuaro Beatrice, Nao Marion, Yuksel Dogan, Littvay Levente, Hultgren Anna Kristina
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies, School of Languages and Applied Linguistics, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Science Centre of Excellence, Budapest, Hungary.
High Educ (Dordr). 2025;90(2):497-520. doi: 10.1007/s10734-024-01333-8. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
Despite extensive research into English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) in higher education, few if any studies have explored the role of higher education autonomy in driving EMI. This paper tests the novel hypothesis that university autonomy-spearheaded across European higher education through neoliberally predicated 'steering at a distance' reforms-predicts EMI. The data are multilevel with higher education institutions (HEIs) nested inside education systems. The University Autonomy Scorecards (Pruvot & Estermann, 2017) operationalise university autonomy at the education-system level ( = 26) and measure four dimensions of autonomy: academic, financial, staffing, and organisational. We include 'overall autonomy' as the average. The European Tertiary Education Register provides HEI-level data ( = 1815), which we combine with a count of English-taught degree programmes (ETPs) to measure EMI, provided by Study Portals, the largest online portal of degree programmes. We conduct multilevel regression to analyse the relationships between autonomy and EMI. The results showed that overall autonomy predicts EMI in public universities ( = 0.002). Increasing overall autonomy by one point above the mean increases the likelihood of offering EMI by 9.5%. Academic, staffing, and organisational autonomy predict EMI in public universities, whereas financial autonomy does not. The first to quantify a relationship between university autonomy and EMI, this study offers new insights into how EMI comes about. By revealing a previously obscured interconnectedness between language shift and higher education governance, the study demonstrates the value added of an interdisciplinary approach and proposes a new line of inquiry for future research.
尽管针对高等教育中以英语为教学语言(EMI)展开了广泛研究,但几乎没有研究探讨过高等教育自主权在推动EMI方面的作用。本文检验了一个新假设,即通过新自由主义预设的“远距离调控”改革在欧洲高等教育中率先推行的大学自主权预示着EMI。数据是多层次的,高等教育机构(HEIs)嵌套在教育系统中。大学自主权记分卡(普鲁沃特和埃斯特曼,2017年)在教育系统层面(=26)对大学自主权进行操作化,并衡量自主权的四个维度:学术、财务、人员配备和组织。我们将“总体自主权”作为平均值。欧洲高等教育注册处提供高等教育机构层面的数据(=1815),我们将其与由最大的学位课程在线门户“学习门户”提供的英语授课学位课程(ETPs)数量相结合,以衡量EMI。我们进行多层次回归分析自主权与EMI之间的关系。结果表明,总体自主权预示着公立大学的EMI(=0.002)。总体自主权比平均水平提高一分,提供EMI的可能性就增加9.5%。学术、人员配备和组织自主权预示着公立大学的EMI,而财务自主权则不然。本研究首次量化了大学自主权与EMI之间的关系,为EMI的形成提供了新的见解。通过揭示语言转变与高等教育治理之间先前被掩盖的相互联系,该研究展示了跨学科方法的附加值,并为未来研究提出了新的研究方向。