• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

民主价值观在自然科学教育中的融入:过去50年文献综述

Integration of Democratic Values ​​in Natural Sciences Education: a Review of the Literature of the Last 50 Years.

作者信息

Monsalve-Silva Santiago, Otalvaro-García Gabriel, Cajica Velandia Laura Sofía, Vargas Sánchez Ana Dolores

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Cundinamarca, Colombia.

Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de La Sabana, Chia, Cundinamarca, Colombia.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2025 Apr 7;13:940. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.154069.3. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.154069.3
PMID:40919446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12413607/
Abstract

This study examines how democratic values have been promoted through natural sciences education over the last 50 years, providing a comprehensive analysis based on a systematic review of relevant literature. The central problem addressed is understanding the role of natural science education in fostering democratic values such as equity, participation, critical thinking, and ethical responsibility. This research aims to identify and analyze strategies, methodologies, and transformative experiences that contribute to the promotion of democratic values. This study employs the PRISMA methodology to ensure a rigorous and structured systematic review. Data were collected from multiple databases using detailed Boolean equations. Tools such as ScientoPy and VOSviewer were used for data preprocessing, clustering, and network visualization, followed by qualitative analysis to categorize the findings. Educational programs in natural sciences have increasingly integrated democratic values, fostering a culture of inclusivity and participation; the incorporation of ICT has enhanced equity and participation, while civic education has been fundamental in developing critical and informed citizens; citizen science initiatives have empowered students to engage in democratic deliberation and address epistemic injustice; cooperative learning methods in science classes have effectively promoted gender equity and inclusion; and emphasis on sustainability and environmental justice in science education has promoted democratic values and empowered students to take action on global challenges. In conclusion, natural science education is an effective vehicle for promoting democratic values, but it is an understudied field. By integrating practices that emphasize inclusivity, critical thinking, and ethical responsibility, science education not only enhances students' scientific understanding but also prepares them to be active, informed, and responsible citizens.

摘要

本研究考察了在过去50年里民主价值观是如何通过自然科学教育得到促进的,基于对相关文献的系统综述进行了全面分析。所解决的核心问题是理解自然科学教育在培养公平、参与、批判性思维和道德责任等民主价值观方面的作用。本研究旨在识别和分析有助于促进民主价值观的策略、方法和变革性经历。本研究采用PRISMA方法以确保进行严格且结构化的系统综述。使用详细的布尔方程从多个数据库收集数据。使用ScientoPy和VOSviewer等工具进行数据预处理、聚类和网络可视化,随后进行定性分析以对研究结果进行分类。自然科学教育项目越来越多地融入民主价值观,营造了包容和参与的文化;信息通信技术的融入增强了公平性和参与度,而公民教育对于培养有批判性思维和见多识广的公民至关重要;公民科学倡议使学生有能力参与民主审议并解决认知不公;科学课中的合作学习方法有效地促进了性别平等和包容;科学教育中对可持续性和环境正义的强调促进了民主价值观,并使学生有能力应对全球挑战采取行动。总之,自然科学教育是促进民主价值观的有效途径,但却是一个研究不足的领域。通过整合强调包容性、批判性思维和道德责任的实践,科学教育不仅增强了学生的科学理解,还使他们准备好成为积极、见多识广和有责任感的公民。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d43/12432494/18525e33549d/f1000research-13-187850-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d43/12432494/bb487f3b7a6a/f1000research-13-187850-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d43/12432494/48412a28cb9f/f1000research-13-187850-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d43/12432494/551f21e7cdd8/f1000research-13-187850-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d43/12432494/dec6c6b77db2/f1000research-13-187850-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d43/12432494/931890433510/f1000research-13-187850-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d43/12432494/18525e33549d/f1000research-13-187850-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d43/12432494/bb487f3b7a6a/f1000research-13-187850-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d43/12432494/48412a28cb9f/f1000research-13-187850-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d43/12432494/551f21e7cdd8/f1000research-13-187850-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d43/12432494/dec6c6b77db2/f1000research-13-187850-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d43/12432494/931890433510/f1000research-13-187850-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d43/12432494/18525e33549d/f1000research-13-187850-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Integration of Democratic Values ​​in Natural Sciences Education: a Review of the Literature of the Last 50 Years.民主价值观在自然科学教育中的融入:过去50年文献综述
F1000Res. 2025 Apr 7;13:940. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.154069.3. eCollection 2024.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Wood Waste Valorization and Classification Approaches: A systematic review.木材废料的增值与分类方法:一项系统综述
Open Res Eur. 2025 May 6;5:5. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18862.1. eCollection 2025.
9
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
10
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.

本文引用的文献

1
On Antiscience and Antisemitism.论反科学与反犹主义。
Perspect Biol Med. 2023;66(3):420-436. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2023.a902035.
2
Citizen Science in Deliberative Systems: Participation, Epistemic Injustice, and Civic Empowerment.协商系统中的公民科学:参与、认知不公正与公民赋权
Minerva. 2022;60(4):489-508. doi: 10.1007/s11024-022-09467-8. Epub 2022 May 9.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
4
Challenging Expertise: Paul Feyerabend vs. Harry Collins & Robert Evans on democracy, public participation and scientific authority: Paul Feyerabend vs. Harry Collins & Robert Evans on scientific authority and public participation.挑战专业知识:保罗·费耶阿本德与哈里·柯林斯及罗伯特·埃文斯论民主、公众参与和科学权威:保罗·费耶阿本德与哈里·柯林斯及罗伯特·埃文斯论科学权威与公众参与
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2016 Jun;57:114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
5
Science, expertise, and democracy.科学、专业知识与民主。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2012 Jun;22(2):83-90. doi: 10.1353/ken.2012.0006.