• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于低成本富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的评估:一项初步研究。

An evaluation of a low-cost platelet-rich plasma for osteoarthritis of the knee: A pilot study.

作者信息

Cushman Daniel M, Johnson Luke A, Burnham Taylor, Nelson Richard, Egbert Jamie, Burnham Robert

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA.

Department of Orthopaedics University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA.

出版信息

J Exp Orthop. 2025 Sep 5;12(3):e70420. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70420. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:10.1002/jeo2.70420
PMID:40919485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12411927/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the characteristics and effectiveness of low-cost platelet-rich plasma (LC-PRP) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) by evaluating its composition and effect on pain, function, satisfaction, safety and cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

Level IV evidence single-arm prospective cohort pilot study of 20 subjects (30 knees total) with mild-to-moderate knee OA. Two LC-PRP injections were performed, 3 weeks apart. Platelet extraction/yield, patient-reported outcomes and incidence of adverse events were assessed with a primary endpoint of 6 months. A cost-effectiveness analysis of LC-PRP compared to corticosteroid injection was conducted.

RESULTS

On average, this LC-PRP preparation method allowed for recovery of 85% of platelets. Significant mean differences in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (total, pain and function) and global assessment score were observed at all follow-up points compared to baseline ( < 0.05 for 1, 3, 6 and 12 months). Satisfaction was noted in 90% of patients at 6 months and 75% of patients at 12 months. No significant adverse events were reported. LC-PRP was less costly ($654 vs. $1308) and yielded more QALYs (0.846 vs. 0.708) than corticosteroid injections. Per injection costs were estimated to be $10 for corticosteroid and $11 for LC-PRP.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study demonstrates that LC-PRP ($11) may significantly benefit patients with knee OA. LC-PRP appears to be a safe, cost-effective means for improving pain and function in knee OA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

摘要

目的

通过评估低成本富血小板血浆(LC-PRP)的成分及其对疼痛、功能、满意度、安全性和成本效益的影响,来评估其用于膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的特性和有效性。

方法

对20名(共30个膝关节)轻至中度膝关节OA患者进行IV级证据单臂前瞻性队列试验研究。进行两次LC-PRP注射,间隔3周。评估血小板提取/产量、患者报告的结局和不良事件发生率,主要终点为6个月。对LC-PRP与皮质类固醇注射进行成本效益分析。

结果

平均而言,这种LC-PRP制备方法可回收85%的血小板。与基线相比,在所有随访点观察到西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分(总分、疼痛和功能)及整体评估评分存在显著平均差异(1、3、6和12个月时P<0.05)。6个月时90%的患者和12个月时75%的患者表示满意。未报告显著不良事件。与皮质类固醇注射相比,LC-PRP成本更低(654美元对1308美元)且产生更多的质量调整生命年(QALY)(0.846对0.708)。估计皮质类固醇每次注射成本为10美元,LC-PRP每次注射成本为11美元。

结论

这项试验研究表明,LC-PRP(11美元)可能使膝关节OA患者显著受益。LC-PRP似乎是改善膝关节OA疼痛和功能的一种安全、具有成本效益的方法。

证据等级

IV级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc7/12411927/7b7b8340357a/JEO2-12-e70420-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc7/12411927/979546256fd9/JEO2-12-e70420-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc7/12411927/eddf6da0dbec/JEO2-12-e70420-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc7/12411927/107e27761148/JEO2-12-e70420-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc7/12411927/c1081ca4ce99/JEO2-12-e70420-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc7/12411927/7b7b8340357a/JEO2-12-e70420-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc7/12411927/979546256fd9/JEO2-12-e70420-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc7/12411927/eddf6da0dbec/JEO2-12-e70420-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc7/12411927/107e27761148/JEO2-12-e70420-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc7/12411927/c1081ca4ce99/JEO2-12-e70420-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc7/12411927/7b7b8340357a/JEO2-12-e70420-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
An evaluation of a low-cost platelet-rich plasma for osteoarthritis of the knee: A pilot study.一项关于低成本富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的评估:一项初步研究。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Sep 5;12(3):e70420. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70420. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
The efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review with quantitative synthesis.富血小板血浆治疗症状性膝骨关节炎的疗效:系统评价与定量综合。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Dec;29(12):2037-48. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.09.006.
3
Efficacy of Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.关节腔内注射富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效:一项系统评价
Arthroscopy. 2016 Mar;32(3):495-505. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
4
Intra-Articular Injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells, and Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Associated With Better Outcomes Than Hyaluronic Acid and Saline in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.关节内注射富血小板血浆、脂肪间充质干细胞和骨髓间充质干细胞在膝骨关节炎中的疗效优于透明质酸和生理盐水:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Jul;37(7):2298-2314.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.045. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
5
Effect of Leukocyte Concentration on the Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.白细胞浓度对富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎疗效的影响
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):792-800. doi: 10.1177/0363546515580787. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
6
Are leukocyte-poor or multiple injections of platelet-rich plasma more effective than hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.白细胞缺乏或多次注射富血小板血浆与透明质酸治疗膝骨关节炎相比哪个更有效?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):3879-3897. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04637-5. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
7
Intra-articular corticosteroid for knee osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎的关节内皮质类固醇治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 22;2015(10):CD005328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005328.pub3.
8
No Long-Term Superiority of Cord-Derived PRP over Autologous PRP in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Cohort Study.脐带血源性富血小板血浆在膝关节骨关节炎中并不优于自体富血小板血浆:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Apr 21;10(2):138. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10020138.
9
Platelet rich plasma compared to viscosupplementation in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with 6 month and 12 month follow-up.富血小板血浆与关节腔注射透明质酸钠治疗膝关节骨关节炎的疗效比较:一项随访6个月和12个月的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 18;12(3):e70335. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70335. eCollection 2025 Jul.
10
Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.活动轴承与固定轴承假体用于骨关节炎和类风湿关节炎患者后交叉韧带保留型全膝关节置换术后功能状态的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 4;2015(2):CD003130. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003130.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
A Greater Platelet Dose May Yield Better Clinical Outcomes for Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.更高血小板剂量的富血小板血浆治疗膝关节骨关节炎可能产生更好的临床结果:一项系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2025 Mar;41(3):809-817.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.03.018. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
2
Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Alternative Injections for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Statistical Fragility Index-Based Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.富血小板血浆与膝关节骨关节炎其他注射治疗的比较:基于随机对照试验的系统评价和统计脆弱指数的荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Oct;52(12):3147-3160. doi: 10.1177/03635465231224463. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
3
Comparison of Conventional Dose Versus Superdose Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective, Triple-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial.
常规剂量与超大剂量富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的比较:一项前瞻性、三盲、随机临床试验
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Feb 26;12(2):23259671241227863. doi: 10.1177/23259671241227863. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Randomized Controlled Trials on Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee Osteoarthritis Poorly Adhere to the Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopaedics (MIBO) Guidelines: A Systematic Review.随机对照试验中富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎不遵循骨科学中评估生物制剂的最低信息标准(MIBO)指南:系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 May;52(6):1617-1623. doi: 10.1177/03635465231185289. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
5
Income-Related Inequality Changes in Osteoarthritis First-Line Interventions: A Cohort Study.骨关节炎一线干预措施中与收入相关的不平等变化:一项队列研究
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Mar;105(3):452-460. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.10.012. Epub 2023 Nov 5.
6
Experts Achieve Consensus on a Majority of Statements Regarding Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatments for Treatment of Musculoskeletal Pathology.专家就富血小板血浆治疗肌肉骨骼病理学的大多数声明达成共识。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Feb;40(2):470-477.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.08.020. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
7
Three Doses of Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy Are More Effective Than One Dose of Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.三剂富血小板血浆疗法比一剂富血小板血浆疗法在膝骨关节炎治疗中更有效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Dec;39(12):2568-2576.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.05.018. Epub 2023 May 24.
8
Variability in Patient-Incurred Costs and Protocols of Regenerative Medicine Procedures for Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States.美国肌肉骨骼疾病再生医学程序的患者自付费用和方案的变异性。
HSS J. 2023 Feb;19(1):77-84. doi: 10.1177/15563316221105880. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
9
Trends in utilization, demographics, and costs of platelet-rich plasma injections: a ten-year nationwide investigation.血小板富血浆注射的利用、人口统计学和成本趋势:一项十年的全国性调查。
Phys Sportsmed. 2024 Feb;52(1):89-97. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2023.2178816. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
10
A Systematic Review on the Effect of Common Medications on Platelet Count and Function: Which Medications Should Be Stopped Before Getting a Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection?常见药物对血小板计数和功能影响的系统评价:在进行富血小板血浆注射前应停用哪些药物?
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Apr 12;10(4):23259671221088820. doi: 10.1177/23259671221088820. eCollection 2022 Apr.