• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架输送系统的弯曲刚度和可跟踪性:神经介入实践的台架见解

Bending stiffness and trackability of carotid stent delivery systems: Bench-top insights for neurointerventional practice.

作者信息

Yamazaki Daisuke, Hanaoka Yoshiki, Horiuchi Tetsuyoshi

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.

Department of Neurosurgery, Ina Central Hospital, Ina, Japan.

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Sep 8:15910199251368705. doi: 10.1177/15910199251368705.

DOI:10.1177/15910199251368705
PMID:40920456
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12417441/
Abstract

BackgroundA stable guiding system is essential for successful carotid artery stenting (CAS), particularly when navigating tortuous aortic or supra-aortic anatomy. However, data on the mechanical behavior of stent delivery systems remain scarce.ObjectiveTo assess and compare the bending stiffness and trackability of five commercially available carotid stent delivery systems using bench-top experiments.MethodsFive stent systems-CASPER RX, PRECISE PRO RX, PROTÉGÉ RX, PROTÉGÉ RX Tapered, and Carotid WALLSTENT-were evaluated. Bending stiffness was measured via a three-point bending test along a 20 cm length from the distal tip. Trackability was assessed by measuring resistance force during simulated advancement through a 6F guiding sheath within a 90° angulated vessel model.ResultsCASPER RX demonstrated the lowest bending stiffness in the stent-mounted segment (85-118 cN), whereas the Carotid WALLSTENT had the lowest stiffness in the delivery-shaft segment (120-180 cN). Systems with higher bending stiffness exhibited increased resistance during trackability testing. A correlation between increased bending stiffness and higher advancement resistance was observed across all platforms.ConclusionsCarotid stent delivery systems exhibit diverse mechanical behaviors that impact navigability through tortuous anatomy. Awareness of these mechanical properties can inform device selection and technique optimization during transradial or anatomically challenging CAS procedures.

摘要

背景

稳定的引导系统对于成功进行颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)至关重要,尤其是在处理迂曲的主动脉或主动脉弓以上解剖结构时。然而,关于支架输送系统力学行为的数据仍然匮乏。

目的

通过台式实验评估和比较五种市售颈动脉支架输送系统的弯曲刚度和可跟踪性。

方法

评估了五种支架系统——CASPER RX、PRECISE PRO RX、PROTÉGÉ RX、PROTÉGÉ RX Tapered和Carotid WALLSTENT。通过从远端尖端沿20厘米长度进行的三点弯曲试验测量弯曲刚度。通过在90°成角血管模型中模拟通过6F引导鞘推进过程中测量阻力来评估可跟踪性。

结果

CASPER RX在支架安装段表现出最低的弯曲刚度(85 - 118 cN),而Carotid WALLSTENT在输送轴段具有最低的刚度(120 - 180 cN)。弯曲刚度较高的系统在可跟踪性测试中表现出更大的阻力。在所有平台上均观察到弯曲刚度增加与推进阻力增加之间存在相关性。

结论

颈动脉支架输送系统表现出多样的力学行为,这些行为会影响在迂曲解剖结构中的导航能力。了解这些力学特性可为经桡动脉或解剖结构复杂的CAS手术中的器械选择和技术优化提供参考。

相似文献

1
Bending stiffness and trackability of carotid stent delivery systems: Bench-top insights for neurointerventional practice.颈动脉支架输送系统的弯曲刚度和可跟踪性:神经介入实践的台架见解
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Sep 8:15910199251368705. doi: 10.1177/15910199251368705.
2
Carotid artery stenting with open vs closed stent cell configurations in the CREST-2 Registry.在CREST-2注册研究中开放与闭合支架网孔结构的颈动脉支架置入术
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jul;82(1):127-135.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.02.025. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Comparison of restenosis and reintervention rates in closed cell stents compared to open cell stents after carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术后,闭合式支架与开放式支架再狭窄和再次干预率的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Aug;82(2):506-516.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.03.199. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Microguidewire stiffness for microcatheter and aspiration catheter navigation in tortuous vessels.用于微导管和抽吸导管在迂曲血管中导航的微导丝硬度
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun 30:15910199251352883. doi: 10.1177/15910199251352883.
8
Comparative evaluation of the CGuard dual-layer stent and Carotid Wallstent for elective carotid artery stenting: a retrospective multicenter study.CGuard双层支架与颈动脉Wallstent用于选择性颈动脉支架置入术的比较评估:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Neuroradiology. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s00234-025-03764-1.
9
Comparison of the treatment strategies for symptomatic chronic internal carotid artery occlusion.有症状的慢性颈内动脉闭塞治疗策略的比较
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Feb;81(2):494-504.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.062. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
10
Carotid Artery Stenting With Double-Layer Stent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉支架置入术联合双层支架:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Jun;31(3):339-349. doi: 10.1177/15266028221126940. Epub 2022 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization: A systematic review.经颈动脉血运重建术的结果:一项系统性综述。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jun;30(3):396-403. doi: 10.1177/15910199221123283. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
2
Anatomical Factors That Impede Using the Radial Artery Approach for Carotid Artery Revascularization.阻碍桡动脉入路行颈动脉血运重建术的解剖学因素。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Apr;160:e398-e403. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.029. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
3
Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 25;2(2):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub5.
4
Carotid artery stenting in difficult aortic arch anatomy with or without a new dedicated guiding catheter: preliminary experience.颈动脉支架置入术治疗困难主动脉弓解剖结构的初步经验:有或无新型专用引导导管。
Eur Radiol. 2013 May;23(5):1420-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2708-7. Epub 2012 Nov 18.
5
Anatomical and technical factors associated with stroke or death during carotid angioplasty and stenting: results from the endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial and systematic review.与颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术期间发生中风或死亡相关的解剖学和技术因素:症状性严重颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉内膜切除术与血管成形术(EVA-3S)试验和系统评价的结果。
Stroke. 2011 Feb;42(2):380-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.588772. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
6
Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.颈动脉狭窄的血管内支架成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):11-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321. Epub 2010 May 26.
7
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术与内膜切除术的比较(国际颈动脉支架研究):一项随机对照试验的中期分析。
Lancet. 2010 Mar 20;375(9719):985-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60239-5. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
8
Comparison of carotid stents: an in-vitro experiment focusing on stent design.颈动脉支架的比较:一项聚焦于支架设计的体外实验。
J Endovasc Ther. 2009 Apr;16(2):168-77. doi: 10.1583/08-2539.1.
9
Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting?游离细胞面积是否会影响颈动脉支架置入术的结果?
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Feb;33(2):135-41; discussion 142-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.09.019. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
10
In-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting: a challenge for the vascular surgeon.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后的支架内再狭窄:血管外科医生面临的一项挑战。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005 Jun;29(6):601-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.01.033.