Horgos Bonnie, Van Wert Michael, Wiseman Jennifer, Wright Jillian, Gus Emily, Markon Kristian, Rohovit Julie
Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Center of Practice Transformation, School of Social Work, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s11414-025-09970-2.
People with mental health and substance use disorders (SUDs) experience worse outcomes, including increased mortality risk, compared to those with SUDs alone. Access to safe, stable housing, in conjunction with treatment, such as intensive outpatient programs (IOP), is vital in early recovery. Nevertheless, those with historically marginalized identities may experience increased disparities in accessing and utilizing services. The aim of this study was to examine disparities in the utilization of recovery residences among adults receiving treatment for mental health disorders and SUDs in an IOP. Participants (n = 2803) were recruited as part of an ongoing program evaluation at a large Midwestern treatment agency offering to cover some of the monthly cost of living in independently operated recovery residences while admitted to the IOP. Collected data included demographic information and outcome variables. Logistic regression models examined factors associated with recovery residence enrollment. Most participants (80.5%, n = 2258) lived in a recovery residence during IOP. People who were female, Black-only, multiracial, had less education, or a legal history were less likely to live in recovery residences. Those with a prior treatment history, recently unhoused, or with more days abstinent from substances were more likely to live in recovery residences. In short, even with reduced cost barriers, disparities persist in the utilization of recovery residences in conjunction with IOPs, particularly those from historically marginalized groups. Future research should prioritize understanding this utilization gap and developing effective strategies to support individuals in utilizing recovery residences alongside IOP for improved outcomes.
与仅患有物质使用障碍(SUDs)的人相比,患有精神健康和物质使用障碍的人会有更糟糕的结果,包括死亡风险增加。获得安全、稳定的住房,再加上诸如强化门诊项目(IOP)之类的治疗,对早期康复至关重要。然而,那些具有历史上被边缘化身份的人在获得和使用服务方面可能会面临更大的差距。本研究的目的是调查在一个强化门诊项目中接受精神健康障碍和物质使用障碍治疗的成年人在康复住所使用方面的差距。参与者(n = 2803)是作为中西部一家大型治疗机构正在进行的项目评估的一部分招募的,该机构在参与者参加强化门诊项目期间提供部分独立运营的康复住所的每月生活费用。收集的数据包括人口统计学信息和结果变量。逻辑回归模型研究了与康复住所登记相关的因素。大多数参与者(80.5%,n = 2258)在参加强化门诊项目期间住在康复住所。女性、仅为黑人、多种族、受教育程度较低或有犯罪记录的人住在康复住所的可能性较小。有过治疗史、最近无家可归或戒毒天数较多的人住在康复住所的可能性较大。简而言之,即使降低了成本障碍,在与强化门诊项目一起使用康复住所方面的差距仍然存在,尤其是那些来自历史上被边缘化群体的人。未来的研究应优先了解这种使用差距,并制定有效的策略来支持个人在参加强化门诊项目的同时使用康复住所,以改善结果。