Lu Yan, Cai Hua, Chen Liping, Ni Xiaohua, Ji Jianhong, Zhou Yaqing, Liu Yousheng, Jiang Yaqiong, Wang Ying
Department of Obstetrical, Nantong First People's Hospital, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Nantong First People's Hospital, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Sep 5;104(36):e44430. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044430.
This study investigates the clinical value of a structured team approach incorporating shared decision-making in managing critically ill pregnant patients within an obstetrics intensive care unit (ICU).
A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 100 critically ill pregnant women admitted to our hospital's obstetrics ICU between January 2023 and December 2024. Participants were allocated via random number table to either the control group receiving conventional multidisciplinary resuscitation care (n = 50) or the observation group receiving the structured team model with shared decision-making (n = 50). Comparative outcomes included resuscitation efficiency indicators (prehospital response time, intrahospital transport duration, and emergency supply preparation time), complication rates, family psychological status measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and family satisfaction assessments.
The observation group demonstrated significantly shorter time metrics across all resuscitation efficiency parameters compared to the control group (P < .05). Both groups showed reduced Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety and depression scores among family members post-intervention (P < .05 vs baseline), with the observation group achieving superior reductions compared to controls (P < .05). The structured team model group exhibited significantly lower complication rates (6.00% vs 24.00%, P < .05). Family satisfaction assessments revealed higher scores in the intervention group across all domains: medical condition assurance, information accessibility, perceived acceptance, support perception, and comfort maintenance, with total satisfaction scores significantly exceeding those of the control group (P < .05).
The implementation of a structured team framework grounded in shared decision-making principles significantly enhances critical care management for obstetric ICU patients. This model improves resuscitation efficiency, reduces complication risks, mitigates family psychological distress, and elevates family satisfaction levels, demonstrating substantial clinical value for high-risk pregnancy care.
本研究探讨在产科重症监护病房(ICU)中采用结合共同决策的结构化团队方法管理重症孕产妇的临床价值。
对2023年1月至2024年12月期间入住我院产科ICU的100例重症孕产妇进行随机对照试验。通过随机数字表将参与者分为对照组(n = 50),接受传统多学科复苏护理;观察组(n = 50),接受采用共同决策的结构化团队模式。比较的结果包括复苏效率指标(院前反应时间、院内转运时间和应急物资准备时间)、并发症发生率、用医院焦虑抑郁量表测量的家属心理状态以及家属满意度评估。
与对照组相比,观察组在所有复苏效率参数上的时间指标均显著缩短(P < 0.05)。两组干预后家属的医院焦虑抑郁量表焦虑和抑郁评分均降低(与基线相比P < 0.05),观察组降低幅度优于对照组(P < 0.05)。结构化团队模式组的并发症发生率显著更低(6.00% 对24.00%,P < 0.05)。家属满意度评估显示,干预组在所有领域的得分更高:医疗状况保证、信息可及性、感知接纳度、支持感知和舒适度维持,总体满意度得分显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。
基于共同决策原则实施结构化团队框架可显著提高产科ICU患者的重症护理管理水平。该模式提高了复苏效率,降低了并发症风险,减轻了家属的心理困扰,提高了家属满意度,对高危妊娠护理具有重要的临床价值。