Ayaz Zeeshan, Alsarkhi Loiy Naser, Rawat Anurag, Aqel Yousef, Mazhar Maryam, Chaudhari Sandipkumar S, Rauf Mohammed Qasim, Ali Neelum
Medicine, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar, PAK.
Internal Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Cureus. 2025 Aug 8;17(8):e89596. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89596. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Heart failure remains a leading global health burden affecting over 64 million individuals worldwide, with limited effective acute management strategies. Carperitide, a recombinant form of human atrial natriuretic peptide, has been primarily used in Japan for acute heart failure treatment, but its clinical efficacy remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of carperitide in heart failure patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to July 2025, using terms related to carperitide and heart failure. Studies involving adult heart failure patients receiving carperitide that reported cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, or heart failure-related hospitalization were included. Six studies met inclusion criteria, comprising three observational studies, two randomized controlled trials, and one secondary analysis, published between 2008 and 2025. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 4.5.1 (The Cochrane Collaboration) with random-effects models. The pooled analysis of four studies examining all-cause mortality demonstrated no significant difference between carperitide and control groups (risk ratio (RR): 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63-1.66), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 66%). Similarly, hospitalization due to heart failure showed no significant difference (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.85-1.14) with no heterogeneity (I² = 0%). Composite outcomes of hospitalization and death also revealed no significant benefit (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.85-1.14). This meta-analysis provides evidence that carperitide does not significantly improve clinical outcomes in heart failure patients, challenging its widespread use and supporting the need for evidence-based therapeutic alternatives in heart failure management.
心力衰竭仍然是一个主要的全球健康负担,影响着全球超过6400万人,有效的急性管理策略有限。卡培立肽是一种重组形式的人心房利钠肽,主要在日本用于急性心力衰竭的治疗,但其临床疗效仍存在争议。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估卡培立肽在心力衰竭患者中的临床结局。从创刊至2025年7月,在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)中进行了全面的文献检索,使用了与卡培立肽和心力衰竭相关的术语。纳入了涉及接受卡培立肽治疗的成年心力衰竭患者且报告了心血管死亡率、全因死亡率或心力衰竭相关住院情况的研究。六项研究符合纳入标准,包括三项观察性研究、两项随机对照试验和一项二次分析,发表于20 08年至2025年之间。使用RevMan 4.5.1(Cochrane协作网)采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。对四项研究全因死亡率的汇总分析表明,卡培立肽组和对照组之间无显著差异(风险比(RR):1.02,95%置信区间(CI):0.63 - 1.66),存在较大异质性(I² = 66%)。同样,因心力衰竭住院情况也无显著差异(RR:0.98,95% CI:0.85 - 1.14),无异质性(I² = 0%)。住院和死亡的综合结局也未显示出显著益处(RR:0.98,95% CI:0.85 - 1.14)。这项荟萃分析提供了证据,表明卡培立肽并不能显著改善心力衰竭患者的临床结局,对其广泛应用提出了挑战,并支持在心力衰竭管理中需要基于证据的治疗替代方案。