• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创经腹腔内置补片修补术治疗小至中型腹外疝的长期网片相关并发症。

Long-term mesh-related complications from minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh for small to medium-sized ventral hernias.

机构信息

Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.

Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2019-2026. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10716-y. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-10716-y
PMID:38424284
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10978620/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) placement for small to medium-sized hernias has garnered negative attention due to perceived long-term risk of mesh-related complications. However, sparse data exists supporting such claims after minimally invasive (MIS) IPOM repairs and most is hindered by the lack of long-term follow-up. We sought to report long-term outcomes and mesh-related complications of MIS IPOM ventral hernia repairs.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Adult patients who underwent MIS IPOM ventral hernia repair at our institution were identified in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database from October 2013 to October 2020. Outcomes included hernia recurrence and mesh-related complications or reoperations up to 6 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 325 patients were identified. The majority (97.2%) of cases were elective, non-recurrent (74.5%), and CDC class I (99.4%). Mean hernia width was 4.16 ± 3.86 cm. Median follow-up was 3.6 (IQR 2.8-5) years. Surgeon-entered or patient-reported follow-up was available for 253 (77.8%) patients at 3 years or greater postoperatively. One patient experienced an early small bowel obstruction and was reoperated on within 30 days. Two-hundred forty-five radiographic examinations were available up to 6 years postoperatively. Twenty-seven patients had hernia recurrence on radiographic examination up to 6 years postoperatively. During long-term follow-up, two mesh-related complications required reoperations: mesh removed for chronic pain and mesh removal at the time of colon surgery for perforated cancer. Sixteen additional patients required reoperation within 6 years for the following reasons: hernia recurrence (n = 5), unrelated intraabdominal pathology (n = 9), obstructed port site hernia (n = 1), and adhesive bowel obstruction unrelated to the prosthesis (n = 1). The rate of reoperation due to intraperitoneal mesh complications was 0.62% (2/325) with up to 6 year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Intraperitoneal mesh for repair of small to medium-sized hernias has an extremely low rate of long-term mesh-related complications. It remains a safe and durable option for hernia surgeons.

摘要

简介

由于对与网片相关的并发症的长期风险的认识,用于小至中等大小疝的腹腔内补片(IPOM)放置引起了负面关注。然而,微创(MIS)IPOM 修复后的支持此类说法的数据很少,而且大多数数据都受到缺乏长期随访的限制。我们旨在报告 MIS IPOM 腹疝修复的长期结果和与网片相关的并发症。

方法和程序

在我们的腹部核心健康质量协作数据库中,从 2013 年 10 月至 2020 年 10 月,确定了在我们机构接受 MIS IPOM 腹疝修复的成年患者。结果包括术后 6 年内疝复发和与网片相关的并发症或再次手术。

结果

共确定了 325 例患者。大多数(97.2%)病例为择期、非复发性(74.5%)和 CDC Ⅰ级(99.4%)。平均疝宽为 4.16±3.86cm。中位随访时间为 3.6(IQR 2.8-5)年。在术后 3 年或更长时间,有 253(77.8%)例患者可获得外科医生或患者报告的随访。1 例患者术后 30 天内发生早期小肠梗阻并再次手术。245 例患者可获得术后 6 年内的 245 次放射学检查。27 例患者在术后 6 年内通过放射学检查发现疝复发。在长期随访中,有 2 例与网片相关的并发症需要再次手术:因慢性疼痛而切除网片和因穿孔性癌症而切除网片。在 6 年内,另外 16 例患者因以下原因需要再次手术:疝复发(n=5)、腹腔内非相关病变(n=9)、端口疝阻塞(n=1)和与假体无关的粘连性肠梗阻(n=1)。在有 6 年随访的情况下,因腹腔内网片并发症而再次手术的发生率为 0.62%(2/325)。

结论

用于修复小至中等大小疝的腹腔内网片具有极低的长期网片相关并发症发生率。它仍然是疝外科医生的安全且持久的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4786/10978620/ced2bfa92ba2/464_2024_10716_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4786/10978620/76daca60507f/464_2024_10716_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4786/10978620/90660217740b/464_2024_10716_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4786/10978620/ced2bfa92ba2/464_2024_10716_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4786/10978620/76daca60507f/464_2024_10716_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4786/10978620/90660217740b/464_2024_10716_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4786/10978620/ced2bfa92ba2/464_2024_10716_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term mesh-related complications from minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh for small to medium-sized ventral hernias.微创经腹腔内置补片修补术治疗小至中型腹外疝的长期网片相关并发症。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2019-2026. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10716-y. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
2
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
3
Emergency umbilical and epigastric hernia repair: nationwide registry-based study of long-term recurrence, mesh-related, and other complications.急诊脐疝和上腹部疝修补术:基于全国登记系统的长期复发、补片相关及其他并发症研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11792-4.
4
Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair.网片修补与非网片修补用于急诊腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD015160. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015160.pub2.
5
Recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction.腹壁重建后的恢复
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
6
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
7
The epidemiology and risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia surgery.腹股沟疝修补术后复发的流行病学及危险因素
Dan Med J. 2014 May;61(5):B4846.
8
Abandoning mesh "overlap" in favor of "width" and its importance in open retromuscular midline incisional hernia repair: a nationwide database study.放弃网片“重叠”而采用“宽度”及其在开放的肌后中线切口疝修补术中的重要性:一项全国性数据库研究
Hernia. 2025 Jul 29;29(1):237. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03423-7.
9
Comparison of extended view totally extraperitoneal with intraperitoneal onlay mesh for primary ventral hernia surgery: A randomised controlled study from a tertiary university hospital.扩展视野完全腹膜外修补术与腹腔内补片修补术治疗原发性腹疝的比较:一项来自三级大学医院的随机对照研究
J Minim Access Surg. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_52_25.
10
Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias.切口疝的开放手术方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD006438. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006438.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the preferred mesh placement in primary ventral hernia repair? An international survey of 442 surgeons.在原发性腹疝修补术中,哪种补片放置方式更可取?一项针对442名外科医生的国际调查。
Hernia. 2025 Sep 9;29(1):273. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03429-1.
2
Short-term outcomes after robot-assisted retromuscular versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair of small-to-medium ventral hernias: a prospective, multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis.机器人辅助肌后修补与腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补中、小型腹疝的短期疗效:一项前瞻性、多中心、倾向评分匹配分析
Hernia. 2025 Aug 23;29(1):257. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03431-7.
3
Laparosocpic "Intraperitoneal Underlay Mesh"-Plus: A Viable Approach for Incisional-Ventral Hernia Repair.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of subsequent abdominal operations after an initial ventral hernia repair.初次腹疝修补术后后续腹部手术的结果。
Am J Surg. 2023 Dec;226(6):896-900. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.07.044. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
2
Robotic Enhanced-View Totally Extraperitoneal vs Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Evaluation: 1-Year Exploratory Outcomes of the REVEAL Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人增强型完全腹膜外与腹腔内网片上置术评估:REVEAL 随机临床试验的 1 年探索性结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Oct 1;237(4):614-620. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000784. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
3
Robotic eTEP versus IPOM evaluation: the REVEAL multicenter randomized clinical trial.
腹腔镜“腹腔内补片下层修补术”加:一种可行的切口疝修补方法。
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Jun 18;4:14459. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14459. eCollection 2025.
4
Comparative analysis of efficacy and quality of life between totally extraperitoneal sublay and intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for ventral hernia.完全腹膜外衬层修补术与腹腔内置片修补术治疗腹疝的疗效及生活质量对比分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):3179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87555-x.
5
The Unfulfilled Potential of Synthetic and Biological Hydrogel Membranes in the Treatment of Abdominal Hernias.合成与生物水凝胶膜在治疗腹部疝方面未实现的潜力
Gels. 2024 Nov 21;10(12):754. doi: 10.3390/gels10120754.
6
Laparoendoscopic extraperitoneal surgical techniques for ventral hernias and diastasis recti repair: a systematic review.腹腔镜经腹腹膜外手术技术治疗腹疝和腹直肌分离修复:系统评价。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2111-2124. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03144-3. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
7
From Meshes to Minimally Invasive Techniques: A Comprehensive Review of Modern Hernia Repair Approaches.从补片到微创技术:现代疝修补方法的全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Aug 5;16(8):e66206. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66206. eCollection 2024 Aug.
机器人经肛内镜前列腺切除术与经肛微创前列腺切除术评估:REVEAL 多中心随机临床试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2143-2153. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09722-9. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
4
Ring closure outcome for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (IPOM plus) in medium and large defects. Long-term follow-up.腹腔镜腹疝修补术(IPOM 附加术)治疗中大型缺损的环闭结果。长期随访。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2078-2084. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09738-1. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
5
Open versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal on-lay mesh repair: A comparison of outcomes in small ventral hernia.开放与腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补术:小切口腹疝修补效果比较
Asian J Surg. 2023 Feb;46(2):712-717. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.06.153. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
6
Comparison of extended totally extra peritoneal (eTEP) vs intra peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair for management of primary and incisional hernia in terms of early outcomes and cost effectiveness-a randomized controlled trial.对比完全腹膜外(eTEP)与经腹腔内补片置入术(IPOM)在原发性和切口疝治疗中的早期结果和成本效益:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7494-7502. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09180-3. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
7
Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive retromuscular ventral hernia repair using an enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach: systematic review and meta-analysis.采用增强型完全腹膜外(eTEP)入路微创经肌后腹疝修补术的短期疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2022 Dec;26(6):1511-1520. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02557-8. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
8
Effect of Hernia Mesh Weights on Postoperative Patient-Related and Clinical Outcomes After Open Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial.疝补片重量对开放式腹外疝修补术后患者相关和临床结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Dec 1;156(12):1085-1092. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4309.
9
Establishing the minimal clinically important difference for the Hernia-Related Quality of Life Survey (HerQLes).确定疝气相关生活质量调查问卷(HerQLes)的最小临床重要差异。
Am J Surg. 2022 Feb;223(2):245-249. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
10
What are the trends in incisional hernia repair? Real-world data over 10 years from the Herniamed registry.切口疝修补术的发展趋势是什么?来自 Herniamed 登记处的 10 年真实世界数据。
Hernia. 2021 Apr;25(2):255-265. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02319-y. Epub 2020 Oct 19.