Suppr超能文献

择期心脏手术中远程医疗术前评估后的手术结果

Surgical outcomes following telehealth preoperative evaluation in elective cardiac surgery.

作者信息

Chukwudi Chijioke, Singh Ruby, Vinholo Thais Faggion, Grobman Ben, Udeh Patrick, Sabe Ashraf, Shin Borami, D'Alessandro David A, Sundt Thoralf M, Osho Asishana A

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

出版信息

JTCVS Open. 2025 Jun 26;26:138-146. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.06.010. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Telehealth preoperative evaluations have been shown to improve access to care, reduce appointment cancellations, and support efficient procedural planning across multiple surgical subspecialties. However, few studies have assessed the safety and efficacy in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multi-institutional cohort study comparing procedural and postoperative outcomes for patients who had telehealth versus in-person preoperative evaluations for elective cardiac surgery between March 1, 2020, and March 1, 2021. Primary outcome was 1-year mortality assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression. Secondary outcomes of procedural duration, reoperations, readmission, deep vein thrombosis, postoperative rebleeding, sepsis, prolonged ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay, and hospital length of stay were assessed using multivariable linear or logistic regression.

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-nine patients who were evaluated through telehealth and 554 patients who were evaluated in person were included. The telehealth group had fewer women, smokers, dialysis-dependent patients, and patients on Medicare/Medicaid (all values < .05); they underwent more isolated mitral (27% vs 20%; = .006), and fewer isolated aortic procedures (3% vs 5%; = .005). Adjusted 1-year mortality was similar between both groups (adjusted hazard ratio, .8; 95% CI, 04-1.4; = .371). There was no difference in secondary outcomes between the 2 groups (all values > .05). We found no difference in the proportion of patients with high Social Vulnerability Index between groups (12% vs 14%; = .28). More telehealth patients resided further than 67 miles from the hospital (23% vs 17%; = .03) and had median savings of 2.4 gas-gallons (range, 1.0-4.6 gas-gallons and 91.8 minutes (range, 39.6-182 minutes) of travel time.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that telehealth may be efficiently and safely used for preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.

摘要

目的

远程医疗术前评估已被证明可改善医疗服务的可及性,减少预约取消,并支持多个外科亚专业的高效手术规划。然而,很少有研究评估择期心脏手术患者的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性多机构队列研究,比较了2020年3月1日至2021年3月1日期间接受远程医疗与面对面术前评估的择期心脏手术患者的手术及术后结果。主要结局是使用Kaplan-Meier曲线和多变量Cox回归评估的1年死亡率。使用多变量线性或逻辑回归评估手术持续时间、再次手术、再入院、深静脉血栓形成、术后再出血、败血症、通气延长、重症监护病房住院时间和住院时间等次要结局。

结果

纳入了559例通过远程医疗评估的患者和554例接受面对面评估的患者。远程医疗组女性、吸烟者、依赖透析的患者以及参加医疗保险/医疗补助的患者较少(所有P值<0.05);他们接受单纯二尖瓣手术的比例更高(27%对20%;P = 0.006),而单纯主动脉手术的比例更低(3%对5%;P = 0.005)。两组调整后的1年死亡率相似(调整后的风险比,0.8;95%置信区间,0.4-1.4;P = 0.371)。两组的次要结局没有差异(所有P值>0.05)。我们发现两组之间社会脆弱性指数高的患者比例没有差异(12%对14%;P = 0.28)。更多的远程医疗患者居住在距离医院超过67英里的地方(23%对17%;P = 0.03),节省的汽油中位数为2.4加仑(范围,1.0-4.6加仑),出行时间节省91.8分钟(范围,39.6-182分钟)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,远程医疗可有效且安全地用于择期心脏手术患者的术前评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb13/12414432/e9c97913d456/ga1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验