Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2255994. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55994.
Bariatric surgery is the mainstay of treatment for medically refractory obesity; however, it is underutilized. Telemedicine affords patient cost and time savings and may increase availability and accessibility of bariatric surgery.
To determine clinical outcomes and postoperative hospital utilization for patients undergoing bariatric surgery who receive fully remote vs in-person preoperative care.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study comparing postoperative clinical outcomes and hospital utilization after telemedicine or in-person preoperative surgical evaluation included patients treated at a US academic hospital. Participants underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy after telemedicine or in-person preoperative surgical evaluation between July 1, 2020, to December 22, 2021, or January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019, respectively. Follow-up was 60 days from date of surgery.
Telemedicine-based preoperative care.
Clinical outcomes, including operating room delay, procedure duration, length of hospital stay (LOS), and major adverse events (MAE), and postoperative hospital resource utilization, including emergency department (ED) visit or hospital readmission within 30 days of the surgical procedure.
A total of 1182 patients were included; patients in the telemedicine group were younger (mean [SD] age, 40.8 [12.5] years vs 43.0 [12.2] years; P = .01) and more likely to be female (230 of 257 [89.5%] vs 766 of 925 [82.8%]; P = .01) compared with the control group. The control group had a higher frequency of comorbidity (887 of 925 [95.9%] vs 208 of 257 [80.9%]; P < .001). The telemedicine group was found to be noninferior to the control group with respect to operating room delay (mean [SD] minutes, 7.8 [25.1]; 95% CI, 5.1-10.5 vs 4.2 [11.1]; 95% CI, 1.0-7.4; P = .002), procedure duration (mean [SD] minutes, 134.4 [52.8]; 95% CI, 130.9-137.8 vs 105.3 [41.5]; 95% CI, 100.2-110.4; P < .001), LOS (mean [SD] days, 1.9 [1.1]; 95% CI, 1.8-1.9 vs 2.1 [1.0]; 95% CI, 1.9-2.2; P < .001), MAE within 30 days (3.8%; 95% CI, 3.0%-5.7% vs 1.6%; 95% CI, 0.4%-3.9%; P = .001), MAE between 31 and 60 days (2.2%; 95% CI, 1.3%-3.3% vs 1.6%; 95% CI, 0.4%-3.9%; P < .001), frequency of ER visits (18.8%; 95% CI, 16.3%-21.4% vs 17.9%; 95% CI, 13.2%-22.6%; P = .03), and hospital readmission (10.1%; 95% CI, 8.1%-12.0% vs 6.6%; 95% CI, 3.9%-10.4%; P = .02).
In this cohort study, clinical outcomes in the telemedicine group were not inferior to the control group. This observation suggests that telemedicine can be used safely and effectively for bariatric surgical preoperative care.
减重手术是治疗医学上难治性肥胖的主要方法;然而,它的应用不足。远程医疗为患者节省了成本和时间,并且可能增加减重手术的可及性。
确定接受远程医疗和面对面术前护理的患者进行减重手术后的临床结果和术后医院利用情况。
设计、设置和参与者:本队列研究比较了接受远程医疗或面对面术前手术评估的患者在接受腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术或腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗后的术后临床结果和医院利用情况。参与者分别于 2020 年 7 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 22 日或 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日之间接受远程医疗或面对面术前手术评估。随访时间为手术日期后 60 天。
基于远程医疗的术前护理。
临床结果,包括手术室延迟、手术持续时间、住院时间(LOS)和主要不良事件(MAE),以及术后医院资源利用情况,包括术后 30 天内急诊部(ED)就诊或住院再入院。
共纳入 1182 名患者;远程医疗组患者年龄更小(平均[标准差]年龄,40.8[12.5]岁 vs 43.0[12.2]岁;P = .01),更可能为女性(230/257[89.5%] vs 766/925[82.8%];P = .01)。对照组的合并症发生率更高(887/925[95.9%] vs 208/257[80.9%];P < .001)。与对照组相比,远程医疗组在手术室延迟(平均[标准差]分钟,7.8[25.1];95%置信区间,5.1-10.5 比 4.2[11.1];95%置信区间,1.0-7.4;P = .002)、手术持续时间(平均[标准差]分钟,134.4[52.8];95%置信区间,130.9-137.8 比 105.3[41.5];95%置信区间,100.2-110.4;P < .001)、住院时间(平均[标准差]天,1.9[1.1];95%置信区间,1.8-1.9 比 2.1[1.0];95%置信区间,1.9-2.2;P < .001)、30 天内 MAE(3.8%;95%置信区间,3.0%-5.7% 比 1.6%;95%置信区间,0.4%-3.9%;P = .001)、31-60 天内 MAE(2.2%;95%置信区间,1.3%-3.3% 比 1.6%;95%置信区间,0.4%-3.9%;P < .001)、急诊部就诊频率(18.8%;95%置信区间,16.3%-21.4% 比 17.9%;95%置信区间,13.2%-22.6%;P = .03)和住院再入院率(10.1%;95%置信区间,8.1%-12.0% 比 6.6%;95%置信区间,3.9%-10.4%;P = .02)方面,远程医疗组的结果并不劣于对照组。这一观察结果表明,远程医疗可安全有效地用于减重手术的术前护理。