• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性医疗环境中伦理安全问卷的心理测量特性——一项横断面研究。

Psychometric properties of the ethical safety questionnaire in acute healthcare environments - a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Grech Adrienne, Naamanka Kati, Mattsson Janet, Pakpour Amir, Kivelä Suvi, Cassar Maria, Manninen Katri, Circenis Kristaps, Melbārde-Kelmere Agita, Korsström Nina, Marqués-Sule Elena, Cortés-Amador Sara, Hernández-Guillén David, Poikkeus Tarja, Björling Gunilla

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Valetta, Malta.

Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Sep 8;26(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01279-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-025-01279-1
PMID:40926248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12418658/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ethical safety supports the development of ethical competencies and sound decision-making, central to good healthcare practice. The Ethical Safety Questionnaire (ESQ) evaluates ethical safety in healthcare environments, based on three subscales; ,, The objective of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the ESQ in acute healthcare environments.

METHODS

The domain development of the ESQ was carried out in Finland in 2019. The ESQ was translated into English, Latvian and Swedish. To determine the validity of the ESQ, a cross-sectional design was used. Data was collected from nurses and physiotherapists ( = 275) in Sweden, Finland, Latvia and Malta, using purposive sampling. The validation (in all languages) consisted of an exploratory factor analysis, Rasch analysis and network analysis. This assessed the ESQ for internal consistency and construct validity. Ethical approval was granted from all participating countries in accordance with national law and the Declaration of Helsinki.

RESULTS

The internal consistency for the three subscales of the ESQ, ,,, was satisfactory, with Cronbach’s α coefficients (> 0.7) and McDonald’s omega coefficients (> 0.7). All corrected item-total correlations among the items of the ESQ were high, exceeding 0.6. Thus, the ESQ exhibits acceptable levels of internal consistency and construct validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the ESQ is a reliable tool for evaluating ethical safety in healthcare environments. However, the two general items in the ESQ can be omitted without loss of scale validity.

摘要

背景

道德安全有助于培养道德能力和做出合理决策,这是优质医疗实践的核心。道德安全问卷(ESQ)基于三个分量表评估医疗环境中的道德安全。本研究的目的是确定ESQ在急性医疗环境中的心理测量特性。

方法

ESQ的领域开发于2019年在芬兰进行。ESQ被翻译成英语、拉脱维亚语和瑞典语。为了确定ESQ的有效性,采用了横断面设计。通过立意抽样从瑞典、芬兰、拉脱维亚和马耳他的护士和物理治疗师(n = 275)中收集数据。验证(所有语言)包括探索性因素分析、拉施分析和网络分析。这评估了ESQ的内部一致性和结构效度。根据国内法律和《赫尔辛基宣言》,所有参与国家均获得了伦理批准。

结果

ESQ三个分量表的内部一致性令人满意,克朗巴赫α系数(> 0.7)和麦克唐纳ω系数(> 0.7)。ESQ各项之间所有校正后的项目-总分相关性都很高,超过0.6。因此,ESQ表现出可接受的内部一致性和结构效度水平。

结论

结果表明,ESQ是评估医疗环境中道德安全的可靠工具。然而,ESQ中的两个一般项目可以省略而不影响量表效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b2a/12418658/4a1ca3a68f3f/12910_2025_1279_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b2a/12418658/03b1eaaae6e0/12910_2025_1279_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b2a/12418658/4a1ca3a68f3f/12910_2025_1279_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b2a/12418658/03b1eaaae6e0/12910_2025_1279_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b2a/12418658/4a1ca3a68f3f/12910_2025_1279_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the ethical safety questionnaire in acute healthcare environments - a cross-sectional study.急性医疗环境中伦理安全问卷的心理测量特性——一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Sep 8;26(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01279-1.
2
Assessing safety climate in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of the adequacy of the psychometric properties of survey measurement tools.评估急症医院环境中的安全氛围:对调查测量工具心理测量特性充分性的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 10;18(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3167-x.
3
Ethical Awareness in the Use of Large Language Models: Development and Validation of a Scale for Healthcare Professionals.医疗专业人员使用大语言模型时的伦理意识:一种量表的开发与验证
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70241. doi: 10.1111/jep.70241.
4
Psychometric properties of an Iranian instrument for assessing adherence to ethical principles in the use of artificial intelligence among healthcare providers.一种用于评估医疗服务提供者在使用人工智能时遵守道德原则情况的伊朗工具的心理测量特性。
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Nov;203:106019. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106019. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
5
Understanding Employees' Attitudes and Awareness of Code of Ethics and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Survey at a Public Tertiary Hospital in Croatia.了解员工对道德准则的态度和认知及其相关因素:克罗地亚一家公立三级医院的横断面调查
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 27;13(17):2131. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172131.
6
Investigating ethical considerations in the communication network of married women undergone hysterectomy: instrumentation of a questionnaire.调查接受子宫切除术的已婚女性沟通网络中的伦理考量:问卷编制
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01152-7.
7
Care and justice reasoning in nurses' everyday ethics.护士日常伦理中的关怀与正义推理。
Nurs Ethics. 2025 Sep;32(6):1771-1782. doi: 10.1177/09697330241312379. Epub 2025 Jan 5.
8
Ethical dilemmas concerning orthodontic treatment among orthodontists in a sample from Saudi Arabia: a pilot study.沙特阿拉伯样本中正畸医生面临的正畸治疗伦理困境:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jan 16;26(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01142-9.
9
Advancing artificial intelligence ethics in health and genomics: lessons from a public survey in South Korea.推进健康与基因组学领域的人工智能伦理:来自韩国一项公众调查的经验教训。
Front Genet. 2025 Jul 9;16:1563544. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1563544. eCollection 2025.
10
The psychometric properties of depression screening tools in primary healthcare settings: A systematic review.在基层医疗环境中使用的抑郁筛查工具的心理计量学特性:一项系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Jan 1;225:503-522. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.060. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
"Moral spaces": A feasibility study to build nurses' ethical confidence and competence.“道德空间”:一项增强护士道德自信与能力的可行性研究
Nurs Ethics. 2025 May;32(3):782-797. doi: 10.1177/09697330241284356. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
2
Moral distress interventions: An integrative literature review.道德困境干预措施:综合文献回顾。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 May;29(3):582-607. doi: 10.1177/09697330211035489. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
3
Professional autonomy in nursing: An integrative review.护理专业自主性:综合述评。
J Nurs Manag. 2021 Sep;29(6):1565-1577. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13282. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
4
Moral Distress, Mattering, and Secondary Traumatic Stress in Provider Burnout: A Call for Moral Community.医疗人员职业耗竭中的道德困境、意义感缺失和继发性创伤压力:呼唤道德共同体
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2020 Jun 15;31(2):146-157. doi: 10.4037/aacnacc2020285.
5
Relationship between autonomy and moral distress in emergency nurses.急诊护士的自主性与道德困扰之间的关系。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2019 Jan-Mar;4(1):20-25. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2018.076. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
6
Relationships between organizational and individual support, nurses' ethical competence, ethical safety, and work satisfaction.组织和个人支持、护士伦理能力、伦理安全与工作满意度之间的关系。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2020 Jan/Mar;45(1):83-93. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000195.
7
Ethics interventions for healthcare professionals and students: A systematic review.医学伦理干预对医疗保健专业人员和学生的影响:系统评价。
Nurs Ethics. 2018 Mar;25(2):133-152. doi: 10.1177/0969733017700237. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
8
Are nurse-led chemotherapy clinics really nurse-led? An ethnographic study.由护士主导的化疗诊所真的是由护士主导吗?一项人种志研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Apr;69:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
9
Using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) on patients with epilepsy: Confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch models.在癫痫患者中使用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS):验证性因素分析和拉施模型
Seizure. 2017 Feb;45:42-46. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.11.019. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
10
Institutional Ethics Resources: Creating Moral Spaces.机构伦理资源:创造道德空间。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2016 Sep;46 Suppl 1:S22-7. doi: 10.1002/hast.627.