Suppr超能文献

在电子健康记录中识别酒精使用障碍的严重程度等级。

Identifying levels of alcohol use disorder severity in electronic health records.

作者信息

Manthey Jakob, Kilian Carolin, Kraus Ludwig, Schäfer Ingo, Schranz Anna, Schulte Bernd

机构信息

Centre for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research (ZIS), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Semmelweisstraße 10, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2025 Sep 8;20(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13011-025-00670-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is conceptualized as a dimensional phenomenon in the DSM-5, but electronic health records (EHRs) rely on binary AUD definitions according to the ICD-10. The present study classifies AUD severity levels using EHR data and tests whether increasing AUD severity levels are linked with increased comorbidity.

METHODS

Billing data from two German statutory health insurance companies in Hamburg included n = 21,954 adults diagnosed with alcohol-specific conditions between 2017 and 2021. Based on ICD-10 alcohol-specific diagnoses, patients were classified into five AUD severity levels: 1 (F10.0, T51.0 or T51.9); 2 (F10.1); 3 (F10.2); 4 (F10.3/4); 5 (K70 + or one of the following diagnoses: K70.0-4, K70.9, K85.2, K85.20, K86.0, 10.5-9, E24.4, G31.2, G62.1, G72.1, I42.6, K29.2). Generalized estimating equation regression models for count data (Poisson distribution) were used to assess associations with the Elixhauser Comorbidity Score (ECS).

RESULTS

Across the study period, the annual prevalence of any AUD diagnosis varied between 2.7% and 2.9%. A dose-response relationship was observed between AUD severity and ECS, indicating that individuals with higher AUD severity experience more comorbid conditions, particularly cardiovascular and liver diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposal to define AUD severity levels based on ICD-10 diagnoses allows for a more nuanced analysis of AUD in EHR data.

摘要

背景

酒精使用障碍(AUD)在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM - 5)中被概念化为一种维度现象,但电子健康记录(EHRs)根据国际疾病分类第10版(ICD - 10)依赖二元AUD定义。本研究使用EHR数据对AUD严重程度水平进行分类,并测试AUD严重程度增加是否与共病增加相关。

方法

来自汉堡两家德国法定健康保险公司的计费数据包括2017年至2021年间被诊断患有酒精特定疾病的n = 21,954名成年人。基于ICD - 10酒精特定诊断,患者被分为五个AUD严重程度水平:1(F10.0、T51.0或T51.9);2(F10.1);3(F10.2);4(F10.3/4);5(K70 +或以下诊断之一:K70.0 - 4、K70.9、K85.2、K85. .20、K86.0、I0.5 - 9、E24.4、G31.2、G62.1、G72.1、I42.6、K29.2)。用于计数数据(泊松分布)的广义估计方程回归模型用于评估与埃利克斯豪泽共病评分(ECS)的关联。

结果

在整个研究期间,任何AUD诊断的年患病率在2.7%至2.9%之间变化。观察到AUD严重程度与ECS之间存在剂量反应关系,表明AUD严重程度较高的个体共病情况更多,特别是心血管和肝脏疾病。

结论

基于ICD - 10诊断定义AUD严重程度水平的提议允许对EHR数据中的AUD进行更细致入微的分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验