Hubbard Katherine A
University of Surrey, UK.
Hist Human Sci. 2025 Apr 10;38(3-4):239-259. doi: 10.1177/09526951251328114. eCollection 2025 Jul-Oct.
Margaret Lowenfeld (1890-1973) and Margaret Mead (1901-78) met in 1948. This eventful first meeting in London was the start of a fascinating working friendship, albeit a somewhat uneven one. The two women share particular similarities across their careers, including their positions as women in their respective fields of psychology and anthropology, though Mead was notably more renowned. They also both had substantial and long-lasting relationships with other women. In this article, I draw primarily upon archival resources of interviews with both Mead and Rhoda Métraux conducted about Lowenfeld following her death. In doing so I argue how such material not only reveals the type of relationship between Lowenfeld and Mead, but also raises questions about how lesbian relationships are historically understood. In recognising the queer worlds of these women, it is possible to extend historical thinking about the lesbian relationships they had. Crucially, it also demonstrates what a lesbian feminist historical approach uniquely provides. In addition to this, by likewise recognising myself as a queer feminist, it is possible to reveal the reflexive and emotional queer kinship which extends between historian and subject.
玛格丽特·洛温菲尔德(1890 - 1973)和玛格丽特·米德(1901 - 1978)于1948年相识。在伦敦举行的这次意义重大的首次会面,开启了一段引人入胜的工作友谊,尽管这段友谊有些不平衡。这两位女性在各自的职业生涯中有诸多特别的相似之处,包括她们在心理学和人类学各自领域中作为女性的地位,尽管米德的知名度要高得多。她们还都与其他女性有着深厚且持久的关系。在本文中,我主要借鉴了关于洛温菲尔德去世后对米德和罗达·梅特劳克斯进行的访谈的档案资料。通过这样做,我论证了这些材料不仅揭示了洛温菲尔德和米德之间的关系类型,还引发了关于女同性恋关系在历史上如何被理解的问题。在认识到这些女性的酷儿世界后,有可能拓展对她们所拥有的女同性恋关系的历史思考。至关重要的是,这也展示了女同性恋女权主义历史方法所独特提供的东西。除此之外,通过同样将自己视为一名酷儿女权主义者,有可能揭示出在历史学家与研究对象之间延伸的反思性和情感性的酷儿亲属关系。