Hubbard Katherine
Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, UK.
J Hist Behav Sci. 2017 Jul;53(3):265-285. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.21863. Epub 2017 May 30.
As queer history is often hidden, historians must look for "signs" that hint at queer lives and experiences. When psychologists use projective tests, the search for queer signs has historically been more literal, and this was especially true in the homophobic practices of Psychology in the mid-twentieth century. In this paper, I respond to Elizabeth Scarborough's call for more analytic history about the lesser known women in Psychology's history. By focusing on British projective research conducted by lesbian psychologist June Hopkins, I shift perspective and consider, not those who were tested (which has been historically more common), but those who did the testing, and position them as potential queer subjects. After briefly outlining why the projective test movement is ripe for such analysis and the kinds of queer signs that were identified using the Rorschach ink blot test in the mid-twentieth century, I then present June Hopkins' (1969, 1970) research on the "lesbian personality." This work forms a framework upon which I then consider the lives of Margaret Lowenfeld, Ann Kaldegg, and Effie Lillian Hutton, all of whom were involved in the British projective test movement a generation prior to Hopkins. By adopting Hopkins' research to frame their lives, I present the possibility of this ambiguous history being distinctly queer.
由于同性恋历史常常被隐藏,历史学家必须寻找暗示同性恋生活和经历的“迹象”。当心理学家使用投射测验时,对同性恋迹象的探寻在历史上更为直白,在20世纪中叶心理学的恐同实践中尤其如此。在本文中,我回应伊丽莎白·斯卡伯勒的呼吁,即对心理学历史上鲜为人知的女性进行更多分析性的历史研究。通过聚焦女同性恋心理学家琼·霍普金斯进行的英国投射研究,我转换视角,考虑的不是那些接受测试的人(这在历史上更为常见),而是那些进行测试的人,并将她们定位为潜在的同性恋主体。在简要概述为什么投射测验运动适合进行这样的分析,以及20世纪中叶使用罗夏墨迹测验识别出的同性恋迹象类型之后,我接着介绍琼·霍普金斯(1969年、1970年)关于“女同性恋人格”的研究。这项工作形成了一个框架,在此基础上我进而考察玛格丽特·洛温菲尔德、安·卡尔德格和埃菲·莉莲·赫顿的生活,她们都比霍普金斯早一代参与了英国投射测验运动。通过采用霍普金斯的研究来勾勒她们的生活,我展现了这段模糊历史明显具有同性恋特征的可能性。