Chuinsiri Nontawat, Thammanichanon Peungchaleoy, Puttaravuttiporn Pornputthi, Mongkolchart Wittawat, Chudet Chadatorn, Thongraksri Sirada
Institute of Dentistry, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Oral Health Centre, Suranaree University of Technology Hospital, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Front Oral Health. 2025 Aug 25;6:1622386. doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1622386. eCollection 2025.
Oral behaviours, both functional and non-functional, are commonly reported and can negatively impact oral health. Among orofacial pain patients, non-functional oral behaviours have been observed in association with elevated psychosocial factors. However, the extent to which these findings apply to individuals without orofacial pain remains inconclusive. This study examined the latent constructs of oral behaviours and their associations with somatic symptoms and psychological distress in orofacial pain-free adults.
This multi-centre cross-sectional study recruited 194 participants who were free of orofacial pain. All participants provided informed consent and completed a set of self-reported questionnaires, including the Oral Behaviour Checklist-21, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-15 for assessing somatic symptoms and the PHQ-4 for assessing psychological distress. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify latent constructs underlying the observed questionnaire item responses. Correlations between questionnaire scores were assessed using the Spearman's rank correlation test. A value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The mean age of participants was 24.6 ± 6.2 years, and 70% were female. Exploratory factor analysis identified three distinct latent constructs of oral behaviours: tooth-contact bruxism, non-tooth-contact bruxism and other jaw loading behaviours. Overall oral behaviours, sleep-state behaviours, awake-state behaviours and the EFA-derived constructs showed statistically significant positive correlations with both somatic symptoms and psychological distress.
In addition to being classified by sleep and awake states, oral behaviours can be grouped into tooth-contact bruxism, non-tooth-contact bruxism and other jaw loading behaviours. The significant correlations observed among oral behaviours, somatic symptoms and psychological distress suggest that individuals reporting frequent oral behaviours should be further evaluated for underlying psychosocial factors, even in the absence of orofacial pain.
无论是功能性还是非功能性的口腔行为都很常见,并且会对口腔健康产生负面影响。在口面部疼痛患者中,已观察到非功能性口腔行为与心理社会因素升高有关。然而,这些发现适用于无口面部疼痛个体的程度仍无定论。本研究调查了无口面部疼痛成年人的口腔行为潜在结构及其与躯体症状和心理困扰的关联。
这项多中心横断面研究招募了194名无口面部疼痛的参与者。所有参与者均提供了知情同意书,并完成了一套自我报告问卷量表,包括21项口腔行为检查表、用于评估躯体症状的患者健康问卷(PHQ)-15和用于评估心理困扰的PHQ-4。进行探索性因素分析(EFA)以识别观察到的问卷项目反应背后的潜在结构。使用Spearman等级相关检验评估问卷分数之间的相关性。P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
参与者的平均年龄为24.6±6.2岁,70%为女性。探索性因素分析确定了三种不同的口腔行为潜在结构:牙齿接触性磨牙症、非牙齿接触性磨牙症和其他颌骨负荷行为。总体口腔行为、睡眠状态行为、清醒状态行为以及EFA得出的结构与躯体症状和心理困扰均呈统计学显著正相关。
除了按睡眠和清醒状态分类外,口腔行为还可分为牙齿接触性磨牙症、非牙齿接触性磨牙症和其他颌骨负荷行为。口腔行为、躯体症状和心理困扰之间观察到的显著相关性表明,即使没有口面部疼痛,报告频繁口腔行为的个体也应进一步评估潜在的心理社会因素。