Sadyrova Mary, Martin Emily, Ramsey Philip, Bullington Lorinda
MPG Ranch Florence Montana USA.
Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences University of Montana Missoula Montana USA.
Ecol Evol. 2025 Sep 7;15(9):e72102. doi: 10.1002/ece3.72102. eCollection 2025 Sep.
DNA fecal metabarcoding has revolutionized the field of herbivore diet analyses, offering deeper insight into plant-herbivore interactions and more reliable ecological inferences. However, due to PCR amplification bias, primer selection has a major impact on the validity of these inferences and insights. Using two pooling approaches on four mock communities and a case study examining diets of four large mammalian herbivores (LMH), we evaluated the efficacy of two primer pairs targeting the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region: the widely used ITS-S2F/ITS4 pair and the UniPlant F/R pair, designed specifically for DNA metabarcoding. Both primer pairs consistently underrepresented graminoids, where > 40% of graminoid species did not amplify in vitro. However, the UniPlant F/R primer pair more accurately amplified mock plant communities, whereas the ITS-S2F/ITS4 pair underestimated graminoid relative abundance by at least twofold more than UniPlant F/R primers. Furthermore, in the LMH case study, UniPlant F/R primers identified graminoids as the dominant plant group for at least one LMH, indicating diet niche partitioning, while ITS-S2F/ITS4 primers largely failed to amplify graminoid DNA, potentially overestimating LMH diet overlap. Our findings underscore the importance of incorporating mock community analyses into DNA metabarcoding protocols to identify and mitigate primer bias, thereby enhancing the accuracy of ecological conclusions and supporting more effective conservation and management decisions.
DNA粪便宏条形码技术彻底改变了食草动物饮食分析领域,为植物 - 食草动物相互作用提供了更深入的见解以及更可靠的生态推断。然而,由于PCR扩增偏差,引物选择对这些推断和见解的有效性有重大影响。我们在四个模拟群落上使用两种合并方法,并通过一个研究四种大型哺乳动物食草动物(LMH)饮食的案例研究,评估了针对内转录间隔区2(ITS2)区域的两种引物对的效果:广泛使用的ITS - S2F/ITS4引物对和专门为DNA宏条形码技术设计的UniPlant F/R引物对。两种引物对都始终未能充分代表禾本科植物,其中超过40%的禾本科植物物种在体外无法扩增。然而,UniPlant F/R引物对能更准确地扩增模拟植物群落,而ITS - S2F/ITS4引物对低估禾本科植物的相对丰度至少比UniPlant F/R引物多两倍。此外,在LMH案例研究中,UniPlant F/R引物将禾本科植物确定为至少一种LMH的主要植物类群,表明饮食生态位划分,而ITS - S2F/ITS4引物在很大程度上未能扩增禾本科植物DNA,可能高估了LMH饮食重叠度。我们的研究结果强调了将模拟群落分析纳入DNA宏条形码技术方案以识别和减轻引物偏差的重要性,从而提高生态结论的准确性,并支持更有效的保护和管理决策。