Suri Pooja, Sd Sahana, Yan Shirley, Murthy Seema, Johnston Jamie Sewan
School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
YosAid Innovation Foundation, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 10;20(9):e0327986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327986. eCollection 2025.
In this study, we examine the dynamics of birthing women relative to other family members in making caregiving decisions about postpartum maternal and infant care in four states in India. Specifically, we investigate the involvement of the father, maternal grandmother, and paternal grandmother of the newborn in household health decision-making.
We analyze data from 551 dyads of women with infants under six months and the family caregiver identified as providing the primary support in the postpartum period. We present descriptive statistics on 1) the identity of the primary decision-maker as independently reported by birthing women and caregivers and 2) how disagreements are resolved. Within each dyad, we examine the level of agreement on health decision-making between mothers and caregivers. We use regression models to analyze the association between caregiver identity, and postpartum outcomes.
Our findings show that decisions in the household are predominantly made by a single person (around 70 percent), either the birthing woman or one of the caregivers - the father, maternal grandmother, or paternal grandmother of the newborn. Across all dyads, birthing women are more likely than other household members to name their caregivers as the sole decision-makers for infant care and their own. The involvement of birthing women in household decision-making is low, with less than a third of birthing women reporting involvement in either. Within-dyad agreement on the identity of sole decision-makers is low, with less than 30 percent of dyads in agreement for both infant and maternal care decision-making. Birthing women experience a higher level of mental well-being on a normalized index by 0.12 standard deviations (sd) when their primary caregiver is their own mother. In contrast, the mental well-being of the birthing women is negatively impacted by 0.10 sd when the caregiver is the mother-in-law. We also observe that the type of caregiver significantly impacts postpartum recovery of the birthing woman. Specifically, birthing women whose caregivers are mothers-in-law are 16.2 percentage points less likely to be well post-delivery. These findings enhance our understanding of the gendered role of caregivers in postnatal care in India, providing new insights into how caregiving and decision-making responsibilities are distributed within families.
在本研究中,我们考察了印度四个邦分娩女性在就产后母婴护理做出照料决策时相对于其他家庭成员的动态情况。具体而言,我们调查了新生儿的父亲、外祖母和祖母在家庭健康决策中的参与情况。
我们分析了551对母婴的数据,这些母婴中的婴儿年龄在六个月以下,且家庭照料者被确定为在产后提供主要支持的人。我们呈现了关于以下两方面的描述性统计数据:1)分娩女性和照料者独立报告的主要决策者身份;2)分歧如何解决。在每一对母婴中,我们考察了母亲和照料者在健康决策上的一致程度。我们使用回归模型来分析照料者身份与产后结果之间的关联。
我们的研究结果表明,家庭决策主要由一个人做出(约70%),这个人要么是分娩女性,要么是照料者之一——新生儿 的父亲、外祖母或祖母。在所有母婴对中,分娩女性比其他家庭成员更有可能将她们的照料者指定为婴儿护理和自身护理的唯一决策者。分娩女性在家庭决策中的参与度较低,不到三分之一的分娩女性报告参与了任何一项决策。在唯一决策者身份上的母婴对内部一致性较低,不到30%的母婴对在婴儿和产妇护理决策上都达成一致。当主要照料者是自己的母亲时,分娩女性在标准化指数上的心理健康水平会高出0.12个标准差(sd)。相比之下,当照料者是婆婆时,分娩女性的心理健康会受到0.10个标准差的负面影响。我们还观察到,照料者的类型会显著影响分娩女性的产后恢复。具体而言,照料者是婆婆的分娩女性产后恢复良好的可能性要低16.2个百分点。这些发现增进了我们对印度产后护理中照料者性别角色的理解,为家庭内部照料和决策责任的分配提供了新的见解。