Alvarez-Leite Maria Eugênia, Alves Flávia Araújo, Cardozo Adrielly Ferreira, Ribeiro Pedro Aleixo Garcia Paim, Gomes Victor de Morais, Vieira Cristina Dutra, Lana Márcia Almeida, Antunes Alberto Nogueira da Gama
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC-Minas, Institute of Biological and Health Sciences, Dentistry Department, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Newton Paiva Ferreira Cultural Institute, School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2025 Sep 8;39:e085. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.085. eCollection 2025.
The contamination of dental curing light tips was evaluated before and after treatment and after their use and disinfection. The influence of a plastic protective barrier over the flexural strength and the modulus of elasticity of resin composites were also analyzed. Microbiological sampling was conducted at initial contamination (T0), in Log 10 CFU/4 mL; after dental treatment (T1); and after disinfection with 70% ethanol (v/v) (T2). The results were analyzed by descriptive statistics and analysis of variance. The flexural strength and the modulus of elasticity analyses were performed using bar-shaped test specimens of three commercial resin composites with and without barriers, and the tests were subjected to a statistical normality test. Turbidity was observed in the media in 60.7% of the tubes at T0, 100.0% at T1, and 57.1% at T2. The microbial contamination was similar at T0 and T2, but a significant increase was observed at T1. The recovered microbial load differed significantly between T1 and T2 (p < 0.05). The results of the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity analyses showed no significant differences with or without a barrier for any of the different colors of resin, polymerization time, or the three resins. Under the present experimental conditions, 70% ethanol significantly reduced the levels of microbial contamination, but it did not guarantee the inactivation of all microbial cells. The use of plastic protective barriers did not alter the flexural strength or the modulus of elasticity of any of the tested resin composites, indicating that they are a safe and viable measure to prevent cross-contamination when using a dental curing light.
在治疗前后以及使用和消毒后,对牙科固化灯头的污染情况进行了评估。还分析了塑料防护屏障对树脂复合材料弯曲强度和弹性模量的影响。在初始污染时(T0)进行微生物采样,单位为Log 10 CFU/4 mL;在牙科治疗后(T1);以及在用70%乙醇(v/v)消毒后(T2)。通过描述性统计和方差分析对结果进行分析。使用有无屏障的三种商用树脂复合材料的条形测试样本进行弯曲强度和弹性模量分析,并对测试进行统计正态性检验。在T0时,60.7%的试管培养基中观察到浑浊,T1时为100.0%,T2时为57.1%。T0和T2时的微生物污染情况相似,但T1时观察到显著增加。T1和T2之间回收的微生物载量有显著差异(p < 0.05)。弯曲强度和弹性模量分析结果表明,对于任何不同颜色的树脂、聚合时间或三种树脂,有无屏障均无显著差异。在当前实验条件下,70%乙醇显著降低了微生物污染水平,但不能保证所有微生物细胞均被灭活。使用塑料防护屏障不会改变任何测试树脂复合材料的弯曲强度或弹性模量,这表明在使用牙科固化灯时,它们是预防交叉污染的一种安全可行的措施。