• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环形交叉路口行人安全的系统评价。

Systematic review of pedestrian safety at roundabouts.

作者信息

Doğan Erdem

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, Kırıkkale University, 71450 Yahşihan, Kırıkkale, Turkiye.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2025 Sep;94:70-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2025.06.005. Epub 2025 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2025.06.005
PMID:40930665
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Roundabouts are increasingly being used to improve traffic flow and reduce conflict points compared to traditional intersections. While previous studies have generally shown that roundabouts reduce vehicle collisions and improve traffic conditions, their impact on pedestrian safety, particularly in urban areas with high pedestrian traffic, has not been adequately studied. Despite the potential of roundabouts to reduce the overall severity of collisions, recent studies also point to specific safety challenges for pedestrians, including the difficulties faced by slow-moving people, changes in pedestrian behavior when avoiding roundabouts, and problems with disabled pedestrians are faced with. This systematic review fills this gap by evaluating existing research on pedestrian safety at roundabouts and distinguishing it from other review studies. Additionally, this review focuses on examining roundabouts and their impacts on pedestrian safety, synthesizing the literature, and identifying key findings.

METHOD

Four research questions were developed, covering pedestrian behavior, personal traits, traffic volume and speed, geometric and design elements, and pedestrian safety assessment techniques. The research questions and the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) method were used to choose and thoroughly examine 51 studies. In addition, it is intended to support the correct selection of measures to improve pedestrian safety at roundabouts and provide researchers with a reference for safety modeling.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

Roundabouts with higher pedestrian safety standards can be planned with the help of this systematic review, which also helps to clarify the factors influencing pedestrian safety at roundabouts. When creating safe and sustainable transportation infrastructure, decision-makers and urban planners can use these findings as a guide.

摘要

引言

与传统十字路口相比,环形交叉路口越来越多地被用于改善交通流量和减少冲突点。虽然先前的研究普遍表明环形交叉路口可减少车辆碰撞并改善交通状况,但它们对行人安全的影响,尤其是在行人流量大的城市地区,尚未得到充分研究。尽管环形交叉路口有可能降低碰撞的总体严重程度,但最近的研究也指出了行人面临的具体安全挑战,包括行动缓慢者所面临的困难、行人在避开环形交叉路口时行为的变化,以及残疾行人所面临的问题。本系统综述通过评估现有关于环形交叉路口行人安全的研究并将其与其他综述研究区分开来,填补了这一空白。此外,本综述侧重于研究环形交叉路口及其对行人安全的影响,综合文献并确定关键发现。

方法

提出了四个研究问题,涵盖行人行为、个人特征、交通流量和速度、几何和设计元素以及行人安全评估技术。研究问题和PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)方法用于选择并全面审查51项研究。此外,旨在支持正确选择改善环形交叉路口行人安全的措施,并为安全建模的研究人员提供参考。

实际应用

借助本系统综述可以规划出具有更高行人安全标准的环形交叉路口,这也有助于阐明影响环形交叉路口行人安全的因素。在创建安全且可持续的交通基础设施时,决策者和城市规划者可以将这些发现用作指导。

相似文献

1
Systematic review of pedestrian safety at roundabouts.环形交叉路口行人安全的系统评价。
J Safety Res. 2025 Sep;94:70-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2025.06.005. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Cycling infrastructure for reducing cycling injuries in cyclists.用于减少骑车人骑行受伤的自行车基础设施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 10;2015(12):CD010415. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010415.pub2.
4
Impact of jaywalking on pedestrian interaction behavior: A multiagent Markov Game-based analysis.
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Sep;220:108141. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2025.108141. Epub 2025 Jun 14.
5
Promoting pedestrian safety in Bangladesh: Identifying factors for drivers' yielding behavior at designated crossings using behavior change theories.促进孟加拉国行人安全:使用行为改变理论确定驾驶员在指定交叉口让行行为的因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(7):976-985. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2355630. Epub 2024 May 20.
6
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
7
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
8
Safety education of pedestrians for injury prevention.行人安全教育以预防伤害。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(2):CD001531. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001531.
9
Objective and Perceived Traffic Safety for Children: A Systematic Literature Review of Traffic and Built Environment Characteristics Related to Safe Travel.儿童的目标和感知交通安全:与安全出行相关的交通和建成环境特征的系统文献回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 24;19(5):2641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052641.
10
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.