Li Yue-Juan, Li Xue, Li Mei-Juan, Gao Yu-Lin
School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Hemodialysis Center of Nansha, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 511457, Guangdong Province, China.
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Sep 19;15(9):107672. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.107672.
During the gradual decline of physical and social functioning associated with end-stage renal disease, patients might experience a premonition of impending death, resulting in a series of pre-mourning grief responses called preparatory grief. The preparatory grief in advanced cancer patients (PGAC) scale is the most widely used preparatory grief scale for patients on hemodialysis in China.
To verify the reliability and validity of the PGAC scale in patients on hemodialysis.
In total, 327 patients undergoing regular hemodialysis in the blood purification center of three grade-A tertiary hospitals in Guangdong and Guizhou provinces were selected by convenience sampling. The assessment was administered using the general information questionnaire and the Chinese version of PGAC. SPSS 25.0 and Amos 24.0 were used for item analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), convergent validity, and internal consistency reliability estimation.
In the modified Chinese version of PGAC, 7 dimensions covering 27 total items were retained. CFA revealed a good fit of the factor model (chi-square degree of freedom = 2.056, standardized root mean square residual = 0.0479, root mean square error of approximation = 0.0570 = 0.872, = 0.841, = 0.931, = 0.930, = 0.919). The factor loadings of the items ranged 0.503-0.884. The composite reliability ranged 0.664-0.914, and the average variance extracted ranged 0.366-0.747. Cronbach's α of the scale was 0.945, and Cronbach's α for various dimensions ranged 0.662-0.914.
The modified PGAC has good reliability and validity, and it can effectively measure preparatory grief in patients on hemodialysis.
在与终末期肾病相关的身体和社会功能逐渐衰退过程中,患者可能会经历濒死预感,从而产生一系列称为预备性悲伤的哀悼前悲伤反应。晚期癌症患者预备性悲伤(PGAC)量表是中国血液透析患者中使用最广泛的预备性悲伤量表。
验证PGAC量表在血液透析患者中的信效度。
采用方便抽样法,选取广东省和贵州省3家三级甲等医院血液净化中心的327例规律血液透析患者。使用一般信息问卷和中文版PGAC进行评估。采用SPSS 25.0和Amos 24.0进行项目分析、验证性因素分析(CFA)、收敛效度和内部一致性信度估计。
在修订后的中文版PGAC中,保留了涵盖27个项目的7个维度。CFA显示因素模型拟合良好(卡方自由度 = 2.056,标准化残差均方根 = 0.0479,近似误差均方根 = 0.0570,比较拟合指数 = 0.872,塔克-刘易斯指数 = 0.841,克伦巴赫α系数 = 0.931,组合信度 = 0.930,平均抽取方差 = 0.919)。项目的因素负荷范围为0.503 - 0.884。组合信度范围为0.664 - 0.914,平均抽取方差范围为0.366 - 0.747。该量表的克伦巴赫α系数为0.945,各维度的克伦巴赫α系数范围为0.662 - 0.914。
修订后的PGAC具有良好的信效度,能够有效测量血液透析患者的预备性悲伤。