Osawa Takumi, Nakayama Naoki, Ishizu Tomoko, Kondo Toru, Nakashima Takahiro, Yamamoto Takeshi, Hanada Hiroyuki, Hashiba Katsutaka, Kirigaya Jin, Hosoya Yumiko, Katasako-Yabumoto Aya, Okazaki Yusuke, Yamamoto Masahiro, Sakamoto Kazuo, Arai Marina, Tanaka Akihito, Matsuo Kunihiro, Yamaguchi Junichi, Mano Toshiaki, Kojima Sunao, Noguchi Teruo, Tsujimoto Yasushi, Kikuchi Migaku, Funazaki Toshikazu, Tahara Yoshio, Nonogi Hiroshi, Matoba Tetsuya
Department of Cardiology, University of Tsukuba Ibaraki Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kumamoto University Hospital Kumamoto Japan.
Circ Rep. 2025 Aug 6;7(9):735-741. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0108. eCollection 2025 Sep 10.
Cardiogenic shock, a life-threatening condition frequently encountered in emergency departments, requires rapid diagnosis and management. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used as a bedside tool; however, its impact on prognosis in patients with suspected cardiogenic shock remains unclear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate whether POCUS improves the clinical outcomes in these patients.
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to December 31, 2023, for studies evaluating the prognostic impact of POCUS in adults with undifferentiated shock, including cardiogenic shock. From 3,759 identified records, 2 studies (1 randomized controlled trial [RCT] and 1 observational study) involving 5,711 patients with shock were included. The RCT showed no significant differences in in-hospital mortality between the POCUS and non-POCUS groups (relative risk [RR] 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-1.51]). The observational study reported higher mortality in patients receiving POCUS before intervention (RR 1.25 [95% CI 1.12-1.39]). Overall, POCUS did not significantly reduce mortality in patients with suspected cardiogenic shock. Given the limited number and quality of available studies, the certainty of evidence was low (RCT) and very low (observational study).
Although POCUS plays an essential role in diagnosis and clinical decision-making, our review suggests that it may not significantly improve prognosis in patients with suspected cardiogenic shock. Further studies are required to determine its prognostic value.
心源性休克是急诊科常见的危及生命的病症,需要快速诊断和处理。床旁超声(POCUS)作为一种床旁工具被广泛使用;然而,其对疑似心源性休克患者预后的影响仍不明确。本系统评价旨在评估POCUS是否能改善这些患者的临床结局。
我们检索了截至2023年12月31日的PubMed、科学网和考克兰图书馆,以查找评估POCUS对未分化休克(包括心源性休克)成人患者预后影响的研究。从3759条检索到的记录中,纳入了2项研究(1项随机对照试验[RCT]和1项观察性研究),涉及5711例休克患者。RCT显示,POCUS组和非POCUS组的院内死亡率无显著差异(相对风险[RR]0.99[95%置信区间(CI)0.64 - 1.51])。观察性研究报告称,干预前接受POCUS检查的患者死亡率更高(RR 1.25[95%CI 1.12 - 1.39])。总体而言,POCUS并未显著降低疑似心源性休克患者的死亡率。鉴于现有研究数量有限且质量不高,证据的确定性较低(RCT)且非常低(观察性研究)。
尽管POCUS在诊断和临床决策中起着重要作用,但我们的数据显示,它可能不会显著改善疑似心源性休克患者的预后。需要进一步研究以确定其预后价值。