Fuke Yusuke
Ecological Genetics Laboratory, National Institute of Genetics, 1111 Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan. E-mail:
Zool Stud. 2024 Dec 25;63:e53. doi: 10.6620/ZS.2024.63-53.. eCollection 2024.
Shih et al. (2024) reported on the detection of species in Japan and their morphological characteristics in . Eleven taxa were identified based on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analysis and morphological examination. Among these, they identified two taxa that formed sister groups: and , which are primarily found in Japan and China. In this commentary, I argue that both species are actually . This conclusion was previously drawn by Onuki and Fuke (2022) based on their examination of genome-wide SNPs, mtDNA, and morphological data. The doubts raised about this identification represent a serious issue in terms of conservation, as is a native species, whereas is considered an invasive alien species in Japan. Two likely reasons for this misidentification are the oversight of previous studies and the inability to account for the effects of interspecific and intraspecific hybridization. Inaccurate or unsubstantiated identifications pose significant challenges to taxonomy and conservation, underscoring the need for research grounded in reliable methods and well-characterized specimens.
施等人(2024年)报告了在日本对物种的检测及其在[具体内容未给出]中的形态特征。基于线粒体DNA(mtDNA)分析和形态学检查,鉴定出了11个分类单元。其中,他们鉴定出两个形成姐妹群的分类单元:[具体名称未给出]和[具体名称未给出],主要分布在日本和中国。在这篇评论中,我认为这两个物种实际上都是[具体名称未给出]。这一结论此前由大贯和深科(2022年)基于对全基因组单核苷酸多态性、mtDNA和形态学数据的研究得出。对这一鉴定提出的疑问在保护方面构成了一个严重问题,因为[具体名称未给出]是本土物种,而[具体名称未给出]在日本被视为入侵外来物种。这种错误鉴定的两个可能原因是先前研究的疏忽以及无法考虑种间和种内杂交的影响。不准确或未经证实的鉴定给分类学和保护带来了重大挑战,凸显了基于可靠方法和特征明确的标本进行研究的必要性。