• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估NABH认证前后三级医院的质量改进:一项系统综述

Evaluating quality improvement in tertiary care hospital before and after NABH accreditation: a systematic review.

作者信息

Kanyal Deepika, Ghewade Babaji

机构信息

Department of Hospital Administration, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, India.

出版信息

Front Health Serv. 2025 Aug 26;5:1654514. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1654514. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/frhs.2025.1654514
PMID:40933719
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12417434/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers (NABH.) accreditation process aims to elevate the quality of healthcare services through an impartial, external peer evaluation of an organization's performance. This study compares NABH. quality indicators in a tertiary care hospital before and after accreditation, assessing changes in patient care, hospital management, and staff performance.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Literature was searched across PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library from August 2023 to January 2024. Keywords included "NABH. accreditation and hospital quality," "Accreditation in Indian hospitals and patient safety," and "Tertiary care hospital before and after accreditation." Boolean operators, synonyms, and related terms were used to ensure comprehensive retrieval. Independent reviewers screened studies, and risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

RESULTS

The study highlights significant improvements in hospital quality indicators following NABH accreditation. Hospital-acquired infection rates decreased, with infection control compliance improving by 40%. Operational efficiency improved with a 20% reduction in discharge delays and a 15% increase in documentation accuracy. Patient satisfaction scores rose by 25%, and structured policies enhanced service quality by 30%. Additionally, 85% of hospital staff reported higher job satisfaction. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences in compliance rates ( < 0.05) and patient care metrics ( < 0.01). Despite initial implementation challenges due to resource constraints, the study underscores the need for continuous monitoring and reinforcement of accreditation standards to sustain these improvements.

CONCLUSION

NABH accreditation improves patient safety, lowers infection rates, and boosts overall productivity. The structured framework encourages continuous improvement, but institutional commitment and ongoing oversight are necessary for long-term sustainability.

摘要

背景

医院和医疗服务提供者国家认证委员会(NABH)的认证过程旨在通过对组织绩效进行公正的外部同行评估来提高医疗服务质量。本研究比较了一家三级护理医院在获得NABH认证前后的质量指标,评估了患者护理、医院管理和员工绩效的变化。

方法

按照PRISMA指南进行系统综述。于2023年8月至2024年1月在PubMed、Scopus、谷歌学术和Cochrane图书馆中检索文献。关键词包括“NABH认证与医院质量”、“印度医院的认证与患者安全”以及“认证前后的三级护理医院”。使用布尔运算符、同义词和相关术语以确保全面检索。独立评审员筛选研究,并使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行偏倚风险评估。

结果

该研究突出了NABH认证后医院质量指标的显著改善。医院获得性感染率下降,感染控制合规率提高了40%。运营效率得到改善,出院延迟减少了20%,文件记录准确性提高了15%。患者满意度得分提高了25%,结构化政策使服务质量提高了30%。此外,85%的医院员工报告工作满意度更高。统计分析证实了合规率(<0.05)和患者护理指标(<0.01)存在显著差异。尽管由于资源限制在初始实施阶段存在挑战,但该研究强调需要持续监测和强化认证标准以维持这些改善。

结论

NABH认证提高了患者安全性,降低了感染率,并提高了整体生产力。结构化框架鼓励持续改进,但机构承诺和持续监督对于长期可持续性是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6217/12417434/ff5b55ae0475/frhs-05-1654514-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6217/12417434/ff5b55ae0475/frhs-05-1654514-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6217/12417434/ff5b55ae0475/frhs-05-1654514-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating quality improvement in tertiary care hospital before and after NABH accreditation: a systematic review.评估NABH认证前后三级医院的质量改进:一项系统综述
Front Health Serv. 2025 Aug 26;5:1654514. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1654514. eCollection 2025.
2
External inspection of compliance with standards for improved healthcare outcomes.对改善医疗结果标准的合规情况进行外部检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 2;12(12):CD008992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008992.pub3.
3
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
4
Effectiveness of external inspection of compliance with standards in improving healthcare organisation behaviour, healthcare professional behaviour or patient outcomes.外部合规检查在改善医疗机构行为、医疗专业人员行为或患者结局方面的有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9(11):CD008992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008992.pub2.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Do Magnet®-accredited hospitals show improvements in nurse and patient outcomes compared to non-Magnet hospitals: a systematic review.与非磁石医院相比,获得磁石认证的医院在护士和患者结局方面是否有所改善:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jul 17;13(6):168-219. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2262.
8
A Retrospective Analysis of Utilization Patterns and the National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers (NABH)-Mandated Blood Bank Quality Indicators at a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India.印度南部一家三级护理医院的用血模式及国家医院和医疗服务提供者认证委员会(NABH)规定的血库质量指标的回顾性分析。
Cureus. 2025 May 27;17(5):e84876. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84876. eCollection 2025 May.
9
Reducing unplanned hospital admissions from care homes: a systematic review.减少养老院的非计划性住院:系统评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(18):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KLPW6338.
10
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间远程家庭监护模式的快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(13):1-151. doi: 10.3310/FVQW4410.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing a quality improvement initiative for private healthcare facilities to achieve accreditation: experience from India.为私立医疗机构实施质量改进计划以实现认证:来自印度的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 27;23(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09619-w.
2
Perception of Hospital Accreditation Impact among Quality Management Professionals in India: A Survey-Based Multicenter Study.印度质量管理专业人员对医院认证影响的认知:一项基于调查的多中心研究
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2021 May 18;4(2):58-64. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-20-44. eCollection 2021 May.
3
The impact of hospital accreditation on the quality of healthcare: a systematic literature review.
医院认证对医疗质量的影响:系统文献回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 6;21(1):1057. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07097-6.
4
Impact assessment of accreditation in primary and secondary public health-care institutions in Kerala, India.印度喀拉拉邦初级和二级公立医疗机构认证的影响评估。
Indian J Public Health. 2021 Apr-Jun;65(2):110-115. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_827_20.
5
Impact of accreditation on documentation and staff perception in the ophthalmology department of an Indian medical college.认证对印度医学院眼科部门文档记录和员工认知的影响。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;69(2):337-342. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_848_20.
6
Impact of accreditation on the quality of healthcare services: a systematic review of the literature.认证对医疗服务质量的影响:文献系统评价
Ann Saudi Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):407-16. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.83204.
7
Does accreditation stimulate change? A study of the impact of the accreditation process on Canadian healthcare organizations.认证是否能激发变革?认证过程对加拿大医疗机构影响的研究
Implement Sci. 2010 Apr 26;5:31. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-31.