Abdelaziz Mohamed Abdelwanis Mohamed, Mohamed Ahmed, Prabhulingam Siddesh, Yaseen Ambreen, Sabrah Khaled, Hussin Fatini, Aldulaimi Riyam, Elsheikh Hazem, Loona Ashu, Soomro Irshad, Gajjar Ketankumar, Wormald Benjamin
Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Campus, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, United Lincolnshire Hospitals, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln LN2 5QY, UK.
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2025 Sep 2;2025:7202848. doi: 10.1155/ogi/7202848. eCollection 2025.
Management of advanced endometrial cancer (EC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge, with ongoing debate regarding optimal treatment sequencing. Primary cytoreductive surgeries (PCSs) with adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are both employed as treatment strategies. This study analyses outcomes of both treatment strategies in Nottingham University Hospitals Cancer Centre. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced EC (FIGO Stages III-IV) treated at our centre between 2013 and 2023. Patients who received either PCS with adjuvant therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are included in the study. Data collection included demographic characteristics, treatment approaches, surgical parameters, and outcome measures. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included perioperative outcomes and recurrence patterns. Treatment pathways included NACT-IDS ( = 8) and PCS with adjuvant therapy ( = 57). Stage IV disease was notably more prevalent in patients who received NACT-IDS therapy compared to the PCS group (75.0% versus 5.3%, < 0.001). Analysis revealed a PFS duration of 18.5 months for NACT-IDS patients, whilst PCS patients demonstrated a longer duration of 35.5 months (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.56-2.48, =0.328). Median OS was 22.0 months in the NACT-IDS group versus 41.0 months in the PCS group (HR 1.35, 95% CI: 0.64-2.83, =0.145). Mean operative time was longer in the NACT-IDS group (239.7 vs 165.5 min, =0.209). All NACT-IDS procedures were performed via open laparotomy compared to 49.1% in the PCS group ( < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the NACT-IDS group (median 8 vs 3 days, =0.036). Radiotherapy was administered to 25.0% ( = 2) of NACT-IDS patients and 59.6% ( = 34) of PCS patients. Recurrence rates were higher in the NACT-IDS group, 37.5%, compared to 33.3% in the PCS patients (=0.823). This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into treatment outcomes and surgical parameters for advanced EC. Whilst the small sample size of the NACT-IDS cohort limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions, the study provides meaningful evidence that can inform clinical decision-making. The findings lay important groundwork for future prospective, multicentre studies aimed at optimising patient selection and treatment sequencing in this challenging disease.
晚期子宫内膜癌(EC)的治疗是一项重大的治疗挑战,关于最佳治疗顺序的争论仍在继续。采用辅助治疗的原发性细胞减灭术(PCSs)以及新辅助化疗后行间隔减瘤手术(NACT-IDS)均被用作治疗策略。本研究分析了诺丁汉大学医院癌症中心这两种治疗策略的治疗效果。我们对2013年至2023年在本中心接受治疗的晚期EC(国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)III-IV期)患者进行了回顾性队列分析。研究纳入了接受PCS联合辅助治疗或新辅助化疗后行间隔减瘤手术(NACT-IDS)的患者。数据收集包括人口统计学特征、治疗方法、手术参数和结局指标。主要结局为无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。次要结局包括围手术期结局和复发模式。治疗途径包括NACT-IDS(n = 8)和PCS联合辅助治疗(n = 57)。与PCS组相比,接受NACT-IDS治疗的患者中IV期疾病更为普遍(75.0% 对5.3%,P < 0.001)。分析显示,NACT-IDS患者的PFS持续时间为18.5个月,而PCS患者的持续时间更长,为35.5个月(风险比[HR] 1.18,95%置信区间[CI]:0.56 - 2.48,P = 0.328)。NACT-IDS组的中位OS为22.0个月,而PCS组为41.0个月(HR 1.35,95% CI:0.64 - 2.83,P = 0.145)。NACT-IDS组的平均手术时间更长(239.7对165.5分钟,P = 0.209)。所有NACT-IDS手术均通过开放剖腹术进行,而PCS组为49.1%(P < 0.001)。NACT-IDS组的住院时间明显更长(中位8天对3天,P = 0.036)。25.0%(n = 2)的NACT-IDS患者和59.6%(n = 34)的PCS患者接受了放疗。NACT-IDS组的复发率更高,为37.5%,而PCS患者为33.3%(P = 0.823)。 这项综合分析为晚期EC的治疗效果和手术参数提供了有价值的见解。虽然NACT-IDS队列的样本量较小,限制了得出明确结论的能力,但该研究提供了有意义的证据,可为临床决策提供参考。这些发现为未来旨在优化这种具有挑战性疾病的患者选择和治疗顺序的前瞻性多中心研究奠定了重要基础。