• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估晚期子宫内膜癌的治疗策略:原发性细胞减灭术与新辅助化疗后行中间性肿瘤细胞减灭术——一项为期十年的单中心经验

Evaluating Treatment Strategies in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Primary Cytoreductive Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery-A Ten-Year Single-Centre Experience.

作者信息

Abdelaziz Mohamed Abdelwanis Mohamed, Mohamed Ahmed, Prabhulingam Siddesh, Yaseen Ambreen, Sabrah Khaled, Hussin Fatini, Aldulaimi Riyam, Elsheikh Hazem, Loona Ashu, Soomro Irshad, Gajjar Ketankumar, Wormald Benjamin

机构信息

Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Campus, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, United Lincolnshire Hospitals, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln LN2 5QY, UK.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Int. 2025 Sep 2;2025:7202848. doi: 10.1155/ogi/7202848. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1155/ogi/7202848
PMID:40933797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12419923/
Abstract

Management of advanced endometrial cancer (EC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge, with ongoing debate regarding optimal treatment sequencing. Primary cytoreductive surgeries (PCSs) with adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are both employed as treatment strategies. This study analyses outcomes of both treatment strategies in Nottingham University Hospitals Cancer Centre. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced EC (FIGO Stages III-IV) treated at our centre between 2013 and 2023. Patients who received either PCS with adjuvant therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are included in the study. Data collection included demographic characteristics, treatment approaches, surgical parameters, and outcome measures. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included perioperative outcomes and recurrence patterns. Treatment pathways included NACT-IDS ( = 8) and PCS with adjuvant therapy ( = 57). Stage IV disease was notably more prevalent in patients who received NACT-IDS therapy compared to the PCS group (75.0% versus 5.3%, < 0.001). Analysis revealed a PFS duration of 18.5 months for NACT-IDS patients, whilst PCS patients demonstrated a longer duration of 35.5 months (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.56-2.48, =0.328). Median OS was 22.0 months in the NACT-IDS group versus 41.0 months in the PCS group (HR 1.35, 95% CI: 0.64-2.83, =0.145). Mean operative time was longer in the NACT-IDS group (239.7 vs 165.5 min, =0.209). All NACT-IDS procedures were performed via open laparotomy compared to 49.1% in the PCS group ( < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the NACT-IDS group (median 8 vs 3 days, =0.036). Radiotherapy was administered to 25.0% ( = 2) of NACT-IDS patients and 59.6% ( = 34) of PCS patients. Recurrence rates were higher in the NACT-IDS group, 37.5%, compared to 33.3% in the PCS patients (=0.823). This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into treatment outcomes and surgical parameters for advanced EC. Whilst the small sample size of the NACT-IDS cohort limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions, the study provides meaningful evidence that can inform clinical decision-making. The findings lay important groundwork for future prospective, multicentre studies aimed at optimising patient selection and treatment sequencing in this challenging disease.

摘要

晚期子宫内膜癌(EC)的治疗是一项重大的治疗挑战,关于最佳治疗顺序的争论仍在继续。采用辅助治疗的原发性细胞减灭术(PCSs)以及新辅助化疗后行间隔减瘤手术(NACT-IDS)均被用作治疗策略。本研究分析了诺丁汉大学医院癌症中心这两种治疗策略的治疗效果。我们对2013年至2023年在本中心接受治疗的晚期EC(国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)III-IV期)患者进行了回顾性队列分析。研究纳入了接受PCS联合辅助治疗或新辅助化疗后行间隔减瘤手术(NACT-IDS)的患者。数据收集包括人口统计学特征、治疗方法、手术参数和结局指标。主要结局为无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。次要结局包括围手术期结局和复发模式。治疗途径包括NACT-IDS(n = 8)和PCS联合辅助治疗(n = 57)。与PCS组相比,接受NACT-IDS治疗的患者中IV期疾病更为普遍(75.0% 对5.3%,P < 0.001)。分析显示,NACT-IDS患者的PFS持续时间为18.5个月,而PCS患者的持续时间更长,为35.5个月(风险比[HR] 1.18,95%置信区间[CI]:0.56 - 2.48,P = 0.328)。NACT-IDS组的中位OS为22.0个月,而PCS组为41.0个月(HR 1.35,95% CI:0.64 - 2.83,P = 0.145)。NACT-IDS组的平均手术时间更长(239.7对165.5分钟,P = 0.209)。所有NACT-IDS手术均通过开放剖腹术进行,而PCS组为49.1%(P < 0.001)。NACT-IDS组的住院时间明显更长(中位8天对3天,P = 0.036)。25.0%(n = 2)的NACT-IDS患者和59.6%(n = 34)的PCS患者接受了放疗。NACT-IDS组的复发率更高,为37.5%,而PCS患者为33.3%(P = 0.823)。 这项综合分析为晚期EC的治疗效果和手术参数提供了有价值的见解。虽然NACT-IDS队列的样本量较小,限制了得出明确结论的能力,但该研究提供了有意义的证据,可为临床决策提供参考。这些发现为未来旨在优化这种具有挑战性疾病的患者选择和治疗顺序的前瞻性多中心研究奠定了重要基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8432/12419923/c6e429c25633/OGI2025-7202848.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8432/12419923/bfcbe270ab93/OGI2025-7202848.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8432/12419923/31c058772c42/OGI2025-7202848.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8432/12419923/8ac68e1cd892/OGI2025-7202848.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8432/12419923/c6e429c25633/OGI2025-7202848.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8432/12419923/bfcbe270ab93/OGI2025-7202848.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8432/12419923/31c058772c42/OGI2025-7202848.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8432/12419923/8ac68e1cd892/OGI2025-7202848.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8432/12419923/c6e429c25633/OGI2025-7202848.004.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating Treatment Strategies in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Primary Cytoreductive Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery-A Ten-Year Single-Centre Experience.评估晚期子宫内膜癌的治疗策略:原发性细胞减灭术与新辅助化疗后行中间性肿瘤细胞减灭术——一项为期十年的单中心经验
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2025 Sep 2;2025:7202848. doi: 10.1155/ogi/7202848. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
3
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.晚期上皮性卵巢癌初始治疗中,术前新辅助化疗与手术加化疗的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 10;2(2):CD005343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub7.
4
Selective Advantage of NACT in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Centre Analysis.新辅助化疗在晚期卵巢癌中的选择性优势:一项回顾性单中心分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Aug 20;61(8):1493. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081493.
5
Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.晚期卵巢上皮癌初始治疗中化疗与手术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD005343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub3.
6
Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer.根治性子宫切除术联合放化疗与单纯根治性子宫切除术治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的疗效比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 22;8(8):CD010260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010260.pub3.
7
Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer.对局部晚期宫颈癌女性患者进行子宫切除术并辅以放疗或化疗或两者联合治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 7(4):CD010260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010260.pub2.
8
Adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer.晚期子宫内膜癌的辅助化疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 15;2014(5):CD010681. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010681.pub2.
9
Ultra-radical (extensive) surgery versus standard surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.超根治性(广泛)手术与标准手术治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌的初步细胞减灭术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 30;8(8):CD007697. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007697.pub3.
10
Cytoreductive surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a real-world analysis guided by clinical variables, homologous recombination, and BRCA status.晚期上皮性卵巢癌的细胞减灭术:一项由临床变量、同源重组和BRCA状态指导的真实世界分析
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2025 Jun;35(6):101809. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101809. Epub 2025 Apr 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2024.2024年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
2
Optimal Management for Stage IVB Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review.IVB期子宫内膜癌的最佳管理:一项系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 24;15(21):5123. doi: 10.3390/cancers15215123.
3
Management of Patients Diagnosed with Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Guidelines.子宫内膜癌确诊患者的管理:指南比较
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 8;15(4):1091. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041091.
4
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial cancer: A systematic review.晚期子宫内膜癌的新辅助化疗:一项系统评价。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2021 Nov 6;38:100887. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100887. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for advanced-stage endometrial cancer.新辅助化疗后手术治疗晚期子宫内膜癌。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Apr;26(2):e226-e232. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4655. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
6
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for unresectable stage IVB Serous endometrial cancer.新辅助化疗后行间隔减瘤手术治疗无法切除的IVB期浆液性子宫内膜癌。
Tumori. 2019 Feb;105(1):92-97. doi: 10.1177/0300891618784785. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
7
Influence of Lymphadenectomy on Survival for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer.淋巴结清扫术对早期子宫内膜癌生存率的影响
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;127(1):109-118. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001194.
8
Endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌。
Lancet. 2016 Mar 12;387(10023):1094-1108. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00130-0. Epub 2015 Sep 6.
9
Contemporary management of endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌的当代治疗方法。
Lancet. 2012 Apr 7;379(9823):1352-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60442-5. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
10
Influence of gynecologic oncologists on the survival of patients with endometrial cancer.妇科肿瘤学家对子宫内膜癌患者生存的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 1;29(7):832-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.2124. Epub 2011 Jan 24.