Krumsvik Rune Johan, Slettvoll Vegard
Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Front Digit Health. 2025 Aug 26;7:1655154. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1655154. eCollection 2025.
Through a series of case studies, we have pretested the capabilities and reliability of the Large Language Models (LLM), Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4) and OpenAI o3 reasoning model (o3) in educational and healthcare contexts. Based on this knowledge, we took a step further by testing these technologies in an authentic patient case set in a fictitious location. The context for this brief case report relates to the fact that, in the first quarter of 2025, fewer patients lacked an assigned GP compared to previous years-a positive trend. However, this offers little relief to those cut off from GP care due to their rural location or because of landslides and extreme weather. This case highlights the need for knowledge-based preparedness and alternative health empowerment pathways in rural Norway. This brief case report describes a single 16-year-old boy ( = 1) with no significant past medical history or chronic conditions. Although he lived in an urban area, we reframed the encounter as a simulated rural, avalanche-isolated scenario to test the feasibility of AI-supported care under extreme access constraints. Specifically, the case models how a patient in an avalanche-prone mountain valley-where seasonal road closures routinely sever access to healthcare facilities-could receive rapid, guideline-concordant treatment for severe tonsillitis during a period of general-practitioner (GP) unavailability. Repeated attempts to secure a same-day appointment were thwarted by workforce shortages and impassable roads, resulting in the earliest available appointment being five days away. The family leveraged point-of-care technologies (fingerstick C-reactive protein analysis, wearable sensors, blood pressure device, digital fever device, mobile ECG) and an o3 language model[1] to evaluate disease severity. A peak CRP of 130 mg/L, combined with otherwise stable vital signs, prompted a remote consultation with a trusted physician in their social network, who confirmed the diagnosis of bacterial tonsillitis and initiated treatment with phenoxymethylpenicillin (Apocillin). Within 72 h, CRP fell to 23 mg/L and symptoms were resolved. The patient case and the events described in this pilot study are authentic, but the location is fictitious. The waiting time to see a general practitioner was five days in both the actual urban setting and the simulated rural scenario; however, unlike in urban contexts-where patients can often access immediate care through emergency clinics or private GPs-such options are typically unavailable in sparsely populated rural areas. This case illustrates how AI and health technology can serve as a "virtual waiting room" for individuals in rural or landslide- and avalanche-isolated areas, especially when GP access is limited and the condition is low-risk, such as mild sore throat symptoms. The case illustrates how inexpensive diagnostics and AI-supported reasoning can strengthen health empowerment and temporarily bridge care gaps for residents of geographically isolated Norwegian communities-provided that human clinical oversight and robust digital health governance remain in place. Therefore, all LLM recommendations and technology support were reviewed during an in-person physician examination in a family network, and the final antibiotic prescription came from the clinician, underscoring that AI functioned solely as decision support rather than autonomous care.
通过一系列案例研究,我们预先测试了大语言模型(LLM)、生成式预训练变换器4(GPT-4)和OpenAI的o3推理模型(o3)在教育和医疗保健环境中的能力和可靠性。基于这些认知,我们更进一步,在一个虚构地点的真实患者病例集中测试了这些技术。本简短病例报告的背景是,与前几年相比,2025年第一季度缺少指定全科医生的患者数量有所减少,这是一个积极趋势。然而,对于那些因地处农村或因山体滑坡和极端天气而无法获得全科医生护理的人来说,这并没有带来多少缓解。本病例凸显了挪威农村地区基于知识的准备工作和替代性健康赋权途径的必要性。本简短病例报告描述了一名16岁男孩(n = 1),他没有重大既往病史或慢性病。尽管他住在城市地区,但我们将此次就诊重新设定为模拟的农村、雪崩隔离场景,以测试在极端就医限制条件下人工智能支持护理的可行性。具体而言,该病例模拟了一名身处雪崩易发山谷的患者——季节性道路封闭经常切断前往医疗设施的通道——在全科医生无法提供服务期间如何能够接受针对严重扁桃体炎的快速、符合指南的治疗。由于劳动力短缺和道路无法通行,多次尝试预约当日就诊均受阻,最早可预约的时间为五天后。患者家属利用即时护理技术(指尖C反应蛋白分析、可穿戴传感器、血压计、数字体温计、移动心电图)和o3语言模型[1]来评估疾病严重程度。C反应蛋白峰值为130mg/L,结合其他生命体征稳定的情况,促使他们与社交网络中一位值得信赖的医生进行远程会诊,该医生确诊为细菌性扁桃体炎,并开始使用苯氧甲基青霉素(青霉素V钾片)治疗。72小时内,C反应蛋白降至23mg/L,症状得到缓解。本试点研究中描述的患者病例和事件是真实的,但地点是虚构的。在实际城市环境和模拟农村场景中,看全科医生的等待时间均为五天;然而,与城市环境不同——城市患者通常可以通过急诊诊所或私人全科医生获得即时护理——在人口稀少的农村地区,此类选择通常不可用。本病例说明了人工智能和健康技术如何能够为农村或因山体滑坡和雪崩而与世隔绝地区的个人充当“虚拟候诊室”,特别是当获得全科医生服务的机会有限且病情为低风险时,如轻度喉咙痛症状。该病例说明了廉价诊断和人工智能支持的推理如何能够增强健康赋权,并暂时弥合挪威地理上孤立社区居民的护理差距——前提是有人工临床监督和健全的数字健康治理。因此,在家庭网络中的面对面医生检查期间,对所有大语言模型的建议和技术支持进行了审查,最终的抗生素处方来自临床医生,这突出表明人工智能仅作为决策支持而非自主护理发挥作用。