Donough Gabieba, Mthimunye Katlego, Daniels Felicity
Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Health SA. 2025 Aug 21;30:3061. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v30i0.3061. eCollection 2025.
Quality theoretical assessments in nursing education are essential for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 4 (ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education and promoting lifelong learning opportunities for all). However, misalignment with National Qualification Framework (NQF) standards, an overreliance on recall-based questions and inadequate educator training undermine the fairness of assessments and students' ability to demonstrate clinical competence.
This study explores theoretical assessment design in nursing education, evaluating its alignment with NQF standards, competency-based assessments and Sustainable Development Goal 4.
Conducted at a South African nursing school offering undergraduate nursing programmes.
A multimethod approach integrated educator interviews, document reviews of moderation reports, a scoping review and a student survey to investigate assessment practices.
While educators valued Bloom's Taxonomy, over-reliance on recall-based questions limited critical thinking, clinical decision-making and competency development. Misalignment with NQF standards caused inconsistencies in cognitive demand, while gaps in moderation processes impacted assessment validity and fairness. Educators faced challenges because of limited training and support, and students struggled with ambiguous and linguistically complex assessments that hindered their ability to demonstrate competency.
Strengthening assessment design, moderation and educator training is essential to improving competency-based assessment practices in nursing education. Policy reforms promoting fair, transparent, and competency-driven assessments will enhance graduate preparedness, ensure alignment with NQF standards and support SDG 4's goal of quality education.
This study provides empirical evidence supporting assessment policy improvements, promoting structured, competency-based assessments that enhance fairness, deepen learning and align with nursing education standards.
护理教育中的质量理论评估对于实现可持续发展目标4(确保包容和公平的优质教育,促进所有人的终身学习机会)至关重要。然而,与国家资格框架(NQF)标准不一致、过度依赖基于回忆的问题以及教育工作者培训不足,破坏了评估的公平性以及学生展示临床能力的能力。
本研究探讨护理教育中的理论评估设计,评估其与NQF标准、基于能力的评估以及可持续发展目标4的一致性。
在一所提供本科护理课程的南非护理学校进行。
采用多方法途径,综合教育工作者访谈、对审核报告的文件审查、范围审查和学生调查,以调查评估实践。
虽然教育工作者重视布鲁姆分类法,但对基于回忆问题的过度依赖限制了批判性思维、临床决策和能力发展。与NQF标准不一致导致认知要求不一致,而审核过程中的差距影响了评估的有效性和公平性。由于培训和支持有限,教育工作者面临挑战,学生则在模糊且语言复杂的评估中挣扎,这阻碍了他们展示能力的能力。
加强评估设计、审核和教育工作者培训对于改善护理教育中基于能力的评估实践至关重要。促进公平、透明和以能力为导向的评估的政策改革将提高毕业生的准备程度,确保与NQF标准一致,并支持可持续发展目标4的优质教育目标。
本研究提供了支持评估政策改进的实证证据,促进结构化、基于能力的评估,以提高公平性、深化学习并与护理教育标准保持一致。