Abou Hashish Ebtsam Aly, Alnajjar Hend, Rawas Hawazen
College of Nursing - Jeddah, King Saud Bin Abdul-Aziz University for Health Sciences, P.O.Box.9515, Jeddah, 21423, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 14;25(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06657-2.
Academic accreditation is a pivotal process in nursing education, ensuring program quality, consistency, and graduate readiness for professional practice. Despite its significance, limited research explores the lived experiences and perspectives of stakeholders, including academic nurse educators, administrators, students, and alumni-engaged in accreditation.
This study aimed to explore the lived experiences, perceptions, and insights of nursing education stakeholders regarding the accreditation process, focusing on its impact on educational quality, program reputation, and professional preparation.
A qualitative phenomenological approach was employed, using purposive sampling to recruit 54 participants from a Saudi nursing college, including academic nurse educators and administrators (n = 24), students (n = 20), and alumni (n = 10). Data were collected through semi-structured interviews.Thematic analysis identified key themes and subthemes associated with participants' experiences of accreditation.
Six main themes emerged: (1) knowledge and experience of accreditation; (2) importance and benefits of accreditation; (3) impact of accreditation; (4) preparation for professional practice; (5) challenges of accreditation; and (6) suggestions for improvement. Stakeholders across all groups recognized accreditation as essential for program quality and career readiness. Faculty and alumni emphasized the role of accreditation in enhancing program reputation and credibility, while students highlighted its influence on their learning experiences, though they expressed a desire for more engagement and transparency in the process. Faculty and administrators reported significant challenges, including administrative demands, time management, and resource allocation in maintaining accreditation standards.
This study offers a comprehensive view of accreditation's multi-dimensional impact from multiple stakeholder perspectives and experiences, reinforcing accreditation's importance in promoting nursing education quality and alignment with healthcare standards. However, findings suggest a need for institutional support to manage accreditation demands effectively. Future research should investigate accreditation's long-term impact through longitudinal and multi-site studies to broaden understanding and enhance the generalizability of findings in nursing education contexts worldwide.
学术认证是护理教育中的一个关键过程,可确保课程质量、一致性以及毕业生为专业实践做好准备。尽管其意义重大,但探索包括学术护理教育工作者、管理人员、学生和参与认证的校友等利益相关者的生活经历和观点的研究有限。
本研究旨在探讨护理教育利益相关者对认证过程的生活经历、看法和见解,重点关注其对教育质量、课程声誉和专业准备的影响。
采用定性现象学方法,通过目的抽样从一所沙特护理学院招募了54名参与者,包括学术护理教育工作者和管理人员(n = 24)、学生(n = 20)和校友(n = 10)。通过半结构化访谈收集数据。主题分析确定了与参与者认证经历相关的关键主题和子主题。
出现了六个主要主题:(1)认证的知识和经验;(2)认证的重要性和益处;(3)认证的影响;(4)专业实践准备;(5)认证的挑战;(6)改进建议。所有群体的利益相关者都认为认证对课程质量和职业准备至关重要。教师和校友强调认证在提升课程声誉和可信度方面的作用,而学生则强调其对学习经历的影响,不过他们表示希望在过程中有更多参与和透明度。教师和管理人员报告了重大挑战,包括行政要求、时间管理以及维持认证标准方面的资源分配。
本研究从多个利益相关者的角度和经验全面审视了认证的多维度影响,强化了认证在促进护理教育质量以及与医疗保健标准保持一致方面的重要性。然而,研究结果表明需要机构支持以有效管理认证要求。未来的研究应通过纵向和多地点研究调查认证的长期影响,以拓宽理解并增强研究结果在全球护理教育背景下的普遍性。