Suppr超能文献

肌动蛋白调节蛋白亚型作为尿路上皮膀胱癌的生物标志物:前景与挑战

Tropomyosin Isoforms as Biomarkers for Urothelial Bladder Cancer: Promise and Challenges.

作者信息

Akintelure Daniel, Tawose Pelumi, Akintelure Simon, Agada Regina

机构信息

Urology, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, GBR.

Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Aug 11;17(8):e89801. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89801. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Tropomyosin (TPM) isoforms have been proposed as potential non-invasive biomarkers for urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) owing to their altered expression in tumors and detectability in urine. Some transcriptomic studies have reported a high diagnostic accuracy of approximately 0.85 area under the curve (AUC) for TPM1-3 as a standard in distinguishing UBC from normal tissue. However, critical evaluation has revealed several limitations, including insufficient clinical validation, isoform complexity, non-specific expression across cancer types, lack of mechanistic insights, and challenges in urinary detection. Current evidence regarding TPM relies largely on retrospective bioinformatics analyses of tumor RNA, such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), rather than validated clinical assays, raising concerns about generalizability. The TPM family is highly complex (four genes, >40 splice isoforms) with tissue-specific expression, and similar dysregulation occurs in other cancers, undermining its specificity for UBC. Crucially, no established assays exist for isoform-specific TPMs in urine, and urinary proteins can degrade if the samples are not handled properly. Therefore, although the findings are promising in concept, TPM isoforms lack rigorous clinical validation and technical feasibility to serve as standalone UBC biomarkers. This review systematically examines these concerns, highlighting the need for comprehensive research before TPM isoforms can be reliably employed as clinical biomarkers for UBC.

摘要

由于原肌球蛋白(TPM)异构体在肿瘤中的表达改变以及在尿液中的可检测性,它们已被提议作为尿路上皮膀胱癌(UBC)潜在的非侵入性生物标志物。一些转录组学研究报告称,以TPM1-3作为区分UBC与正常组织的标准,其诊断准确性较高,曲线下面积(AUC)约为0.85。然而,严格评估发现了几个局限性,包括临床验证不足、异构体复杂性、跨癌症类型的非特异性表达、缺乏机制性见解以及尿液检测方面的挑战。目前关于TPM的证据很大程度上依赖于对肿瘤RNA的回顾性生物信息学分析,如癌症基因组图谱(TCGA),而不是经过验证的临床检测,这引发了对其普遍性的担忧。TPM家族高度复杂(四个基因,>40种剪接异构体),具有组织特异性表达,并且在其他癌症中也会出现类似的失调,这削弱了其对UBC的特异性。至关重要的是,目前尚无针对尿液中异构体特异性TPM的既定检测方法,并且如果样本处理不当,尿液中的蛋白质会降解。因此,尽管这些发现从概念上讲很有前景,但TPM异构体缺乏严格的临床验证和技术可行性,无法作为独立的UBC生物标志物。本综述系统地审视了这些问题,强调在TPM异构体能够可靠地用作UBC的临床生物标志物之前,需要进行全面的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/350d/12422070/18ed4163c212/cureus-0017-00000089801-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验