Morawska-Wilk Alicja, Kensy Julia, Kiryk Sylwia, Kotela Agnieszka, Kiryk Jan, Michalak Mateusz, Grychowska Natalia, Fast Magdalena, Matys Jacek, Dobrzyński Maciej
Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Preclinical Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland.
Faculty of Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland.
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2025 Apr 25;15(9):651. doi: 10.3390/nano15090651.
This systematic review aims to evaluate factors influencing fluoride release from dental nanocomposite materials. A comprehensive database search was conducted in February 2025 using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The search terms "fluoride release AND nanocomposites" were applied following PRISMA guidelines. Out of 336 initially identified articles, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. Seventeen studies confirmed that fluoride-releasing nanocomposites are effective, with fluoride ion release influenced by material composition, nanofiller type, and storage conditions. Studies showed that acidic environments (pH 4-5.5) significantly enhanced fluoride release, particularly in materials containing nano-CaF or fluoridated hydroxyapatite, which responded to pH changes. Quantitative comparisons revealed that daily fluoride release values ranged from <0.1 μg/cm/day in commercial composites to greater than 6500 μg/cm/day in BT-based nanocomposites and up to 416,667 μg/cm/day in modified GICs. Additionally, some composites exhibited fluoride recharging capabilities, with materials incorporating pyromellitic glycerol dimethacrylate (PMGDM) and ethoxylated bisphenol A dimethacrylate (EBPADMA) demonstrating prolonged fluoride and calcium ion release after recharge exposure, rather than the highest initial values. Despite releasing lower fluoride levels than conventional GIC and RMGI materials, fluoride-releasing nanocomposites demonstrate significant anti-caries potential and clinical applicability, with some formulations supporting periodontal regeneration and caries prevention around orthodontic brackets. However, the lack of consistency in study protocols-including differences in storage media, sample geometry, and measurement methods-limits direct comparison of outcomes. Therefore, the most critical direction for future research is the development of standardized testing protocols to ensure reliable, comparable results across material groups.
本系统评价旨在评估影响牙科纳米复合材料氟释放的因素。2025年2月,使用PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus进行了全面的数据库检索。按照PRISMA指南应用检索词“氟释放与纳米复合材料”。在最初识别的336篇文章中,17项研究符合纳入标准并被选入分析。17项研究证实,含氟纳米复合材料是有效的,氟离子释放受材料组成、纳米填料类型和储存条件影响。研究表明,酸性环境(pH 4 - 5.5)显著增强氟释放,特别是在含有纳米CaF或氟化羟基磷灰石的材料中,这些材料对pH变化有反应。定量比较显示,每日氟释放值范围从商业复合材料中的<0.1μg/cm²/天到基于BT的纳米复合材料中的大于6500μg/cm²/天,以及改性玻璃离子水门汀中的高达416,667μg/cm²/天。此外,一些复合材料表现出氟再充注能力,含有均苯四甲酸甘油二甲基丙烯酸酯(PMGDM)和乙氧基化双酚A二甲基丙烯酸酯(EBPADMA)的材料在再充注暴露后显示出延长的氟和钙离子释放,而不是最高的初始值。尽管含氟纳米复合材料释放的氟水平低于传统玻璃离子水门汀和树脂改性玻璃离子材料,但它们显示出显著的防龋潜力和临床适用性,一些配方支持正畸托槽周围的牙周再生和龋齿预防。然而,研究方案缺乏一致性——包括储存介质、样品几何形状和测量方法的差异——限制了结果的直接比较。因此,未来研究最关键的方向是制定标准化测试方案,以确保跨材料组获得可靠、可比的结果。