Dagdeviren Emrah, Tercan Can, Yeniocak Ali Selcuk, Cigdem Busra, Ataseven Elif, Varlik Akin, Kilic Mehmet Fatih, Kaya Yucel
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul 34480, Turkey.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Merkezefendi State Hospital, Manisa 45120, Turkey.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 25;15(17):2146. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172146.
To assess the correlation and agreement of uterocervical angle (UCA) measurements obtained via transabdominal (TAUS), transperineal (TPUS), and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation. In this prospective cross-sectional study, 136 pregnant women underwent UCA and cervical length (CL) assessments using TVUS, TAUS, and TPUS. All measurements were performed by a single experienced operator with an empty bladder. Correlation was assessed using Pearson analysis, while consistency and agreement were evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Mean UCA values differed significantly between modalities ( < 0.001). Moderate correlation (r = 0.547) and consistency (ICC = 0.545) were found between TAUS and TVUS. The Bland-Altman analysis showed a systematic bias of -8° between TAUS and TVUS, with wide limits of agreement (-64° to +32.6°). TPUS showed a higher correlation with TVUS (r = 0.686), but poor consistency (ICC = 0.052), with broader limits of agreement (-32° to +49.2°). Although both TAUS and TPUS showed significant correlation with TVUS for UCA measurement, only TAUS demonstrated moderate consistency, suggesting that it should be used cautiously in clinical practice. TPUS demonstrated considerable variability in individual assessments and does not seem appropriate as a replacement for TVUS. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and improve measurement reliability.
评估经腹超声(TAUS)、经会阴超声(TPUS)和经阴道超声(TVUS)在妊娠16至24周时测量子宫颈角度(UCA)的相关性和一致性。在这项前瞻性横断面研究中,136名孕妇接受了TVUS、TAUS和TPUS对UCA及宫颈长度(CL)的评估。所有测量均由一名经验丰富的操作者在膀胱排空状态下进行。使用Pearson分析评估相关性,同时使用组内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman图评估一致性和一致性。不同检查方式之间的平均UCA值差异有统计学意义(<0.001)。TAUS与TVUS之间存在中度相关性(r = 0.547)和一致性(ICC = 0.545)。Bland-Altman分析显示TAUS与TVUS之间存在-8°的系统偏差,一致性界限较宽(-64°至+32.6°)。TPUS与TVUS的相关性更高(r = 0.686),但一致性较差(ICC = 0.(此处原文有误,应为0.052)),一致性界限更宽(-32°至+49.2°)。虽然TAUS和TPUS在测量UCA时与TVUS均显示出显著相关性,但只有TAUS表现出中度一致性,这表明在临床实践中应谨慎使用。TPUS在个体评估中表现出相当大的变异性,似乎不适合替代TVUS。需要进一步研究来验证这些发现并提高测量的可靠性。