Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal United Hospital, Bath BA1 3NG, UK.
Department ofObstetrics and Gynecology, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.
Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Sep 1;23(5):533-547. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx019.
This review focuses on the initial presentation of women who suspect that they are infertile, and how best to assess the anatomy of their uterus and ovaries in order to investigate the cause of their infertility, and potentially improve desired fertility outcomes. This review was undertaken as part of a World Health Organization initiative to assess the evidence available to address guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of infertility within a global context. Providing access to care for infertile women will help to ease the psycho-social burdens, such as ostracization, intimate partner violence and other negative consequences of being involuntarily childless or unable to become pregnant despite desiring a biological child or children.
The aim of this paper was to present an evidence base for the diagnostic and prognostic value of various investigations used for detecting uterine and/or ovarian pathology in women presenting at fertility clinics for their initial assessment.
We performed a comprehensive search of relevant studies on 28 August and 10 September 2014. A further search was performed on 6 June 2016 to ensure all possible studies were captured. These strategies were not limited by date or language. The search returned 3968 publications in total; 63 full text articles were retrieved and 10 additional studies were found through hand-searching. After excluding 54, a total of 19 studies were analysed. We extracted and tabulated data on the characteristics, quality and results of each eligible study and combined the findings in a narrative synthesis. Risk of bias was assessed according to article type using tools such as assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews, Newcastle Ottawa Scale, Cochrane risk of bias tool, quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies and quality in prognostic studies. Nineteen studies were selected as being the best evidence available. A narrative synthesis of the data was undertaken. Discussion of the data, and resultant consensus for best practice were accomplished in a consensus expert consultation in Geneva, October 2015. An independent expert review process concerning this work and outcomes was conducted during 2016.
The draft recommendations presented here apply to infertile women whether or not they are undergoing fertility treatment. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) should be offered to all infertile women with symptoms or signs of anatomic pelvic pathology. TVUS should not be offered routinely to women without symptoms of pelvic pathology. Hysteroscopy should be offered if intrauterine pathology is suspected by TVUS. Hysteroscopy should not be routinely offered to infertile women who have normal TVUS findings. In women who have normal TVUS findings and are undergoing IVF, hysteroscopy does not improve the outcome. Good practice points recommend that providers of fertility care should confirm that all infertile women have a recent pelvic examination, recent cervical screening and well-woman screening in line with local guidelines. Additionally, hystero-contrast salpingography in infertile women does not improve clinical pregnancy rates with expectant management in heterosexual couples and should not be offered as a therapeutic procedure. Most of the findings of this review on diagnosis are based on a low, or very low, quality of evidence, according to GRADE Working Group (grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation) criteria. A low quality grading indicates that further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate, while a very low grade indicates that any estimate of effect is very uncertain.
This review provides the most reliable evidence available to guide clinicians worldwide in the initial, evidence-based investigation of women with fertility problems in order to undertake the most useful investigation and avoid the burden of unnecessary tests.
本次综述重点关注疑似不孕的女性的初始表现,以及如何最好地评估子宫和卵巢的解剖结构,以调查其不孕的原因,并有可能改善预期的生育结果。本次综述是世界卫生组织(WHO)评估全球范围内不孕诊断和治疗指南的证据的一部分。为不孕女性提供治疗将有助于减轻她们的心理社会负担,例如被排斥、亲密伴侣暴力以及其他因无法怀孕而产生的负面后果,尽管她们渴望拥有一个或多个孩子。
本文旨在为在生育诊所进行初步评估的不孕女性提供用于检测子宫和/或卵巢病变的各种检查的诊断和预后价值的证据基础。
我们于 2014 年 8 月 28 日和 9 月 10 日进行了全面的相关研究检索。于 2016 年 6 月 6 日进行了进一步检索,以确保捕获所有可能的研究。这些策略不受日期或语言的限制。该检索共返回 3968 篇出版物;检索到 63 篇全文文章,并通过手工检索发现了另外 10 项研究。在排除 54 项研究后,共分析了 19 项研究。我们提取并编制了每个合格研究的特征、质量和结果的数据,并以叙述性综合的方式合并了研究结果。根据文章类型使用工具评估偏倚风险,例如系统评价的方法学质量评估、纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表、Cochrane 偏倚风险工具、诊断准确性研究的质量评估工具和预后研究的质量评估工具。选择了 19 项研究作为现有最佳证据。对数据进行了叙述性综合。2015 年 10 月在日内瓦举行了一次共识专家咨询会,对数据进行了讨论,并就最佳实践达成了共识。2016 年期间对这项工作和结果进行了独立的专家审查。
这里提出的建议草案适用于有或没有接受生育治疗的不孕女性。有盆腔病理症状或体征的不孕女性应接受经阴道超声(TVUS)检查。没有盆腔病理症状的女性不应常规接受 TVUS 检查。如果 TVUS 怀疑存在子宫内病变,则应进行宫腔镜检查。如果 TVUS 检查结果正常,不应常规对不孕女性进行宫腔镜检查。在 TVUS 检查结果正常且正在接受体外受精的女性中,宫腔镜检查并不能改善结局。良好的实践建议建议生育护理提供者应确认所有不孕女性最近都进行了盆腔检查、最近进行了宫颈筛查以及按照当地指南进行了常规女性健康筛查。此外,在异性恋夫妇中,对不孕女性进行子宫输卵管造影术并不能提高期待治疗的临床妊娠率,不应作为一种治疗性程序。本次综述中关于诊断的大多数发现都是基于低或极低质量的证据,根据 GRADE 工作组(推荐分级的评估、制定与评价)标准。低质量分级表示进一步研究很可能对我们对效应估计的信心产生重大影响,并可能改变估计值,而极低质量分级表示任何效应估计值都非常不确定。
本次综述提供了最可靠的证据,指导全球临床医生在对有生育问题的女性进行初始的基于证据的调查,以进行最有用的检查,并避免不必要的检查带来的负担。