• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于实车测试事故场景的智能汽车接管安全性研究

Research on Takeover Safety of Intelligent Vehicles Based on Accident Scenarios in Real-Vehicle Testing.

作者信息

Li Pingfei, Zhou Meiling, Xu Chang, Li He, Hu Wenhao, Tan Zhengping, Xiao Lingyun, Mou Xiaojun, Feng Hao

机构信息

School of Automation Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China.

School of Automobile and Transportation, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2025 Sep 7;25(17):5589. doi: 10.3390/s25175589.

DOI:10.3390/s25175589
PMID:40943018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12430937/
Abstract

With the increasing emergence of intelligent vehicles, novel accident patterns have gradually emerged. In human-machine cooperative driving (HMCD) states, despite driving automation systems being capable of controlling lateral and longitudinal vehicle motions over extended periods, functional limitations persist in specific scenarios due to insufficient expected functionalities. When combined with risk factors, such as driver distraction, these limitations significantly elevate accident risks. This study investigated takeover safety through real vehicle testing in two typical accident scenarios: large-curvature curves and static obstacles. The key findings include the following: (1) in scenarios involving large curvature curves and static obstacles, vehicles are prone to lane departure and missed target detection, which are typical dangerous scenarios; (2) during the human-machine cooperative driving phase, the design of the driving automation system should focus on enhancing driver engagement in driving tasks, while in the autonomous driving phase, the vehicle's early warning capabilities should be strengthened; (3) the takeover request for longitudinal control requires at least 4.12 s of driver reaction time, while the takeover request for lateral control requires at least 1.87 s. This study provides important theoretical and practical references for safety in designing assisted driving systems and the testing of hazardous scenarios.

摘要

随着智能车辆的日益涌现,新型事故模式逐渐出现。在人机协同驾驶(HMCD)状态下,尽管驾驶自动化系统能够在较长时间内控制车辆的横向和纵向运动,但由于预期功能不足,在特定场景中仍存在功能限制。当与诸如驾驶员分心等风险因素相结合时,这些限制会显著提高事故风险。本研究通过在两种典型事故场景(大曲率弯道和静态障碍物)下的实车测试来研究接管安全性。主要研究结果如下:(1)在涉及大曲率弯道和静态障碍物的场景中,车辆容易发生车道偏离和目标检测遗漏,这些都是典型的危险场景;(2)在人机协同驾驶阶段,驾驶自动化系统的设计应侧重于增强驾驶员对驾驶任务的参与度,而在自动驾驶阶段,则应加强车辆的预警能力;(3)纵向控制的接管请求至少需要驾驶员4.12秒的反应时间,而横向控制的接管请求至少需要1.87秒。本研究为辅助驾驶系统设计中的安全性以及危险场景测试提供了重要的理论和实践参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/15e697ea4d17/sensors-25-05589-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/0cf2707c553b/sensors-25-05589-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/92c888eed5ab/sensors-25-05589-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/b0d0542b2f79/sensors-25-05589-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/d6a6d111a441/sensors-25-05589-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/ce3c645b5e8e/sensors-25-05589-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/f40599c3003d/sensors-25-05589-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/b48761c20371/sensors-25-05589-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/a700f52fa2ef/sensors-25-05589-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/b9ba8ca79546/sensors-25-05589-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/ab50d1db5ffc/sensors-25-05589-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/e2402488da42/sensors-25-05589-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/0b30c111e6b2/sensors-25-05589-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/aef45e55c3fa/sensors-25-05589-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/15e697ea4d17/sensors-25-05589-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/0cf2707c553b/sensors-25-05589-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/92c888eed5ab/sensors-25-05589-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/b0d0542b2f79/sensors-25-05589-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/d6a6d111a441/sensors-25-05589-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/ce3c645b5e8e/sensors-25-05589-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/f40599c3003d/sensors-25-05589-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/b48761c20371/sensors-25-05589-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/a700f52fa2ef/sensors-25-05589-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/b9ba8ca79546/sensors-25-05589-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/ab50d1db5ffc/sensors-25-05589-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/e2402488da42/sensors-25-05589-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/0b30c111e6b2/sensors-25-05589-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/aef45e55c3fa/sensors-25-05589-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade9/12430937/15e697ea4d17/sensors-25-05589-g014.jpg

相似文献

1
Research on Takeover Safety of Intelligent Vehicles Based on Accident Scenarios in Real-Vehicle Testing.基于实车测试事故场景的智能汽车接管安全性研究
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Sep 7;25(17):5589. doi: 10.3390/s25175589.
2
Impact of information-assisted modalities and levels on driver takeover performance in conditional automated driving.信息辅助方式和水平对条件自动驾驶中驾驶员接管性能的影响
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Jul 7;220:108158. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2025.108158.
3
Driver behavior and mental workload for takeover safety in automated driving: ACT-R prediction modeling approach.自动驾驶接管安全中的驾驶员行为和心理负荷:ACT-R 预测建模方法。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(3):381-389. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2300640. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Convenience or safety system? Crash rates of vehicles equipped with partial driving automation.便利还是安全系统?配备部分驾驶自动化功能车辆的碰撞率
Traffic Inj Prev. 2025;26(6):631-641. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2448511. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
6
CoRTSG: A general and effective framework of risky testing scenario generation for cooperative perception in mixed traffic.CoRTSG:混合交通中用于协同感知的风险测试场景生成的通用有效框架。
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Sep;220:108163. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2025.108163. Epub 2025 Jul 12.
7
Vision screening of older drivers for preventing road traffic injuries and fatalities.对老年驾驶员进行视力筛查以预防道路交通伤害和死亡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 21;2014(2):CD006252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006252.pub4.
8
Exploring autonomous vehicle crash risk: system coupling effects and key causal factors.
J Safety Res. 2025 Sep;94:284-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2025.06.029. Epub 2025 Jul 3.
9
Using a visual attentional task and eye-tracking to investigate the effects of pre-takeover resource engagement on attention restoration in conditionally automated driving.使用视觉注意力任务和眼动追踪来研究在条件自动驾驶中,接管前资源投入对注意力恢复的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2025;26(5):506-514. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2427865. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
10
Analysis of secondary risks induced by defensive braking in autonomous vehicles: a study based on stochastic distribution of drivers.自动驾驶车辆中防御性制动引发的二次风险分析:基于驾驶员随机分布的研究
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Sep;220:108176. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2025.108176. Epub 2025 Jul 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting drivers' takeover time for safe and comfortable vehicle control transitions: The role of spare capacity and driver characteristics.
Appl Ergon. 2025 Nov;129:104603. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104603. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
2
Intelligent vehicle lateral control strategy research based on feedforward + predictive LQR algorithm with GA optimisation and PID compensation.基于遗传算法优化及PID补偿的前馈+预测LQR算法的智能车辆横向控制策略研究
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22317. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72960-5.
3
Impact of Partially Automated Driving Functions on Forensic Accident Reconstruction: A Simulator Study on Driver Reaction Behavior in the Event of a Malfunctioning System Behavior.部分自动驾驶功能对事故重建的影响:系统故障时驾驶员反应行为的模拟器研究
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Dec 12;23(24):9785. doi: 10.3390/s23249785.
4
Safety improvements by intelligent connected vehicle technologies: A meta-analysis considering market penetration rates.智能网联汽车技术的安全改进:考虑市场渗透率的荟萃分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106234. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106234. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
5
Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles: Noncritical Transitions to and From Manual Control.高度自动化车辆的接管时间:手动控制的非关键转换
Hum Factors. 2017 Jun;59(4):689-705. doi: 10.1177/0018720816685832. Epub 2017 Jan 26.