Disha Migena, Philip Legate, Dumitrescu Daniel, Rudolph Volker, Brinkmann Regine, Ayoub Mohamed
Department of General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Heart and Diabetes Center NRW, Ruhr University Bochum, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Porthsmouth Hsopitals University NHS Trust-Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK.
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 3;14(17):6211. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176211.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of mortality worldwide, accounting for 7.3% of all deaths in Germany. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) remains the gold standard for diagnosing CAD, yet coronary computed tomography angiography (CTCA) is gaining recognition as a non-invasive alternative. Recent clinical trials have confirmed CTCA's diagnostic accuracy, leading to its inclusion in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. Despite this, its adoption in Germany has been slow. This single-center, non-randomized study at the Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia (HDZ NRW) evaluated CTCA's safety and diagnostic performance. We included patients with low to intermediate pre-test probability (PTP) referred for cardiac catheterization between 2019 and 2022. The primary outcome was the change in the Wall Motion Score Index (ΔWMSI), with a threshold of 0.37 indicating significant mortality risk. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, angina at follow-up, and myocardial revascularization procedures. A total of 100 patients were enrolled; 30 underwent CTCA, and 70 had ICA. The mean patient age was 63 years, with 33% female. Of the 63 patients who completed follow-up (41 ICA, 22 CTCA), no significant differences in cardiovascular outcomes or mortality were observed. CTCA effectively ruled out CAD in low-risk patients, with a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 77%. CTCA was faster (4.7 vs. 20.2 h) but had a higher radiation dose (2.3 vs. 1.5 mSv). CTCA is a viable, non-invasive alternative for diagnosing low- to intermediate-risk CAD patients. Further studies are needed to confirm its clinical benefits.
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是全球主要的死亡原因,在德国占所有死亡人数的7.3%。有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)仍然是诊断CAD的金标准,但冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTCA)作为一种无创替代方法正逐渐得到认可。最近的临床试验证实了CTCA的诊断准确性,这使其被纳入2019年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)指南。尽管如此,其在德国的应用一直很缓慢。这项在北莱茵-威斯特法伦州心脏与糖尿病中心(HDZ NRW)进行的单中心、非随机研究评估了CTCA的安全性和诊断性能。我们纳入了2019年至2022年间因心脏导管插入术而被转诊的低至中度预检概率(PTP)的患者。主要结局是壁运动评分指数(ΔWMSI)的变化,阈值为0.37表明存在显著的死亡风险。次要结局包括心血管死亡率、心肌梗死、随访时的心绞痛以及心肌血运重建手术。总共招募了100名患者;30名接受了CTCA,70名接受了ICA。患者的平均年龄为63岁,女性占比33%。在完成随访的63名患者中(41名接受ICA,22名接受CTCA),未观察到心血管结局或死亡率的显著差异。CTCA在低风险患者中有效地排除了CAD,敏感性为75%,特异性为77%。CTCA速度更快(4.7小时对20.2小时),但辐射剂量更高(2.3毫希沃特对1.5毫希沃特)。CTCA是诊断低至中度风险CAD患者的一种可行的无创替代方法。需要进一步的研究来证实其临床益处。