Zhang Dongxu, Zhao Xinhua, Li Hongping, Chen Wen, Liu Cunzhi
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Tumor Center, Beijing Anorectal Hospital, Beijing, China.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Sep 13;33(10):850. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09861-4.
Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer worldwide, and nearly 30% of affected patients experience breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Some evidence suggests that acupuncture and moxibustion therapies are safe and effective in the treatment of BCRL. Nevertheless, there is controversy regarding the optimal acupuncture and moxibustion therapy for BCRL.
The aim of this study was to compare and rank the efficacy of different acupuncture and moxibustion therapies for BCRL, to identify the best acupuncture and moxibustion therapy for BCRL, and to provide a reference for clinicians to choose the treatment modality.
We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, CQVIP, Wanfang Data, and SINOMED Databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture and moxibustion therapy for BCRL from inception to March 30, 2023. The quality of the included literature was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment, and data were analyzed and plotted using R4.3.2 and Stata 15.1 software.
We included 27 RCTs including 8 acupuncture interventions with a sample size of 1976 cases. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that acupuncture + moxibustion, moxibustion, blood-letting puncture and cupping, and electroacupuncture combined with conventional rehabilitation were superior to conventional rehabilitation alone in reducing arm circumference. Moxibustion combined with conventional rehabilitation was superior to conventional rehabilitation alone in reducing the degree of edema. Electroacupuncture and acupoint massage combined with conventional rehabilitation were superior to conventional rehabilitation alone in reducing the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. And in terms of improving the mobility of the shoulder joint, moxibustion and electroacupuncture combined with conventional rehabilitation were better than conventional rehabilitation alone.
The combination of acupuncture and moxibustion therapy with conventional rehabilitation can improve the efficacy of BCRL. Acupuncture + moxibustion was the best treatment modality to reduce arm circumference, acupuncture was the best modality to reduce edema, and electroacupuncture was the most effective modality for relieving BCRL pain symptoms and was the best choice to improve abduction range of motion (ROM). Due to the limitations of this study, this conclusion remains to be validated by further high-quality clinical studies.
乳腺癌是全球最常见的癌症,近30%的乳腺癌患者会出现与乳腺癌相关的淋巴水肿(BCRL)。一些证据表明,针灸和艾灸疗法在治疗BCRL方面安全有效。然而,对于BCRL的最佳针灸和艾灸疗法仍存在争议。
本研究旨在比较和排序不同针灸和艾灸疗法对BCRL的疗效,确定BCRL的最佳针灸和艾灸疗法,并为临床医生选择治疗方式提供参考。
我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、科学网、谷歌学术、中国知网、维普资讯、万方数据和中国生物医学文献数据库,以查找从建库至2023年3月30日期间关于针灸和艾灸疗法治疗BCRL的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用Cochrane偏倚风险评估对纳入文献的质量进行评估,并使用R4.3.2和Stata 15.1软件进行数据分析和绘图。
我们纳入了27项RCT,包括8种针灸干预措施,样本量为1976例。网络荟萃分析结果显示,针灸 + 艾灸、艾灸、放血拔罐以及电针联合传统康复在减少上臂围方面优于单纯传统康复。艾灸联合传统康复在减轻水肿程度方面优于单纯传统康复。电针和穴位按摩联合传统康复在降低视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分方面优于单纯传统康复。在改善肩关节活动度方面,艾灸和电针联合传统康复比单纯传统康复更好。
针灸和艾灸疗法与传统康复相结合可提高BCRL的疗效。针灸 + 艾灸是减少上臂围的最佳治疗方式,针刺是减轻水肿的最佳方式,电针是缓解BCRL疼痛症状最有效的方式,也是改善外展活动范围(ROM)的最佳选择。由于本研究的局限性,这一结论仍有待进一步高质量的临床研究验证。