Suppr超能文献

心理社会研究中的正念:关于研究内容与研究方式的综合文献综述

Mindfulness in Psychosocial Research: An Integrative Literature Review of What is Studied and How.

作者信息

Chachignon Philippine, Le Barbenchon Emmanuelle, Dany Lionel

机构信息

Aix Marseille University, LPS, Aix-en Provence, France.

出版信息

Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul 7;38:9. doi: 10.5334/irsp.1000. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

In the mindfulness field, reviews of its clinical effects prevail, along with critical articles on its applications serving neoliberalism. Conversely, less is known of the psychosocial perspective on mindfulness. To address this question, knowledge needs to be gathered on the applied fields and research topics, theoretical frameworks, study designs and methodologies mobilized, main results and levels of explanation in social psychology. We conducted an integrative review of the literature in February 2022, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses methodology using PsychInfo/PsychArticles. One hundred and nine papers met the inclusion criteria. Applied fields encompass well-being, daily social relationships, health and organizations. Only 21 references were embedded in theories. Forty-two percent of the theories were identified as social psychology theories. Most studies were correlational (46%) or experimental (47%) with quantitative methods. The effects of mindfulness are primarily beneficial, with a strong focus on emotion regulation and stress management at both intra- and inter-individual levels, while less attention is given to group or ideological contexts. We argue that research on mindfulness is predominantly conducted using Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic samples, often without considering participants' socio-economic backgrounds. Additionally, the prevailing psychosocial perspective on mindfulness tends to adopt a positivist epistemology, largely situated within micro-level contexts, while overlooking the broader macro-social dimensions of human experience.

摘要

在正念领域,对其临床效果的综述盛行,同时也有关于其服务新自由主义应用的批判性文章。相反,从社会心理角度对正念的了解较少。为了解决这个问题,需要收集关于应用领域和研究主题、理论框架、所采用的研究设计和方法、主要结果以及社会心理学中的解释层面等方面的知识。我们于2022年2月按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目方法,使用PsychInfo/PsychArticles对文献进行了综合综述。109篇论文符合纳入标准。应用领域包括幸福感、日常社会关系、健康和组织。只有21篇参考文献嵌入了理论之中。42%的理论被确定为社会心理学理论。大多数研究采用相关性研究(46%)或实验性研究(47%),并运用定量方法。正念的效果主要是有益的,重点强烈聚焦于个体内部和个体间层面的情绪调节和压力管理,而对群体或意识形态背景的关注较少。我们认为,关于正念的研究主要使用西方、受过教育、工业化、富裕和民主的样本进行,通常没有考虑参与者的社会经济背景。此外,关于正念流行的社会心理视角倾向于采用实证主义认识论,大多局限于微观层面的背景,而忽视了人类体验更广泛的宏观社会维度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca9/12372696/537b21b6b115/irsp-38-1000-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验