• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种经过校准用于分析 和错配修复基因变异的基于细胞的功能检测方法。 (原文中“and”前后内容缺失,请补充完整后再准确翻译)

A Cell-Based Functional Assay Calibrated for Analysis of and Mismatch Repair Gene Variants.

作者信息

Szabo Elizabeth, Blackburn Emily, Amodeo Olivia N, Nadeau Samantha, Radecki Alexander A, Grady James P, Rath Abhijit, Heinen Christopher D

机构信息

Center for Molecular Oncology, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Hum Mutat. 2025 Sep 6;2025:3923193. doi: 10.1155/humu/3923193. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1155/humu/3923193
PMID:40948606
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12433325/
Abstract

Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes can confound the diagnosis and treatment of suspected Lynch syndrome (LS) patients. To aid the reclassification of VUS, we developed the in cellulo analysis of MMR variants (inCAMA) and used known control variants to calibrate this assay such that results can be readily applied as functional evidence by expert classification panels. We used CRISPR gene engineering to introduce known pathogenic and benign variants into the or loci in human embryonic stem cells and assessed their effects on cellular MMR repair and damage response functions. Our functional assay successfully discerned known pathogenic and benign variants. Using these results and performing a linear regression analysis with available odds of pathogenicity scores for the known calibration variants, we created equations that can generate a functional odds of pathogenicity score for any future or variant tested. In summary, inCAMA represents a new, calibrated assay for testing the function of virtually any or variant. The conversion of assay results directly into odds of pathogenicity scores makes it possible to use any PS3 or BS3 evidence strength level toward the reclassification of VUS.

摘要

DNA错配修复(MMR)基因中意义未明的变异(VUS)会混淆疑似林奇综合征(LS)患者的诊断和治疗。为了辅助VUS的重新分类,我们开发了MMR变异的细胞内分析方法(inCAMA),并使用已知的对照变异来校准该检测方法,以便专家分类小组能够将结果作为功能证据直接应用。我们使用CRISPR基因工程技术将已知的致病和良性变异引入人类胚胎干细胞的 或 基因座,并评估它们对细胞MMR修复和损伤反应功能的影响。我们的功能检测成功区分了已知的致病和良性变异。利用这些结果,并对已知校准变异的可用致病性评分几率进行线性回归分析,我们创建了一些方程,可为未来检测的任何 或 变异生成功能性致病性评分几率。总之,inCAMA代表了一种全新的、经过校准的检测方法,可用于检测几乎任何 或 变异的功能。将检测结果直接转换为致病性评分几率,使得在VUS重新分类时可以使用任何PS3或BS3证据强度水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29e2/12433325/837321626a75/HUMU2025-3923193.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29e2/12433325/2f40a206519c/HUMU2025-3923193.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29e2/12433325/babd40e5e858/HUMU2025-3923193.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29e2/12433325/2b6815dcae65/HUMU2025-3923193.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29e2/12433325/837321626a75/HUMU2025-3923193.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29e2/12433325/2f40a206519c/HUMU2025-3923193.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29e2/12433325/babd40e5e858/HUMU2025-3923193.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29e2/12433325/2b6815dcae65/HUMU2025-3923193.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29e2/12433325/837321626a75/HUMU2025-3923193.004.jpg

相似文献

1
A Cell-Based Functional Assay Calibrated for Analysis of and Mismatch Repair Gene Variants.一种经过校准用于分析 和错配修复基因变异的基于细胞的功能检测方法。 (原文中“and”前后内容缺失,请补充完整后再准确翻译)
Hum Mutat. 2025 Sep 6;2025:3923193. doi: 10.1155/humu/3923193. eCollection 2025.
2
Gene-Specific Variation in Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Strategies for Lynch Syndrome.林奇综合征结直肠癌监测策略中的基因特异性变异。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Aug;161(2):453-462.e15. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.04.010. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
3
MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2 immunohistochemistry as highly sensitive screening method for DNA mismatch repair deficiency syndromes in pediatric high-grade glioma.MSH2、MSH6、MLH1和PMS2免疫组化作为小儿高级别胶质瘤中DNA错配修复缺陷综合征的高灵敏度筛查方法。
Acta Neuropathol. 2025 Feb 2;149(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s00401-025-02846-x.
4
Characteristics of Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colon Cancer in Relation to Mismatch Repair Protein Loss, Hypermethylation Silencing, and Constitutional and Biallelic Somatic Mismatch Repair Gene Pathogenic Variants.错配修复缺陷型结直肠癌的特征与错配修复蛋白缺失、高甲基化沉默以及胚系和双等位基因体细胞错配修复基因致病性变异有关。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Apr 1;66(4):549-558. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002452. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
5
Functional interrogation of Lynch syndrome-associated MSH2 missense variants via CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in human embryonic stem cells.通过 CRISPR-Cas9 基因编辑在人胚胎干细胞中对林奇综合征相关 MSH2 错义变异体进行功能研究。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Nov;40(11):2044-2056. doi: 10.1002/humu.23848. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
6
From gaps to compliance: a 12-year retrospective cohort study of trends in mismatch repair protein testing and Lynch syndrome identification in colorectal cancer in Central Switzerland.从差距到合规:瑞士中部地区结直肠癌错配修复蛋白检测及林奇综合征识别趋势的12年回顾性队列研究
Swiss Med Wkly. 2025 Jul 14;155:4345. doi: 10.57187/s.4345.
7
Gene-specific Detection Rate of Adenomas and Advanced Adenomas in Lynch Syndrome.林奇综合征中腺瘤和高级别腺瘤的基因特异性检测率
Gastroenterology. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.03.042.
8
A series of reviews in familial cancer: genetic cancer risk in context variants of uncertain significance in MMR genes: which procedures should be followed?一系列关于家族性癌症的综述:错配修复(MMR)基因中意义不确定的背景变异的遗传性癌症风险:应遵循哪些程序?
Fam Cancer. 2025 May 3;24(2):42. doi: 10.1007/s10689-025-00470-y.
9
Characterization of mismatch-repair/microsatellite instability-discordant endometrial cancers.错配修复/微卫星不稳定不一致型子宫内膜癌的特征。
Cancer. 2024 Feb 1;130(3):385-399. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35030. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
10
Lower Degree of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Carcinomas From MSH6-Associated Lynch Syndrome Patients.MSH6相关林奇综合征患者结直肠癌中微卫星不稳定性程度较低
Mod Pathol. 2025 Jul;38(7):100757. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100757. Epub 2025 Mar 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Characterization of a germline variant MSH6 c.4001G > C in a Lynch syndrome family.一个林奇综合征家系中 MSH6 c.4001G > C 种系变异的特征。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2023 Feb;11(2):e2104. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.2104. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
2
A calibrated cell-based functional assay to aid classification of MLH1 DNA mismatch repair gene variants.一种经校准的基于细胞的功能测定法,辅助 MLH1 DNA 错配修复基因突变的分类。
Hum Mutat. 2022 Dec;43(12):2295-2307. doi: 10.1002/humu.24462. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
3
Classification of MSH6 Variants of Uncertain Significance Using Functional Assays.
采用功能检测方法对 MSH6 意义未明的变异进行分类。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Aug 11;22(16):8627. doi: 10.3390/ijms22168627.
4
Linking genome variants to disease: scalable approaches to test the functional impact of human mutations.将基因组变异与疾病联系起来:可扩展的方法来测试人类突变的功能影响。
Hum Mol Genet. 2021 Oct 1;30(R2):R187-R197. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddab219.
5
Massively parallel functional testing of MSH2 missense variants conferring Lynch syndrome risk.大规模平行功能测试导致林奇综合征风险的 MSH2 错义变异体。
Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Jan 7;108(1):163-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
6
Molecular pathology of Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征的分子病理学。
J Pathol. 2020 Apr;250(5):518-531. doi: 10.1002/path.5422.
7
Two integrated and highly predictive functional analysis-based procedures for the classification of MSH6 variants in Lynch syndrome.两种基于功能分析的综合且高度预测性方法,用于 Lynch 综合征中 MSH6 变异的分类。
Genet Med. 2020 May;22(5):847-856. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0736-2. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
8
Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework.使用 ACMG/AMP 序列变异解读框架推荐功能证据 PS3/BS3 标准的应用。
Genome Med. 2019 Dec 31;12(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0690-2.
9
Functional interrogation of Lynch syndrome-associated MSH2 missense variants via CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in human embryonic stem cells.通过 CRISPR-Cas9 基因编辑在人胚胎干细胞中对林奇综合征相关 MSH2 错义变异体进行功能研究。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Nov;40(11):2044-2056. doi: 10.1002/humu.23848. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
10
The mismatch repair-dependent DNA damage response: Mechanisms and implications.错配修复依赖性 DNA 损伤反应:机制与意义。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2019 Jun;78:60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Apr 1.