Suppr超能文献

多灶性肺结节中主要病灶的术前诊断准确性

Preoperative diagnostic accuracy of dominant lesion in multifocal pulmonary nodules.

作者信息

Zhao Bowen, Su Xiaoyun, Huang Yu, Zhang Chi, Ye Guanchao, Wu Junhua, Fan Shiwen, Chen Ming, Li Kuo, Yang Fan, Wu Guangyao, Liao Yongde

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 Aug 31;14(8):3042-3053. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2025-419. Epub 2025 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to the widespread implementation of computed tomography (CT) in lung cancer screening, multifocal pulmonary nodules (MPNs) are increasingly detected. Given the importance of selecting preoperative dominant lesions (DLs) in the management of MPNs, this study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of commonly used approaches for assessment of preoperative DLs.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical resection and CT for MPNs from May 2019 to September 2023 were retrospectively collected from a single center. The postoperative DLs were determined based on the pathology results. Four methods were employed to identify preoperative DLs including diameter, Mayo model, Brock model, and Peking University multiple pulmonary nodules malignancy prediction model (PKU-M model) and the predictive results of these methods were compared with postoperative DLs. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the type of nodules.

RESULTS

A total of 999 patients with 2,285 nodules were included in this study. The accuracy of the proposed methods including diameter, Mayo model, Brock model, and PKU-M model for the assessment of preoperative DLs were 81.09%, 78.69%, 81.73%, and 78.77%, respectively. Compared to the pathology results, the Kappa values for the four methods were 0.62, 0.51, 0.59, and 0.51, respectively. Among the three subgroups, four methods applied in subsolid nodule group demonstrated the best performance with accuracy of 83.07%, 77.88%, 81.90% and 72.59%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Current assessment approaches for identifying preoperative DLs still have room for improvement and further studies are warranted to develop a more effective approach for the assessment of preoperative DLs.

摘要

背景

由于计算机断层扫描(CT)在肺癌筛查中的广泛应用,多灶性肺结节(MPN)的检出率日益增加。鉴于在MPN管理中选择术前主要病灶(DL)的重要性,本研究评估了常用的术前DL评估方法的诊断准确性。

方法

回顾性收集2019年5月至2023年9月在单一中心接受MPN手术切除和CT检查的患者。术后DL根据病理结果确定。采用四种方法识别术前DL,包括直径、梅奥模型、布罗克模型和北京大学多肺结节恶性预测模型(PKU-M模型),并将这些方法的预测结果与术后DL进行比较。根据结节类型进行亚组分析。

结果

本研究共纳入999例患者,2285个结节。所提出的方法,包括直径、梅奥模型、布罗克模型和PKU-M模型,评估术前DL的准确率分别为81.09%、78.69%、81.73%和78.77%。与病理结果相比,四种方法的Kappa值分别为0.62、0.51、0.59和0.51。在三个亚组中,应用于亚实性结节组的四种方法表现最佳,准确率分别为83.07%、77.88%、81.90%和72.59%。

结论

目前用于识别术前DL的评估方法仍有改进空间,有必要进一步开展研究以开发更有效的术前DL评估方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b6/12432639/fa61c174cb77/tlcr-14-08-3042-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验