Marano Giovanni, Schillaci Vincenzo, Arestia Alberto, Salito Armando Mariano, Allegra Marta, Shopova Gergana, Guerra Andrea Spadaro, Solimene Francesco
Clinica Montevergine, Mercogliano, AV, Italy.
BIOTRONIK Italia Spa, Cologno Monzese, MI, Italy.
J Cardiol Cases. 2025 Jun 11;32(3):138-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2025.05.010. eCollection 2025 Sep.
Mitral isthmus (MI) ablation is an essential part of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, particularly in redo procedures where pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is durable, but AF recurs. While radiofrequency (RF) ablation is commonly used, creating a complete MI line can be challenging and associated with significant risks. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) offers a safer alternative, providing tissue selectivity with fewer complications. This case report explores a hybrid endocardial and epicardial approach for PFA of mitral isthmus. Specifically, a 64-year-old woman with recurrent AF underwent a redo-ablation after two prior PVI procedures performed with RF. Electroanatomical mapping of the left atrium was performed using the INTELLAMAP ORION mini-basket catheter (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA). Mitral isthmus ablation was attempted with a linear contact force catheter connected to the CENTAURI PFA generator (CardioFocus, Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA). Initial endocardial PFA failed to achieve bidirectional block of the mitral isthmus. Additional RF bursts were deployed to injure Marshall bundle autonomic component since PFA alone is known to be ineffective in achieving nerve damage. The ablation catheter was then advanced into the coronary sinus for epicardial mapping, where a gap in the isthmus was identified. PFA delivered through the epicardium successfully achieved bidirectional block with no complications. Hybrid -epicardial ablation of mitral isthmus by PFA technology is effective and safe, providing a promising alternative to RF ablation in complex AF procedures.
Mitral isthmus (MI) block in addition to pulmonary vein isolation ablation could be required for treatment of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and high post-ablation recurrence rates. MI ablation with pulsed field ablation (PFA) technology can address challenges in traditional radiofrequency ablation, particularly in complex redo procedures. PFA based on a hybrid -epicardial approach with the CENTAURI system has shown to be effective and safe, offering a promising alternative to conventional techniques to achieve complete isthmus block.
二尖瓣峡部(MI)消融是持续性心房颤动(AF)消融的重要组成部分,尤其是在再次手术中,此时肺静脉隔离(PVI)已持久,但AF仍复发。虽然射频(RF)消融是常用方法,但创建完整的MI线可能具有挑战性且伴有重大风险。脉冲场消融(PFA)提供了一种更安全的替代方法,具有组织选择性且并发症较少。本病例报告探讨了一种用于二尖瓣峡部PFA的经心内膜和心外膜联合方法。具体而言,一名64岁复发性AF女性在先前两次使用RF进行PVI手术后接受了再次消融。使用INTELLAMAP ORION微型篮状导管(美国马萨诸塞州马尔伯勒市波士顿科学公司)对左心房进行电解剖标测。尝试使用连接到CENTAURI PFA发生器(美国马萨诸塞州马尔伯勒市CardioFocus公司)的线性接触力导管进行二尖瓣峡部消融。最初的心内膜PFA未能实现二尖瓣峡部的双向阻滞。由于已知仅PFA在实现神经损伤方面无效,因此额外施加了RF脉冲以损伤Marshall束自主成分。然后将消融导管推进到冠状窦进行心外膜标测,在此处发现峡部存在间隙。通过心外膜进行的PFA成功实现了双向阻滞且无并发症。PFA技术的心外膜联合消融对二尖瓣峡部有效且安全,为复杂AF手术中的RF消融提供了一种有前景的替代方法。
对于持续性心房颤动且消融后复发率高的患者,除肺静脉隔离消融外,可能还需要进行二尖瓣峡部(MI)阻滞。使用脉冲场消融(PFA)技术进行MI消融可以应对传统射频消融中的挑战,尤其是在复杂的再次手术中。基于CENTAURI系统的心外膜联合方法的PFA已显示出有效且安全,为实现完整峡部阻滞的传统技术提供了一种有前景的替代方法。