Suppr超能文献

胆总管结石手术治疗的临床病因及疗效分析

A Clinico-Etiology and an Outcome Analysis of Surgical Management of Choledocholithiasis.

作者信息

Amaravadi Sreekar, Challagundla Nag Naveen

机构信息

General Surgery, Chalmeda Ananda Rao Institute of Medical Sciences, Bommakal, IND.

Surgery, Dr. Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, Chinna Avutapalli, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Sep 11;17(9):e92099. doi: 10.7759/cureus.92099. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Aim To assess the postoperative outcomes of various surgical techniques for choledocholithiasis, such as open common bile duct (CBD) exploration, laparoscopic CBD exploration, and a combined endoscopic and surgical approach, with an emphasis on immediate morbidity and long-term results. Methods This non-randomized prospective observational study was conducted over two years, with a median follow-up of 12 months. The study included 50 patients diagnosed with CBD stones, and their demographic data, preoperative factors, interventions (endoscopic and surgical), and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results The mean age of the patients was 53.88±9.49 years and 27 (54%) patients were women. The primary symptom was abdominal pain (49, 98%), followed by jaundice (41, 82%) and fever (15, 30%). Complications related to CBD stones occurred in 15 (32%) cases, including acute cholangitis (11, 22%), gallstone pancreatitis (three, 6%), and choledochoduodenal fistula (two, 4%). Most stones were located in the mid-CBD in 22 (44%) cases and distal CBD in 20 (40%) cases. In terms of quantity, 29 (58%) had multiple stones, while 21 (42%) had one. Regarding the size, 16 (32%) stones were small, 20 (40%) were large, and three (6%) were very large. The mean CBD diameter was 15.09±5.99 mm, with most cases between 15 to 20 mm. The mean total bilirubin was 5.71 mg/dl, direct bilirubin 4.51 mg/dl, alkaline phosphatase 542.50 IU, and the international normalized ratio (INR) was 1.30. A comparative analysis of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic CBD exploration shows both methods produce similar short-term results (stone clearance, postoperative morbidity, hospital stay) and long-term outcomes (stone recurrence, strictures). However, the Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE) group had a significantly longer operative time, averaging 328±19.24 minutes, compared to 149.09±17.58 minutes for ERCP+LC. Long-term outcomes were also good, with a stricture and stone recurrence rate of 2.94%. A comparison of biliary drainage methods post-open CBD exploration (choledochoduodenostomy, Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, T-tube repair) showed similar short-term outcomes. The mean operative time for Roux-en-Y was 215±22.76 minutes, longer than choledochoduodenostomy (167.14±22.68 minutes) or T-tube repair (167.50±16.69 minutes). Conclusion Laparoscopic management of CBD stones requires significant expertise and has a steep learning curve. Our study shows that open CBD exploration is effective for complex CBD stone cases, especially after failed ERCP, despite higher short-term morbidity.

摘要

目的 评估胆总管结石的各种手术技术的术后结果,如开腹胆总管探查术、腹腔镜胆总管探查术以及内镜与手术联合治疗方法,重点关注近期发病率和长期结果。方法 这项非随机前瞻性观察性研究历时两年,中位随访时间为12个月。该研究纳入了50例被诊断为胆总管结石的患者,并对他们的人口统计学数据、术前因素、干预措施(内镜和手术)以及术后结果进行了分析。结果 患者的平均年龄为53.88±9.49岁,27例(54%)为女性。主要症状为腹痛(49例,98%),其次是黄疸(41例,82%)和发热(15例,30%)。与胆总管结石相关的并发症发生在15例(32%)患者中,包括急性胆管炎(11例,22%)、胆石性胰腺炎(3例,6%)和胆总管十二指肠瘘(2例,4%)。大多数结石位于胆总管中段,共22例(44%),位于胆总管下段的有20例(40%)。在数量方面,29例(58%)有多个结石,而21例(42%)有一个结石。在大小方面,16例(32%)结石较小,20例(40%)结石较大,并3例(6%)结石非常大。胆总管的平均直径为15.09±5.99mm,大多数病例在15至20mm之间。总胆红素平均为5.71mg/dl,直接胆红素为4.51mg/dl,碱性磷酸酶为542.50IU,国际标准化比值(INR)为1.30。对内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)和腹腔镜胆总管探查术的比较分析表明,两种方法产生相似的短期结果(结石清除率、术后发病率、住院时间)和长期结果(结石复发、狭窄)。然而,腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)组的手术时间明显更长,平均为328±19.24分钟,而ERCP+LC组为149.09±17.58分钟。长期结果也较好,狭窄和结石复发率为2.94%。对开腹胆总管探查术后的胆道引流方法(胆总管十二指肠吻合术、Roux-en-Y肝空肠吻合术、T管修复)的比较显示短期结果相似。Roux-en-Y肝空肠吻合术的平均手术时间为215±22.76分钟,长于胆总管十二指肠吻合术(167.14±22.68分钟)或T管修复术(167.50±16.69分钟)。结论 腹腔镜治疗胆总管结石需要丰富的专业知识,且学习曲线较陡。我们的研究表明,开腹胆总管探查术对复杂的胆总管结石病例有效,尤其是在ERCP失败后,尽管近期发病率较高。

相似文献

2
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 12;2013(12):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub4.
3
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 3(9):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub3.
5
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub2.

本文引用的文献

2
Common bile duct stones management: A network meta-analysis.胆总管结石的治疗:网状荟萃分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Nov 1;93(5):e155-e165. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003755. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
5
7
Surgical Management of Bile Duct Strictures.胆管狭窄的外科治疗
Indian J Surg. 2015 Apr;77(2):125-32. doi: 10.1007/s12262-013-0972-7. Epub 2013 Sep 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验