Spisak Natanael, de Manuel Marc, Przeworski Molly
Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York.
Institute of Evolutionary Biology, Barcelona.
bioRxiv. 2025 Sep 1:2025.08.28.672844. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.28.672844.
Mutations reflect the net effects of myriad types of damage, replication errors, and repair mechanisms, and thus are expected to differ across cell types with distinct exposures to mutagens, division rates, and cellular programs. Yet when mutations in humans are decomposed into a set of "signatures", one single base substitution signature, SBS5, is present across cell types and tissues, and predominates in post-mitotic neurons as well as male and female germlines [1-3]. The etiology of SBS5 is unknown. By modeling the processes by which mutations arise, we infer that SBS5 is the footprint of errors in DNA synthesis triggered by distinct types of DNA damage. Supporting this hypothesis, we find that SBS5 rates increase with signatures of endogenous and exogenous DNA damage in cancerous and non-cancerous cells and co-vary with repair rates along the genome as expected from model predictions. These analyses indicate that SBS5 captures the output of a "funnel", through which multiple sources of damage result in a similar mutation spectrum. As we further show, SBS5 mutations arise not only from translesion synthesis but also from DNA repair, suggesting that the signature reflects the occasional, shared use of a polymerase.
突变反映了多种类型的损伤、复制错误和修复机制的综合影响,因此预计在暴露于诱变剂、分裂速率和细胞程序不同的细胞类型之间存在差异。然而,当将人类的突变分解为一组“特征”时,一种单一碱基替换特征SBS5在各种细胞类型和组织中都存在,并且在有丝分裂后的神经元以及雄性和雌性生殖系中占主导地位[1-3]。SBS5的病因尚不清楚。通过对突变产生过程进行建模,我们推断SBS5是由不同类型的DNA损伤引发的DNA合成错误的印记。支持这一假设的是,我们发现SBS5的发生率随着癌细胞和非癌细胞中内源性和外源性DNA损伤的特征而增加,并且如模型预测所预期的那样,沿着基因组与修复率共同变化。这些分析表明,SBS5捕获了一个“漏斗”的输出,通过这个“漏斗”,多种损伤来源导致了相似的突变谱。正如我们进一步表明的那样,SBS5突变不仅源于跨损伤合成,还源于DNA修复,这表明该特征反映了聚合酶偶尔的、共同的使用情况。