• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重复产生的真实与道德:揭示接触对积极刻板印象认知的影响

True and Moral by Repetition: Unveiling the Impact of Exposure on Positive Stereotypes Perception.

作者信息

Mattavelli Simone, Bianchi Claudia, Brambilla Marco, Motterlini Matteo

机构信息

University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy.

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Italy.

出版信息

Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2024 Aug 7;37:14. doi: 10.5334/irsp.933. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.5334/irsp.933
PMID:40950734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12372772/
Abstract

Despite their apparent benevolence, positive stereotypes have negative effects on person and group perception. However, little is known about how exposure can intensify these negative consequences. In two pre-registered experiments (total N = 240) we investigated the effect of exposure on believability and moral condemnation of positive stereotypes. In Experiment 1, participants rated the truth value of positive stereotypes, which were either previously encountered or not during an exposure phase. Repeated positive stereotypes were perceived as more true than unrepeated ones, indicating a truth effect. In Experiment 2, we replicated the truth effect and further found that exposure to stereotypes reduced their moral condemnation, indicating a moral-repetition effect. Extending the truth effect and moral-repetition effect research to positive stereotypes, our findings emphasize the need to raise awareness of the impact of exposure on reinforcing the believability and moral condemnation of stereotypical beliefs.

摘要

尽管积极刻板印象表面上是善意的,但它们对个人和群体认知有负面影响。然而,对于接触如何加剧这些负面后果,我们知之甚少。在两项预先注册的实验(总样本量N = 240)中,我们研究了接触对积极刻板印象的可信度和道德谴责的影响。在实验1中,参与者对积极刻板印象的真值进行评分,这些刻板印象在接触阶段要么是之前遇到过的,要么是没有遇到过的。重复出现的积极刻板印象比未重复出现的更被认为是真实的,这表明了一种真理效应。在实验2中,我们重复了真理效应,并进一步发现接触刻板印象会减少对它们的道德谴责,这表明了一种道德重复效应。将真理效应和道德重复效应的研究扩展到积极刻板印象上,我们的研究结果强调了提高人们对接触在强化刻板印象信念的可信度和道德谴责方面所产生影响的认识的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b29/12372772/3693f3458485/irsp-37-933-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b29/12372772/3c25594e9747/irsp-37-933-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b29/12372772/3693f3458485/irsp-37-933-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b29/12372772/3c25594e9747/irsp-37-933-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b29/12372772/3693f3458485/irsp-37-933-g2.jpg

相似文献

1
True and Moral by Repetition: Unveiling the Impact of Exposure on Positive Stereotypes Perception.重复产生的真实与道德:揭示接触对积极刻板印象认知的影响
Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2024 Aug 7;37:14. doi: 10.5334/irsp.933. eCollection 2024.
2
The Effect of Labeling During Simulated Contact on Attitudes Toward Autistic Adults.模拟接触过程中的标签对对待成年自闭症患者态度的影响。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):93-99. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0081. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Comparing Self-Perceptions, Meta-Perceptions, and Peer Judgments of the Academic Experience of Autistic and Non-Autistic University Students.比较自闭症和非自闭症大学生学术经历的自我认知、元认知及同伴评价。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Aug 11;7(4):493-504. doi: 10.1089/aut.2024.0107. eCollection 2025 Aug.
6
Affective and cognitive underpinnings of moral condemnation when news of transgressions goes viral.违规行为的新闻疯传时道德谴责的情感和认知基础。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2025 Sep;154(9):2553-2568. doi: 10.1037/xge0001791. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
7
Overcoming Stigma and Bias in Obesity Management克服肥胖管理中的耻辱感和偏见
8
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间远程家庭监护模式的快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(13):1-151. doi: 10.3310/FVQW4410.
9
Autistic People's Experience of Empathy and the Autistic Empathy Deficit Narrative.自闭症患者的共情体验与自闭症共情缺陷叙事
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):321-330. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0001. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
"Questioning" the truth effect: Processing information in interrogative form reduces (but does not cancel) repetition-induced truth.对真理效应的“质疑”:以疑问形式处理信息会减少(但不会消除)重复引发的真理效应。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01742-9.
2
People underestimate the influence of repetition on truth judgments (and more so for themselves than for others).人们低估了重复对真相判断的影响(而且对自己的影响比对他人的影响更大)。
Cognition. 2024 Jan;242:105651. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105651. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
3
Repeatedly Encountered Descriptions of Wrongdoing Seem More True but Less Unethical: Evidence in a Naturalistic Setting.
反复出现的描述似乎更真实但不那么不道德:自然主义环境下的证据。
Psychol Sci. 2023 Aug;34(8):863-874. doi: 10.1177/09567976231180578. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
4
Repetition could increase the perceived truth of conspiracy theories.重复可能会增加阴谋论的可信度。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Dec;30(6):2397-2406. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02276-4. Epub 2023 May 23.
5
Truth by repetition … Without repetition: Testing the effect of instructed repetition on truth judgments.真理源于重复……没有重复:检验指令重复对真实判断的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Aug;49(8):1264-1279. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001170. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
6
The moral repetition effect: Bad deeds seem less unethical when repeatedly encountered.道德重复效应:当反复遇到坏事时,它们似乎不那么不道德了。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Oct;151(10):2562-2585. doi: 10.1037/xge0001214. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
7
Small Effects: The Indispensable Foundation for a Cumulative Psychological Science.微小效应:累积性心理科学不可或缺的基础
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):205-215. doi: 10.1177/1745691620984483. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
8
The effects of repetition frequency on the illusory truth effect.重复频率对虚假真实效应的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 May 13;6(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00301-5.
9
Misinformation and Morality: Encountering Fake-News Headlines Makes Them Seem Less Unethical to Publish and Share.虚假信息与道德:接触虚假新闻标题会让人们觉得发布和分享它们的行为没那么不道德。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jan;31(1):75-87. doi: 10.1177/0956797619887896. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
10
An initial accuracy focus prevents illusory truth.初始准确性关注可防止虚幻真实。
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104054. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104054. Epub 2019 Aug 29.