• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经性厌食症患者兄弟的认知与情绪加工:探索家族性认知易感性

Cognitive and emotional processing in brothers of individuals with anorexia nervosa: exploring familial cognitive vulnerability.

作者信息

Meneguzzo Paolo, Ceccato Enrico, Sala Alessandra, Santonastaso Paolo

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 29;16:1641020. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1641020. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1641020
PMID:40950755
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12426118/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is associated with altered cognitive and emotional traits, including deficits in empathy, theory of mind (ToM), and increased alexithymia. While these traits are well-documented in affected individuals, little is known about their presence in unaffected male siblings, who share genetic and environmental risk factors. This study investigates whether male siblings of women with AN (bAN) exhibit intermediate cognitive-emotional traits compared to both their affected sisters and general population (GP) controls.

METHODS

We assessed 31 bAN, 31 GP, and 31 affected sisters. Participants completed self-report questionnaires (Empathy Quotient, Toronto Alexithymia Scale, Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire) and two computerized tasks evaluating theory of mind (Story-based Empathy Task (SET), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task). Between-group differences were assessed using non-parametric tests due to the non-normality of the data. A binary logistic regression was then conducted to evaluate whether specific socio-cognitive variables predicted group membership.

RESULTS

bAN showed significantly lower scores than the GP on measures of cognitive empathy and theory of mind, particularly Causal Inference (SET-CI; r = 0.594, p < 0.001), Emotional Attribution (SET-EA; r = 0.520, p < 0.001), and Intention Attribution (SET-IA; r = 0.463, p = 0.001). Logistic regression identified SET-CI as the strongest predictor of bAN status. Other empathy and alexithymia measures showed no significant group differences.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that domain-general inferential difficulties-particularly in causal reasoning-may be associated with familial vulnerability to anorexia nervosa in male siblings. Further research is needed to clarify the role of such cognitive traits in the broader context of risk and to inform early identification and intervention strategies.

摘要

背景

神经性厌食症(AN)与认知和情绪特征改变有关,包括共情缺陷、心理理论(ToM)以及述情障碍增加。虽然这些特征在受影响个体中已有充分记录,但对于共享遗传和环境风险因素的未受影响的男性同胞中这些特征的存在情况知之甚少。本研究调查与患有AN的女性的男性同胞(bAN)相比,她们受影响的姐妹和一般人群(GP)对照组是否表现出中间认知-情绪特征。

方法

我们评估了31名bAN、31名GP和31名受影响的姐妹。参与者完成了自我报告问卷(共情商数、多伦多述情障碍量表、饮食失调检查问卷)以及两项评估心理理论的计算机任务(基于故事的共情任务(SET)、读心术任务)。由于数据不呈正态分布,使用非参数检验评估组间差异。然后进行二元逻辑回归以评估特定的社会认知变量是否能预测组成员身份。

结果

在认知共情和心理理论测量方面,bAN的得分显著低于GP,特别是因果推理(SET-CI;r = 0.594,p < 0.001)、情绪归因(SET-EA;r = 0.520,p < 0.001)和意图归因(SET-IA;r = 0.463,p = 0.001)。逻辑回归确定SET-CI是bAN状态的最强预测因子。其他共情和述情障碍测量未显示出显著的组间差异。

结论

这些发现表明,领域通用的推理困难——特别是因果推理方面——可能与男性同胞中神经性厌食症的家族易感性有关。需要进一步研究以阐明此类认知特征在更广泛的风险背景中的作用,并为早期识别和干预策略提供信息。

相似文献

1
Cognitive and emotional processing in brothers of individuals with anorexia nervosa: exploring familial cognitive vulnerability.神经性厌食症患者兄弟的认知与情绪加工:探索家族性认知易感性
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 29;16:1641020. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1641020. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Digital augmentation of aftercare for patients with anorexia nervosa: the TRIANGLE RCT and economic evaluation.神经性厌食症患者后期护理的数字化增强:TRIANGLE随机对照试验及经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(31):1-162. doi: 10.3310/ADLS3672.
4
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.
5
Losing weight, gaining confidence? actual weight does not predict body (dis)satisfaction and self-esteem in adolescents with anorexia nervosa.体重减轻,信心增加?实际体重并不能预测神经性厌食症青少年的身体(不)满意度和自尊。
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jul 16;13(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01338-3.
6
Individual psychological therapy in the outpatient treatment of adults with anorexia nervosa.成人神经性厌食症门诊治疗中的个体心理治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):CD003909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003909.pub2.
7
Social cognition in female adults with Anorexia Nervosa: A systematic review.神经性厌食症成年女性的社会认知:系统评价。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Jan;132:197-210. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.11.035. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
8
Interventions based on the Theory of Mind cognitive model for autism spectrum disorder (ASD).基于心理理论认知模型对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 21;2014(3):CD008785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008785.pub2.
9
Autistic People's Experience of Empathy and the Autistic Empathy Deficit Narrative.自闭症患者的共情体验与自闭症共情缺陷叙事
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):321-330. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0001. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Exploring neuropsychological underpinnings of poor communication after traumatic brain injury: The role of apathy, disinhibition and social cognition.探索创伤性脑损伤后沟通不良的神经心理学基础:冷漠、抑制和社会认知的作用。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Mar-Apr;59(2):433-448. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12836. Epub 2022 Dec 21.

本文引用的文献

1
On the Relationship Between Alexithymia and Social Cognition: A Systematic Review.述情障碍与社会认知的关系:一项系统综述
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2024 Aug;21(4):236-265. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20240402.
2
Cognitive and emotional empathy in acute and remitted anorexia nervosa: a systematic review.急性和缓解期神经性厌食症中的认知共情和情感共情:一项系统综述
Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 24;15:1385185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1385185. eCollection 2024.
3
Enhancing emotional abilities in anorexia nervosa treatment: A rolling-group cognitive remediation and emotional skills training protocol.增强神经性厌食症治疗中的情绪能力:滚动组认知矫正和情绪技能训练方案。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2024 Sep;32(5):1026-1037. doi: 10.1002/erv.3113. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
4
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on youth mental health: a cross-sectional study on eating disorder patients and their unaffected siblings.新冠疫情对青少年心理健康的影响:一项针对饮食失调患者及其未受影响的兄弟姐妹的横断面研究。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 Jan 6;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13034-023-00698-5.
5
A multidimensional examination of affective and cognitive empathy in anorexia nervosa.对神经性厌食症的情感和认知同理心进行多维评估。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2023 Jul;31(4):505-519. doi: 10.1002/erv.2980. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
6
A Multicenter Network Analysis Examining the Psychological Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients with Eating Disorders versus Their Healthy Siblings.一项多中心网络分析,考察新冠疫情对饮食失调患者及其健康兄弟姐妹的心理影响。
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 2;11(23):7187. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237187.
7
Anorexia Nervosa and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review.神经性厌食症与自闭症谱系障碍:系统综述。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Dec;306:114271. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114271. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
8
Alexithymia, dissociation and emotional regulation in eating disorders: Evidence of improvement through specialized inpatient treatment.进食障碍中的述情障碍、解离和情绪调节:专门住院治疗改善的证据。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022 Mar;29(2):718-724. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2665. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
9
Anorexia nervosa and comorbid autism spectrum disorders.神经性厌食症与共患自闭症谱系障碍。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 1;34(6):569-575. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000742.
10
Cognitive remediation therapy for anorexia nervosa as a rolling group intervention: Data from a longitudinal study in an eating disorders specialized inpatient unit.认知矫正疗法治疗神经性厌食症作为滚动组干预:来自饮食失调专科住院病房的纵向研究数据。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2021 Sep;29(5):770-782. doi: 10.1002/erv.2848. Epub 2021 Jun 12.