Suppr超能文献

丝线缝合结扎联合吻合器与单纯吻合器在单孔电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术中血管控制的疗效比较

Efficacy of combined silk suture ligation and stapler versus stapler alone for vascular control in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy.

作者信息

Cao Yonghao, Yuan Haoyang, Hu Wenxuan, Lv Xin, Lu Zihao, Zhu Yanchi, Zhao Jun, Li Yongsen, Xu Chun

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Institute of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2025 Aug 31;17(8):5972-5982. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-897. Epub 2025 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the widespread adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols and ongoing advancements in surgical techniques, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become a standard procedure in thoracic surgery due to its minimally invasive nature and accelerated postoperative recovery. The introduction of vascular staplers has revolutionized the intraoperative management of pulmonary vessels, offering surgeons a reliable and efficient method of vascular ligation. However, the optimal technique for pulmonary vessel handling during VATS remains a topic of debate. This retrospective study aims to compare the clinical safety and efficacy of using a vascular stapler alone versus a combination of silk suture ligation and vascular stapling, with a particular focus on postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 211 patients who underwent uniportal VATS lobectomy at The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January and December 2024 were included. One cohort received vessel management using staplers alone, while the other underwent combined silk suture ligation and stapler use for pulmonary artery and vein handling. Perioperative outcomes were evaluated, including chest tube duration, postoperative hospital stay, drainage volume and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time (P=0.70), intraoperative blood loss (P=0.73), postoperative drainage time (P=0.49), or postoperative hospitalization (P=0.08). However, the incidence of postoperative air leakage was significantly lower in the combined group (13%) compared to the stapler alone group (24%) (P=0.03). Additionally, the combined group exhibited reduced postoperative drainage volume (P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of silk suture ligation with vascular stapling enhances pulmonary vessel management by combining mechanical closure and physical ligation. This approach significantly reduces postoperative air leaks and drainage volume, potentially improving surgical stability and vascular stump integrity. These findings support the combined technique as a safer and more effective option for vascular control in VATS lobectomy.

摘要

背景

随着手术加速康复(ERAS)方案的广泛应用以及外科技术的不断进步,电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)因其微创特性和术后恢复加速,已成为胸外科的标准手术。血管吻合器的引入彻底改变了肺血管的术中管理,为外科医生提供了一种可靠且高效的血管结扎方法。然而,VATS期间肺血管处理的最佳技术仍是一个有争议的话题。本回顾性研究旨在比较单独使用血管吻合器与丝线结扎和血管吻合器联合使用的临床安全性和有效性,特别关注术后结果。

方法

纳入2024年1月至12月在苏州大学附属第一医院接受单孔VATS肺叶切除术的211例患者。一组仅使用吻合器进行血管管理,另一组则采用丝线结扎和吻合器联合使用来处理肺动脉和静脉。评估围手术期结果,包括胸管留置时间、术后住院时间、引流量和术后并发症。

结果

两组在手术时间(P = 0.70)、术中出血量(P = 0.73)、术后引流时间(P = 0.49)或术后住院时间(P = 0.08)方面无显著差异。然而,联合组术后漏气发生率(13%)显著低于单纯吻合器组(24%)(P = 0.03)。此外,联合组术后引流量减少(P = 0.01)。

结论

丝线结扎与血管吻合相结合,通过机械闭合和物理结扎增强了肺血管管理。这种方法显著减少了术后漏气和引流量,可能提高手术稳定性和血管残端完整性。这些发现支持联合技术作为VATS肺叶切除术中血管控制的一种更安全、更有效的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bf5/12433119/581ff6960c0d/jtd-17-08-5972-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验