• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体主导、系统正当化与敌对阶级主义:维系收入差距的感知社会经济人性差距的意识形态根源。

Group Dominance, System Justification, and Hostile Classism: The Ideological Roots of the Perceived Socioeconomic Humanity Gap That Upholds the Income Gap.

作者信息

Sainz Mario, Jiménez-Moya Gloria

机构信息

Departamento de Psicología Social y de las Organizaciones, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Spain.

Escuela de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2023 Jun 8;36:7. doi: 10.5334/irsp.753. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.5334/irsp.753
PMID:40951809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12372804/
Abstract

Perceiving low-socioeconomic status (low-SES) groups as less human than high-SES groups contributes to justifying socioeconomic inequality. Despite this issue's relevance, previous research has not acknowledged the possible causes of this perceived humanity gap (differences in humanity between SES groups). In this project, we focus on analysing the possible influence of hierarchy-enhancing ideological variables on this gap. To do so, in a first correlational study ( = 765), we analyse the extent to which certain ideological variables predict the perceived humanity gap between low- and high-SES groups. Our results indicate that group dominance, system justification, and hostile classism are highly predictive of the humanity gap. In a second correlational study ( = 521) we found that the perceived humanity gap, the tendency to blame low-SES groups and praise high-SES groups for their economic standings, sequentially mediated the relationship among social dominance, system justification, and hostile classism with the support of social change policies. Finally, we manipulated each ideological variable in three equivalent studies ( = 631) to test its influence on the previous pattern of mediational results. The results confirmed the ideological variables' antecedent roles in the mediation analysis. Finally, we discuss the role of the ideological hierarchy variables in the maintenance of socioeconomic differences through (de)humanisation.

摘要

将低社会经济地位(低SES)群体视为不如高SES群体有人性,这有助于为社会经济不平等提供正当理由。尽管这个问题很重要,但以往的研究尚未认识到这种感知到的人性差距(SES群体之间人性的差异)的可能原因。在这个项目中,我们专注于分析强化等级制度的意识形态变量对这种差距的可能影响。为此,在第一项相关性研究(N = 765)中,我们分析了某些意识形态变量在多大程度上预测了低SES群体和高SES群体之间感知到的人性差距。我们的结果表明,群体支配、制度正当化和敌对阶级主义对人性差距具有高度预测性。在第二项相关性研究(N = 521)中,我们发现,在社会变革政策的支持下,感知到的人性差距、因经济地位而责备低SES群体并赞扬高SES群体的倾向,依次介导了社会支配、制度正当化和敌对阶级主义之间的关系。最后,我们在三项等效研究(N = 631)中对每个意识形态变量进行了操纵,以测试其对先前中介结果模式的影响。结果证实了意识形态变量在中介分析中的先行作用。最后,我们讨论了意识形态等级制度变量在通过(去)人性化维持社会经济差异方面的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/582d/12372804/0d2dbe698b68/irsp-36-753-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/582d/12372804/51be36045708/irsp-36-753-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/582d/12372804/2ed23a01be08/irsp-36-753-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/582d/12372804/9983bdfb3f09/irsp-36-753-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/582d/12372804/ba2cba371dfa/irsp-36-753-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/582d/12372804/d9b7ceae3dd1/irsp-36-753-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/582d/12372804/0d2dbe698b68/irsp-36-753-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/582d/12372804/51be36045708/irsp-36-753-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/582d/12372804/2ed23a01be08/irsp-36-753-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/582d/12372804/9983bdfb3f09/irsp-36-753-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/582d/12372804/ba2cba371dfa/irsp-36-753-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/582d/12372804/d9b7ceae3dd1/irsp-36-753-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/582d/12372804/0d2dbe698b68/irsp-36-753-g6.jpg

相似文献

1
Group Dominance, System Justification, and Hostile Classism: The Ideological Roots of the Perceived Socioeconomic Humanity Gap That Upholds the Income Gap.群体主导、系统正当化与敌对阶级主义:维系收入差距的感知社会经济人性差距的意识形态根源。
Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2023 Jun 8;36:7. doi: 10.5334/irsp.753. eCollection 2023.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Aspects of Genetic Diversity, Host Specificity and Public Health Significance of Single-Celled Intestinal Parasites Commonly Observed in Humans and Mostly Referred to as 'Non-Pathogenic'.人类常见且大多被称为“非致病性”的单细胞肠道寄生虫的遗传多样性、宿主特异性及公共卫生意义
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70036. doi: 10.1111/apm.70036.
4
Socioeconomic Determinants of Sodium Intake in Adult Populations of High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高收入国家成年人群钠摄入的社会经济决定因素:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Public Health. 2017 Apr;107(4):e1-e12. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303629. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
5
Differences in the effectiveness of individual-level smoking cessation interventions by socioeconomic status.个体层面戒烟干预措施的有效性在社会经济地位方面的差异。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 27;1(1):CD015120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015120.pub2.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.用于改变食品、酒精饮料和烟草的选择及消费量的份量、包装或餐具尺寸。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 14;2015(9):CD011045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011045.pub2.
8
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
9
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
10
Investigation and analysis of mental health status of the older adult in western rural areas.西部农村地区老年人心理健康状况的调查与分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;13:1612600. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612600. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Dehumanization: trends, insights, and challenges.去人性化:趋势、洞察与挑战。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Mar;26(3):222-240. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
2
Lacking socio-economic status reduces subjective well-being through perceptions of meta-dehumanization.社会经济地位的缺失会通过元去人性化的认知降低主观幸福感。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Apr;60(2):470-489. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12412. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
3
Shifting attributions for poverty motivates opposition to inequality and enhances egalitarianism.贫困归因的转变激发了人们对不平等的反对,并增强了平等主义。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):496-505. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0835-8. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
4
Primes and Consequences: A Systematic Review of Meritocracy in Intergroup Relations.优势与后果:群体间关系中精英主义的系统综述
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 19;10:2007. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02007. eCollection 2019.
5
The surprising politics of anti-immigrant prejudice: How political conservatism moderates the effect of immigrant race and religion on infrahumanization judgements.反移民偏见的惊人政治:政治保守主义如何调节移民种族和宗教对非人化判断的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jan;59(1):157-170. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12337. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
6
The Support for Economic Inequality Scale: Development and adjudication.支持经济不平等量表:发展与裁定。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 21;14(6):e0218685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218685. eCollection 2019.
7
Where Does the Money Come From? Humanizing High Socioeconomic Status Groups Undermines Attitudes Toward Redistribution.钱从哪里来?将高社会经济地位群体人性化会削弱对再分配的态度。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 29;10:771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00771. eCollection 2019.
8
Political ideology shapes the amplification of the accomplishments of disadvantaged vs. advantaged group members.政治意识形态塑造了对弱势群体和优势群体成员成就的放大。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 29;116(5):1559-1568. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818545116. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
9
Animalizing the disadvantaged, mechanizing the wealthy: The convergence of socio-economic status and attribution of humanity.将弱势群体动物化,使富人机械化:社会经济地位和人性归因的趋同。
Int J Psychol. 2019 Aug;54(4):423-430. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12485. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
10
The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale.社会支配取向的本质:使用新的SDO₇量表对群体间不平等偏好进行理论化和测量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Dec;109(6):1003-28. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000033. Epub 2015 Oct 19.